Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Ames test (OECD 471): negative in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA with and without metabolic activation

Chromosome aberration test (OECD 473): negative in cultured peripheral human lymphocytes cells with and without metabolic activation

HPRT test (OECD 476): negative in Chinese Hamster V79 cells with and without metabolic activation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
28 Nov - 8 Dec 2008
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
adopted in Jul 1997
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 2008
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
His operon (S. typhimurium strains)
Trp operon (E. coli strains)
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Co-factor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and beta-naphtoflavone.
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Dose range finding test:
3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3330 and 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation for TA100 and WP2uvrA

Main study (experiment 1 and 2):
10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: test substance is soluble and stable in the vehicle throughout the test
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
9-aminoacridine
sodium azide
methylmethanesulfonate
other: 2-nitrofluorene (NF; 10 μg/plate in DMSO, -S9, TA98); 2-Amino-anthracene (2-AA; 1 to 10 μg/plate in DMSO, +S9, all strains)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 h

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates each in two independent experiments

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth
Evaluation criteria:
A test substance is considered positive if the total number of revertants is greater than 2 (TA 100) or three (TA 98, TA 1535, TA 1537, WP2uvrA) times the concurrent control. Positive responses should be reproducible in at least one additional independent experiment. All cultures must demonstrate the characteristic mean number of spontaneous revertants in the vehicle controls.
Statistics:
Mean values and standard deviation were calculated.
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: At a concentration of 1000 μg/plate and above, the test material precipitated in the medium.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In the range finding test, the test substance was tested up to 5000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9 mix in TA100 and WP2uvrA. No reduction of the bacterial lawn and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants were observed. Due to the precipitation of the test substance in medium at a concentration of 1000 µg/plate and above, this concentration was for the main experiment (TA1535, TA1537 and TA98 in experiment 1 and all strains for experiment 2).

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The negative and strain specific positive control values were within laboratory historical control data ranges (table 3, any other information on results)

Table 1. Test results of experiment 1 (plate incorporation) and range finding study (TA100 and WP2 uvrA)           

With or without S9-Mix (5%)

Test substance concentration

Mean number of revertant colonies per plate

 

 

(μg/plate)

(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation)

 

 

 

Base-pair substitution type

cross-linking type

Frameshift type

 

 

TA 100

TA1535

WP2 uvrA

TA98

TA1537

0

137 ± 1

12 ± 3

25 ± 6

29 ± 3

9 ± 3

3

139 ± 14

28 ± 6

 -

10

133 ± 16

10 ± 3

24 ± 4

31 ± 2

6 ± 2

33

137 ± 9

8 ± 2

23 ± 4

34 ± 5

4 ± 2

100

131 ± 9

11 ± 3

24 ± 5

26 ± 8

6 ± 2

333

132 ± 7

7 ± 4

26 ± 7

27 ± 10

5 ± 2

1000

137 ± 19P

7 ± 1P

21 ± 3P

28 ± 4P

6 ± 3P

3330

140 ± 9P

17 ± 1P

 -

5000

129 ± 13P

 -

23 ± 4P

 -

Positive controls,

-S9

Name

MMS

SA

4NQO

NF

9AA

 

Concentrations (μg/plate)

650

5

10

10

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD)

1132 ± 23

933 ± 31

1271 ± 22

1122 ± 62

357 ± 38

+

0

140 ± 11

9 ± 2

26 ± 9

35 ± 6

6 ± 3

+

3

127 ± 8

24 ± 3

 -

+

10

125 ± 10

9 ± 3

27 ± 5

37 ± 6

6 ± 2

+

33

130 ± 8

9 ± 2

25 ± 2

38 ± 7

4 ± 1

+

100

136 ± 6

9 ± 4

32 ± 7

34 ± 4

6 ± 1

+

333

117 ± 4

7 ± 2

26 ± 4

34 ± 5

6 ± 2

+

1000

125 ± 10P

5 ± 1P

26 ± 1P

34 ± 11P

6 ± 1P

+

3330

106 ± 7P

24 ± 6P

+

5000

102 ± 9P

 -

21 ± 2P

 -

Positive controls, +S9

Name

2AA

2AA

2AA

2AA

2AA

 

Concentrations (μg/plate)

1

2.5

10

1

2.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD)

1442 ± 40

406 ± 27

586 ± 62

1075 ± 21

539 ± 15

 

Table 2. Test results of experiment 2 (plate incorporation)

With or without S9-Mix (10%)

Test substance concentration

Mean number of revertant colonies per plate

 

 

(μg/plate)

(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation)

 

 

 

Base-pair substitution type

cross-linking type

Frameshift type

 

 

TA 100

TA1535

WP2 uvrA

TA98

TA1537

0

106 ± 11

12 ± 1

23 ± 5

29 ± 6

6 ± 1

10

123 ± 24

9 ± 2

23 ± 2

20 ± 5

6 ± 1

33

130 ± 20

8 ± 1

23 ± 2

21 ± 4

5 ± 2

100

103 ± 4

9 ± 1

26 ± 4

20 ± 5

3 ± 1

333

115 ± 6

10 ± 3

26 ± 4

18 ± 7

7 ± 4

1000

112 ± 9P

10 ± 4P

21 ± 5P

21 ± 5P

6 ± 2P

Positive controls, -S9

Name

MMS

SA

4NQO

NF

9AA

 

Concentrations (μg/plate)

650

5

10

10

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD)

921 ± 74

1022 ± 31

937 ± 20

1094 ± 8

322 ± 28

+

0

107 ± 4

8 ± 3

31 ± 5

36 ± 8

6 ± 2

+

10

94 ± 10

11 ± 1

29 ± 4

33 ± 9

4 ± 1

+

33

100 ± 5

10 ± 2

27 ± 4

27 ± 9

6 ± 1

+

100

105 ± 8

4 ± 1

34 ± 3

28 ± 2

7 ± 1

+

333

116 ± 9

8 ± 4

30 ± 4

23 ± 5

4 ± 1

+

1000

82 ± 5P

9 ± 1P

36 ± 3P

13 ± 6P

5 ± 2P

Positive controls, +S9

Name

2AA

2AA

2AA

2AA

2AA

 

Concentrations (μg/plate)

2.5

2.5

10

1

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD)

1261 ± 141

260 ± 43

317 ± 67

541 ± 123

526 ± 12

                                  

MMS = methylmethanesulfonate

4NQO = 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide

9AA = 9-aminoacridine

2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene

SA = sodium azide

NF = 7-nitrofluorene

P = Precipitate

Table 3. Laboratory historical control data

  TA1535 TA1537 TA98 TA100 WP2uvrA
Negative control - S9 + S9 - S9 + S9 - S9 + S9 - S9 + S9 - S9 + S9
Min 3 3 3 3 12 12 63 60 4 4
Max 28 29 19 21 45 51 194 195 44 44
Mean 12 11 7 6 21 26 119 99 19 20
3xSD 23 23 92 83 22 19 10 9 14 14
  TA1535 TA1537 TA98 TA100 WP2uvrA
Positive control - S9 + S9 - S9 + S9 - S9 + S9 - S9 + S9 - S9 + S9
Min 375 58 79 57 286 186 458 228 67 56
Max 1923 538 927 833 1790 1703 1593 2061 1403 1146
Mean 1061 202 352 370 1059 736 1057 1056 849 315
3xSD 596 229 389 383 545 935 530 991 892 377
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results: negative
Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
20 Oct - 21 Dec 2011
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
(200 metaphases scored)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted in Jul 2016
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
(200 metaphases scored)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 2008
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Target gene:
not applicable
Species / strain / cell type:
lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
CELLS USED
- Source of cells: Collected from healthy adult, non-smoking, male volunteers
- Sex, age and number of blood donors: Dose range stude (male, 34 years, average generation time = 14.6 h), first cytogenetic study (male, 27 years, average generation time = 14.4 h), second cytogenetic study (male, 25 years, AGT = 14.5 h)
- Whole blood was used

MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media including CO2 concentration:
RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with
- 20% (v/v) heat-inactivted foetal calf serum
- L-glutamine (2 mM)
- penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 µg/mL)
- 30 U/mL heparin
- Properly maintained: yes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of adult male wistar rats treated with phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone in corn oil
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment I
3 h treatment with and without metabolic activation: 10, 33 and 100 µg/mL
Experiment II
24 and 48 h treatment without metabolic activation: 10, 100 and 150 µg/mL
3 h treatment with metabolic activation: 10, 33 and 100 µg/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
mitomycin C
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3h, 24h and 48h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 3 h treatment: 48 h fixation time, 24 h treatment: 24 h fixation time, 48 h treatment: 48 h fixation time

SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colchicine 0.5 µg/mL culture medium
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa Solution 5% (v/v) in tap water

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200 (Parallel cultures were treated at each conenctration. 100 metaphases per culture were scored.)

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index of 1000 cells

OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: Yes
- Determination of endoreplication: Yes

Evaluation criteria:
A test substance was considered positive (clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) It induced a dose-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p< 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
b) A statistically significant and biologically relevant increase in the frequencies of the number of cells with chromosome aberrations was observed in the absence of a clear dose-response relationship.

A test substance was considered negative (not clastogenic) in in the chromosome aberration test if none of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p < 0,05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
Statistics:
Chi-square test, one sided, p < 0.05
Key result
Species / strain:
lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: Test substance precipitation was already seen at a concentration of 100 µg/mL at the 3-, 24- and 48-h exposure time without metabolic activation and at the 3-h exposure time with metabolic activation.
- Other confounding effects:
1) To make sure a positive response was observed the positive control cultures were exposed to 2 concentrations of MMC-C. The concentration stated and a double amount was used. Since the concentration stated in the protocol gave a positive response, the higher concentration was not used for scoring chromosomal aberrations.
2) In the first cytogenetic assay the spindle inhibitor colchicine was added 7 min late, 2 h and 23 min before end of experiment. However, the number of cells in metaphase was within the normal range and the deviation was considered to have no effect on the outcome of the study.
3) In the dose range finding study the lymphocytes were not cultured in duplicate and no positive control cultures were included. In the solubility test the test substance precipitated in the culture medium at the concentration of 333 µg/mL and therefore single lymphocytes cultures were cultured. This deviation in the study design has no influence on the results of the study.
4) In the first and second cytogenetic assay the culture temperature was below the range. However, these deviations occured at the beginning of the test only for a short time and the number of cells with aberrations found in the negative control were within the laboratory historical range.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The highest concentration analysed was selected based on the solubility of the test substance in culture medium or on toxicity, inhibition of the mitotic index of about 50% or greater.

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
Test results are in range with historical laboratory control data (for historical data see table 1 and 2 under any other informations on materials and methods incl. tables).

Table 1: Results of Range Finding Study

Without metabolic activation (-S9) Number of metaphases per 1000 cells
3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time (µg/mL) Absolute Percentage of control
DMSO 77 100
3 75 97
10 74 96
33 70 91
100 P 68 88
333 P 52 68
24 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time (µg/mL)    
DMSO 72 100
3 71 99
10 68 94
33 35 90
100 P 63 88
333 P 22 31
1000 P 18 25
2644 P 15 21
48 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time (µg/mL)    
DMSO 70 100
3 65 93
10 63 90
33 60 86
100 P 63 90
333 P 14 20
1000 P 9 13
2644 P 7 10
With metabolic activation (-S9)    
3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time (µg/mL)    
DMSO 71 100
3 68 96
10 67 94
33 66 93
100 P 57 80
333 P 53 75

P: Precipitation in the culture medium

Table 2: Results of experiment 1

Test item Concentration Mitotic Index Aberrant cells in %
  in µg/mL in % with gaps without gaps
Exposure period 3h, fixation time 24h, without S9 mix
DMSO 1.0% (v/v) 100 0 0
MMC-C 0.5 87 33*** 30***
Test substance 10 99 0 0
33 97 1 1
100 P 90 1 1
Exposure period 3h, fixation time 24h, with S9 mix
DMSO 1.0% (v/v) 100 0 0
CP 10 79 34*** 31***
Test substance 10 92 0 0
33 85 0 0
100 P 79 1 1

Significantly different from control group (Chi-square test), *** P < 0.001

P: Precipitation

Table 3: Results of experiment 2

Test item Concentration Mitotic Index Aberrant cells in %
  in µg/mL in % with gaps without gaps
Exposure period 24h, fixation time 24h, without S9 mix
DMSO 1.0% (v/v) 100 1 1
MMC-C 0.2 39 57 53
Test substance 10 96 1 0
100 P 66 1 1
150 P 48 0 0
Exposure period 48h, fixation time 48h, without S9 mix
DMSO 1.0% (v/v) 100 3 1
MMC-C 0.1 64 76*** 73***
Test substance 10 95 0 0
100 P 66 0 0
150 P 45 1 0
Exposure period 3h, fixation time 48h, with S9 mix
DMSO 1.0% (v/v) 100 1 1
CP 10 - a) 42*** 41***
Test substance 10 96 0 0
33 90 3 3
100 P 89 1 0

a) CP was fixed after 24 hours, MI not calculated compared to 48 h control.

Significantly different from control group (Chi-square test), *** P < 0.001

P: Precipitation

Table 4: Historical control data for lymphocyte chromosome aberration studies

aberrant cells per 100 metaphases
gaps included gaps excluded
with S9 without S9 with S9 without S9
Range 0 - 6 0 - 6 0 - 5 0 - 5
Mean 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.6
SD 1.0 1.0  0.9 0.9
n 404 599 405 601

n = number of observations

SD = Standard Deviation

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results: negative
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
02 Mar - 13 Jun 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted in Jul 2016
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Bayrisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt and xprt genes
Target gene:
HPRT locus
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
CELLS USED
- Source of cells: In the cell bank at Eurofins BioPharma, Planegg, Germany
- Suitability of cells: Yes
- Proliferation rate: 12 - 14 h
- Methods for maintenance in cell culture: Freshly thawed cells from stock cultures were maintained in plastic culture flasks in minimal essential medium (MEM) and cultured at a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and at 37 °C incubation temperature.

MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media: MEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/100 µg/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 25 mM HEPES and 2.5 µg/mL amphotericin B
- Properly maintained: Yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
co-factor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and β-naphthoflavone
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment I
Without S9 mix: 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400 and 500 µg/mL (4 h)
With S9 mix: 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400 and 500 µg/mL (4 h)
Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent: Based on the results of a solubility test DMSO was used as solvent.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
ethylmethanesulphonate
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
- Cell density at seeding: 3.0 x 10E6

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h
- Expression time: 7- 9 days
- Selection time: 7 - 12 days

SELECTION AGENT: 11 µg/mL thioguanine

STAIN: Giemsa

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicates in 1 independent experiment

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency and relative survival
Evaluation criteria:
A test chemical is considered to be clearly negative if, in all experimental conditions examined:
- none of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control,
- there is no concentration-related increase when evaluated with an appropriate trend-test
- all results are inside the distribution of the historical negative control data

A test chemical is considered to be clearly positive if, in any of the experimental conditions examined:
- at least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control, and
- the increase is concentration-related when evaluated with an appropriate trend test, and
- any of the results are outside the distribution of the historical negative control data.
- if there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate in the corresponding negative and solvent controls a concentration-related increase of the mutations within their range has to be discussed.

According to the OECD guideline, the biological relevance is considered first for the interpretation of results.
Statistics:
The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was applied to the mutation data to prove the dose groups for any significant difference in mutant frequency compared to the negative/solvent controls. Mutant frequencies of the negative/solvent controls were used as reference.
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Remarks:
Precipitation was observed at 500 µg/mL without metabolic activation and at 400 and 500 µg/mL with metabolic activation
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: The pH-value detected with the test item was within the physiological range (pH 7.0 ± 0.4)
- Effects of osmolality: Osmolality of the highest test item concentration was 445 mOsm/kg (solvent control: 425 mOsm/kg).
- Precipitation: Precipitation of the test item was noted at concentrations of 500 μg/mL (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 400 and 500 μg/mL (with metabolic activation).

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The selection of the concentrations used in the main experiments was based on data from the pre-experiments. No biologically relevant growth inhibition (reduction of relative survival below 70%) was observed after the treatment with the test item with and without metabolic activation (please refer to Table 1 under "any other information on results incl. tables").

HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (please refer to Table 4 under "any other information on results incl. tables")
- Positive historical control data: The positive control values were within the range of the historical control data.
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: The negative and solvent control values were within the range of the historical control data.

Table 1: Summary of results of the range-finding test

Dose Group Concentration [μg/mL] Number of cells at the Number of colonies per flask CE [%] Adjusted CE [%] Relative Survival (RS) [%]
beginning of treatment end of treatment I II mean
Without metabolic activation
NC1 0 4000000 3808000 165 150 158 79 75 113
NC2 4000000 3349000 169 147 158 79 66 100
S1 0 4000000 3383000 171 170 171 85 72 100
S2 4000000 3026000 178 143 161 80 61
1 25 4000000 3111000 137 191 164 82 64 96
2 50 4000000 3485000 168 163 166 83 72 109
3 100 4000000 2924000 180 172 176 88 64 97
4 250 4000000 2023000 173 173 173 87 44 66
5 P 500 4000000 2244000 164 147 156 78 44 66
6 P 1000 4000000 2380000 163 156 160 80 47 71
7 P 1500 4000000 2159000 188 160 174 87 47 71
8 P 2000 4000000 2278000 188 170 179 90 51 77
With metabolic activation
NC1 0 4000000 5287000 141 149 145 73 96 90
NC2 4000000 5695000 139 159 149 75 106 100
S1 0 4000000 5168000 154 164 159 80 103 100
S2 4000000 5542000 176 140 158 79 109
1 25 4000000 4658000 151 159 155 78 90 85
2 50 4000000 5066000 137 132 135 67 85 80
3 100 4000000 4437000 136 163 150 75 83 78
4 250 4000000 4029000 190 170 180 90 91 85
5 P 500 4000000 4437000 159 164 162 81 90 84
6 P 1000 4000000 3859000 171 163 167 84 81 76
7 P 1500 4000000 3655000 209 179 194 97 89 84
8 P 2000 4000000 3383000 170 165 168 84 71 67

NC: negative control

S: solvent control

P: precipitation at the end of treatment

CE: cloning efficiency

RS: relative survival

Table 2: Summary of results (experiment I)

    CE in non-selective medium CE in selective medium  
Dose Group Concentration [μg/mL] Number of colonies per flask CE [%] Number of colonies per flask Mutant Frequency per 106cells
I II mean   I II III IV V mean SD  
Without metabolic activation
NC1 0 143 175 159 80 7 8 8 3 10 7.2 2.3 22.6
NC2 160 153 157 78 3 11 8 5 5 6.4 2.8 20.4
S1 0 155 154 155 77 7 8 8 9 5 7.4 1.4 23.9
S2 148 147 148 74 2 7 10 8 5 6.4 2.7 21.7
1 25.00 166 152 159 80 14 6 16 12 10 11.6 3.4 36.5
2 50.00 144 154 149 75 19 14 9 10 11 12.6 3.6 42.3
3 100.00 174 157 166 83 10 7 7 3 8 7.0 2.3 21.1
4 150.00 169 160 165 82 7 9 4 3 9 6.4 2.5 19.5
5 200.00 144 157 151 75 8 11 7 12 11 9.8 1.9 32.6
6 250.00 161 144 153 76 3 6 3 9 3 4.8 2.4 15.7
7 300.00 187 176 182 91 1 2 3 4 6 3.2 1.7 8.8
8 400.00 183 170 177 88 10 11 11 15 6 10.6 2.9 30.0
9 P 500.00 163 156 160 80 2 3 1 7 5 3.6 2.2 11.3
EMS 300 μg/ml 177 134 156 78 62 83 75 70 82 74.4 7.8 239.2
With metabolic activation
NC1 0 179 141 160 80 2 6 11 4 12 7.0 3.9 21.9
NC2 175 177 176 88 7 5 11 8 4 7.0 2.4 19.9
S1 0 153 156 155 77 8 8 7 2 10 7.0 2.7 22.7
S2 152 158 155 78 6 11 10 7 11 9.0 2.1 29.0
1 25.00 162 169 166 83 2 6 5 6 7 5.2 1.7 15.7
2 50.00 159 179 169 85 4 15 8 6 8 8.2 3.7 24.3
3 100.00 164 158 161 81 13 13 6 7 9 9.6 2.9 29.8
4 150.00 171 157 164 82 3 10 6 4 7 6.0 2.4 18.3
5 200.00 172 162 167 84 10 2 9 2 9 6.4 3.6 19.2
6 250.00 158 133 146 73 10 8 8 9 7 8.4 1.0 28.9
7 300.00 147 169 158 79 4 1 2 9 4 4.0 2.8 12.7
8 400.00 177 154 166 83 4 4 9 7 4 5.6 2.1 16.9
9 P 500.00 154 171 163 81 12 13 6 7 6 8.8 3.1 27.1
DMBA 1 μg/ml 158 158 158 79 93 101 100 97 129 104.0 12.8 329.1

NC: negative control

S: solvent control (DMSO)

P: precipitation at the end of treatment

CE: cloning efficiency

EMS: Ethylmethanesulfonate [300 μg/mL]

DMBA: 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene [1 μg/mL]

Table 3: Results of the statistical analysis

Dose Group Concentration [μg/mL] Mutant Frequency p-value Statistical Significance
Without metabolic activation
NC1 0 22.6 / /
NC2 20.4 /  
S1 0 23.9 / /
S2 21.7 / /
1 25.00 36.5 0.0373 +
2 50.00 42.3 0.0023 +
3 100.00 21.1  0.6540 -
4 150.00 19.5 0.6563 -
5 200.00 32.6 0.0500 -
6 250.00 15.7 0.2414 -
7 300.00 8.8 0.0077 +*
8 400.00 30.0 0.0926 -
9 500.00 11.3 0.0120 +*
EMS 300 μg/ml 239.2 0.0007 +
With metabolic activation
NC1 0 21.9 / /
NC2 19.9 / /
S1 0 22.7 / /
S2 29.0 / /
1 25.00 15.7 0.0110 +*
2 50.00 24.3 0.5738 -
3 100.00 29.8 0.6590 -
4 150.00 18.3 0.0926 -
5 200.00 19.2 0.4169 -
6 250.00 28.9 0.5661 -
7 300.00 12.7 0.0356 +*
8 400.00 16.9 0.0899 -
9 500.00 27.1 0.9291 -
DMBA 1 μg/ml 329.1 0.0003 +

NC: Negative control

S: Solvent Control

DMBA: 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene [1.0 μg/mL]

EMS: Ethylmethanesulfonate [300 μg/mL]

+: significant

-: not significant

+*: significantly decreased compared with solvent control, therefore not relevant for interpretation of results

Table 4: Historical control data

  NC PC
  Experiment I Experiment I
  -S9 +S9 EMS DMBA
Mean 24 24 301 402
Min 9 8 193 132
Max 36 37 631 709
SD 7.98 7.40 79.86 172.21
RSD [%] 33.61 30.81 26.52 42.88
n = 40 46 44 44
LCL 7.8 9.2 141.1 57.2
UCL 39.7 38.8 460.9 746.1

NC: negative control

PC: positive controls (-S9 EMS; +S9 DMBA)

S9: metabolic activation

Mean: mean of mutants/106 cells

Min.: minimum of mutants/106 cells

Max.: maximum of mutants/106 cells

SD: standard deviation

RSD: relative standard deviation

n: number of control values

LCL: lower control limit

UCL: upper control limit

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results: negative
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Gene mutation in bacterial cells

The Mutagenicity of 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate was tested in a GLP-conform bacterial reverse mutation assay performed according to OECD guideline 471. The test was performed with a standard battery of Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100, and WP2uvrA bacterial cells (Notox, 2009). In the preliminary cytotoxicity test, concentrations of up to 5000 µg/plate were tested in TA 100 and WP2uvrA. 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate precipitated on the plates at dose levels of 1000 µg/plate and upwards. Cytotoxicity, based on a reduced background lawn and a decreased number of revertants, could not be observed at any of the concentrations. 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate did not have mutagenic properties in the absence or presence of metabolic activation. Positive control substances induced a distinct increase in the number of revertants in all strains with and without metabolic activation thereby proving validity of the assay. Based on the results of the conducted study, 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate was not considered to have mutagenic properties in bacterial cells.

 

In vitro cytogenicity in mammalian cells

An in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test was performed with the test substance in cultured peripheral human lymphocytes similar to OECD guideline 473 and under GLP conditions (Notox, 2012). Duplicate cultures were evaluated for chromosome aberrations in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (rat liver S9-mix). Based on the results of a range-finding study, concentrations of 10, 33 and 100 µg/mL were applied for 3 h in the first experiment with and without metabolic activation, respectively, with a 24-h fixation time. In the second experiment cells were exposed to 10, 100 and 150 μg/mL without S9 mix for 24 h with a 24-h fixation time and for 48 h with a 48-h fixation time, and to 10, 33 and 100 µg/mL with S9 mix for 3 h with a 48-h fixation time. Precipitation was observed at 100 µg/mL and above. Mitomycin C and Cyclophosphamide were used as positive control substances, which validated the test conditions and/or the activity of the metabolizing system. No cytotoxicity was observed at any concentrations tested. Precipitation was observed at concentrations of 100 µg/mL in the range-finding study. The evaluation of 100 well-spread metaphases per concentration revealed no biologically relevant increase in the frequency of chromosome aberrations at non-cytotoxic concentrations with and without metabolic activation in comparison to the negative controls. Thus, based on the results of this study, 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate is considered to be non-clastogenic to cultured peripheral human lymphocytes in vitro with and without metabolic activation.

 

In vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells

An in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay was performed according to OECD guideline 476 and under GLP conditions with the test substance, in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79) (Notox, 2017). The cells were treated for 4 h with and without metabolic activation (cofactor-supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of male rats, treated with phenobarbital and β-naphthoflavone). The test substance was tested at 25, 50,100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400 and 500 μg/mL with and without metabolic activation. Precipitation of the test substance was noted at concentrations of 500 μg/mL (with metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 400 and 500 μg/mL (without metabolic activation). 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene and ethylmethanesulfonate were used as positive controls with and without S9 mix, respectively, showed statistically significant increases in mutant frequency, thereby demonstrating both the sensitivity and validity of the test systems. A vehicle control (DMSO) and a negative control (treatment medium) were included, and the results fell within the historical control data range. No growth inhibition was observed in the experiments with and without metabolic activation. In the experiment without metabolic activation, statistical analysis showed that the mutant frequencies (25 and 50 μg/mL) were significantly increased over those of the negative controls (solvent and treatment medium), but there was no evidence for a dose-response relationship, since the mutant frequencies at higher concentrations (300 and 500 μg/mL) were significantly decreased when compared with the solvent control. Therefore, this effect was considered to be not biologically relevant. In the experiment with metabolic activation, the mutant frequencies at 25 and 300 μg/mL were significantly decreased compared with the solvent control. There was no dose-response relationship, and therefore this effect was also considered to be not biologically relevant. Therefore, it was concluded that the test substance was not mutagenic in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79) under the experimental conditions described.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data on genetic toxicity, there is no indication that 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate induces mutagenic properties in bacterial cells or mutagenic and clastogenic properties in mammalian cells, respectively. In conclusion, 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate does not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.