Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 607-240-0 | CAS number: 23511-73-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://www.echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames test (OECD 471): negative in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA with and without metabolic activation
Chromosome aberration test (OECD 473): negative in cultured peripheral human lymphocytes cells with and without metabolic activation
HPRT test (OECD 476): negative in Chinese Hamster V79 cells with and without metabolic activation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 28 Nov - 8 Dec 2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in Jul 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2008
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- His operon (S. typhimurium strains)
Trp operon (E. coli strains) - Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Co-factor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and beta-naphtoflavone.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Dose range finding test:
3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3330 and 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation for TA100 and WP2uvrA
Main study (experiment 1 and 2):
10, 33, 100, 333 and 1000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: test substance is soluble and stable in the vehicle throughout the test - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 2-nitrofluorene (NF; 10 μg/plate in DMSO, -S9, TA98); 2-Amino-anthracene (2-AA; 1 to 10 μg/plate in DMSO, +S9, all strains)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates each in two independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance is considered positive if the total number of revertants is greater than 2 (TA 100) or three (TA 98, TA 1535, TA 1537, WP2uvrA) times the concurrent control. Positive responses should be reproducible in at least one additional independent experiment. All cultures must demonstrate the characteristic mean number of spontaneous revertants in the vehicle controls.
- Statistics:
- Mean values and standard deviation were calculated.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: At a concentration of 1000 μg/plate and above, the test material precipitated in the medium.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In the range finding test, the test substance was tested up to 5000 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9 mix in TA100 and WP2uvrA. No reduction of the bacterial lawn and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants were observed. Due to the precipitation of the test substance in medium at a concentration of 1000 µg/plate and above, this concentration was for the main experiment (TA1535, TA1537 and TA98 in experiment 1 and all strains for experiment 2).
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The negative and strain specific positive control values were within laboratory historical control data ranges (table 3, any other information on results) - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 20 Oct - 21 Dec 2011
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- (200 metaphases scored)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in Jul 2016
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (200 metaphases scored)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2008
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: Collected from healthy adult, non-smoking, male volunteers
- Sex, age and number of blood donors: Dose range stude (male, 34 years, average generation time = 14.6 h), first cytogenetic study (male, 27 years, average generation time = 14.4 h), second cytogenetic study (male, 25 years, AGT = 14.5 h)
- Whole blood was used
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media including CO2 concentration:
RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with
- 20% (v/v) heat-inactivted foetal calf serum
- L-glutamine (2 mM)
- penicillin/streptomycin (50 U/mL and 50 µg/mL)
- 30 U/mL heparin
- Properly maintained: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of adult male wistar rats treated with phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone in corn oil
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I
3 h treatment with and without metabolic activation: 10, 33 and 100 µg/mL
Experiment II
24 and 48 h treatment without metabolic activation: 10, 100 and 150 µg/mL
3 h treatment with metabolic activation: 10, 33 and 100 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3h, 24h and 48h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 3 h treatment: 48 h fixation time, 24 h treatment: 24 h fixation time, 48 h treatment: 48 h fixation time
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colchicine 0.5 µg/mL culture medium
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa Solution 5% (v/v) in tap water
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200 (Parallel cultures were treated at each conenctration. 100 metaphases per culture were scored.)
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index of 1000 cells
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: Yes
- Determination of endoreplication: Yes - Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance was considered positive (clastogenic) in the chromosome aberration test if:
a) It induced a dose-related statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p< 0.05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations.
b) A statistically significant and biologically relevant increase in the frequencies of the number of cells with chromosome aberrations was observed in the absence of a clear dose-response relationship.
A test substance was considered negative (not clastogenic) in in the chromosome aberration test if none of the tested concentrations induced a statistically significant (Chi-square test, one-sided, p < 0,05) increase in the number of cells with chromosome aberrations. - Statistics:
- Chi-square test, one sided, p < 0.05
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: cultured peripheral human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: Test substance precipitation was already seen at a concentration of 100 µg/mL at the 3-, 24- and 48-h exposure time without metabolic activation and at the 3-h exposure time with metabolic activation.
- Other confounding effects:
1) To make sure a positive response was observed the positive control cultures were exposed to 2 concentrations of MMC-C. The concentration stated and a double amount was used. Since the concentration stated in the protocol gave a positive response, the higher concentration was not used for scoring chromosomal aberrations.
2) In the first cytogenetic assay the spindle inhibitor colchicine was added 7 min late, 2 h and 23 min before end of experiment. However, the number of cells in metaphase was within the normal range and the deviation was considered to have no effect on the outcome of the study.
3) In the dose range finding study the lymphocytes were not cultured in duplicate and no positive control cultures were included. In the solubility test the test substance precipitated in the culture medium at the concentration of 333 µg/mL and therefore single lymphocytes cultures were cultured. This deviation in the study design has no influence on the results of the study.
4) In the first and second cytogenetic assay the culture temperature was below the range. However, these deviations occured at the beginning of the test only for a short time and the number of cells with aberrations found in the negative control were within the laboratory historical range.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The highest concentration analysed was selected based on the solubility of the test substance in culture medium or on toxicity, inhibition of the mitotic index of about 50% or greater.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
Test results are in range with historical laboratory control data (for historical data see table 1 and 2 under any other informations on materials and methods incl. tables). - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 02 Mar - 13 Jun 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in Jul 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Bayrisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test using the Hprt and xprt genes
- Target gene:
- HPRT locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: In the cell bank at Eurofins BioPharma, Planegg, Germany
- Suitability of cells: Yes
- Proliferation rate: 12 - 14 h
- Methods for maintenance in cell culture: Freshly thawed cells from stock cultures were maintained in plastic culture flasks in minimal essential medium (MEM) and cultured at a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and at 37 °C incubation temperature.
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media: MEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/100 µg/mL penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 25 mM HEPES and 2.5 µg/mL amphotericin B
- Properly maintained: Yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- co-factor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and β-naphthoflavone
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I
Without S9 mix: 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400 and 500 µg/mL (4 h)
With S9 mix: 25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400 and 500 µg/mL (4 h) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Solvent used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent: Based on the results of a solubility test DMSO was used as solvent. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
- Cell density at seeding: 3.0 x 10E6
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h
- Expression time: 7- 9 days
- Selection time: 7 - 12 days
SELECTION AGENT: 11 µg/mL thioguanine
STAIN: Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicates in 1 independent experiment
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency and relative survival - Evaluation criteria:
- A test chemical is considered to be clearly negative if, in all experimental conditions examined:
- none of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control,
- there is no concentration-related increase when evaluated with an appropriate trend-test
- all results are inside the distribution of the historical negative control data
A test chemical is considered to be clearly positive if, in any of the experimental conditions examined:
- at least one of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent negative control, and
- the increase is concentration-related when evaluated with an appropriate trend test, and
- any of the results are outside the distribution of the historical negative control data.
- if there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate in the corresponding negative and solvent controls a concentration-related increase of the mutations within their range has to be discussed.
According to the OECD guideline, the biological relevance is considered first for the interpretation of results. - Statistics:
- The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was applied to the mutation data to prove the dose groups for any significant difference in mutant frequency compared to the negative/solvent controls. Mutant frequencies of the negative/solvent controls were used as reference.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Remarks:
- Precipitation was observed at 500 µg/mL without metabolic activation and at 400 and 500 µg/mL with metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: The pH-value detected with the test item was within the physiological range (pH 7.0 ± 0.4)
- Effects of osmolality: Osmolality of the highest test item concentration was 445 mOsm/kg (solvent control: 425 mOsm/kg).
- Precipitation: Precipitation of the test item was noted at concentrations of 500 μg/mL (without metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 400 and 500 μg/mL (with metabolic activation).
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The selection of the concentrations used in the main experiments was based on data from the pre-experiments. No biologically relevant growth inhibition (reduction of relative survival below 70%) was observed after the treatment with the test item with and without metabolic activation (please refer to Table 1 under "any other information on results incl. tables").
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (please refer to Table 4 under "any other information on results incl. tables")
- Positive historical control data: The positive control values were within the range of the historical control data.
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: The negative and solvent control values were within the range of the historical control data. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1. Test results of experiment 1 (plate incorporation) and range finding study (TA100 and WP2 uvrA)
With or without S9-Mix (5%) |
Test substance concentration |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate |
|
|||
|
(μg/plate) |
(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation) |
|
|||
|
|
Base-pair substitution type |
cross-linking type |
Frameshift type |
||
|
|
TA 100 |
TA1535 |
WP2 uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
– |
0 |
137 ± 1 |
12 ± 3 |
25 ± 6 |
29 ± 3 |
9 ± 3 |
– |
3 |
139 ± 14 |
- |
28 ± 6 |
- |
- |
– |
10 |
133 ± 16 |
10 ± 3 |
24 ± 4 |
31 ± 2 |
6 ± 2 |
– |
33 |
137 ± 9 |
8 ± 2 |
23 ± 4 |
34 ± 5 |
4 ± 2 |
– |
100 |
131 ± 9 |
11 ± 3 |
24 ± 5 |
26 ± 8 |
6 ± 2 |
– |
333 |
132 ± 7 |
7 ± 4 |
26 ± 7 |
27 ± 10 |
5 ± 2 |
– |
1000 |
137 ± 19P |
7 ± 1P |
21 ± 3P |
28 ± 4P |
6 ± 3P |
– |
3330 |
140 ± 9P |
- |
17 ± 1P |
- |
- |
– |
5000 |
129 ± 13P |
- |
23 ± 4P |
- |
- |
Positive controls, -S9 |
Name |
MMS |
SA |
4NQO |
NF |
9AA |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
650 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
1132 ± 23 |
933 ± 31 |
1271 ± 22 |
1122 ± 62 |
357 ± 38 |
+ |
0 |
140 ± 11 |
9 ± 2 |
26 ± 9 |
35 ± 6 |
6 ± 3 |
+ |
3 |
127 ± 8 |
- |
24 ± 3 |
- |
- |
+ |
10 |
125 ± 10 |
9 ± 3 |
27 ± 5 |
37 ± 6 |
6 ± 2 |
+ |
33 |
130 ± 8 |
9 ± 2 |
25 ± 2 |
38 ± 7 |
4 ± 1 |
+ |
100 |
136 ± 6 |
9 ± 4 |
32 ± 7 |
34 ± 4 |
6 ± 1 |
+ |
333 |
117 ± 4 |
7 ± 2 |
26 ± 4 |
34 ± 5 |
6 ± 2 |
+ |
1000 |
125 ± 10P |
5 ± 1P |
26 ± 1P |
34 ± 11P |
6 ± 1P |
+ |
3330 |
106 ± 7P |
- |
24 ± 6P |
- |
- |
+ |
5000 |
102 ± 9P |
- |
21 ± 2P |
- |
- |
Positive controls, +S9 |
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
1 |
2.5 |
10 |
1 |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
1442 ± 40 |
406 ± 27 |
586 ± 62 |
1075 ± 21 |
539 ± 15 |
Table 2. Test results of experiment 2 (plate incorporation)
With or without S9-Mix (10%) |
Test substance concentration |
Mean number of revertant colonies per plate |
|
|||
|
(μg/plate) |
(average of 3 plates ± Standard deviation) |
|
|||
|
|
Base-pair substitution type |
cross-linking type |
Frameshift type |
||
|
|
TA 100 |
TA1535 |
WP2 uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
– |
0 |
106 ± 11 |
12 ± 1 |
23 ± 5 |
29 ± 6 |
6 ± 1 |
– |
10 |
123 ± 24 |
9 ± 2 |
23 ± 2 |
20 ± 5 |
6 ± 1 |
– |
33 |
130 ± 20 |
8 ± 1 |
23 ± 2 |
21 ± 4 |
5 ± 2 |
– |
100 |
103 ± 4 |
9 ± 1 |
26 ± 4 |
20 ± 5 |
3 ± 1 |
– |
333 |
115 ± 6 |
10 ± 3 |
26 ± 4 |
18 ± 7 |
7 ± 4 |
– |
1000 |
112 ± 9P |
10 ± 4P |
21 ± 5P |
21 ± 5P |
6 ± 2P |
Positive controls, -S9 |
Name |
MMS |
SA |
4NQO |
NF |
9AA |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
650 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
921 ± 74 |
1022 ± 31 |
937 ± 20 |
1094 ± 8 |
322 ± 28 |
+ |
0 |
107 ± 4 |
8 ± 3 |
31 ± 5 |
36 ± 8 |
6 ± 2 |
+ |
10 |
94 ± 10 |
11 ± 1 |
29 ± 4 |
33 ± 9 |
4 ± 1 |
+ |
33 |
100 ± 5 |
10 ± 2 |
27 ± 4 |
27 ± 9 |
6 ± 1 |
+ |
100 |
105 ± 8 |
4 ± 1 |
34 ± 3 |
28 ± 2 |
7 ± 1 |
+ |
333 |
116 ± 9 |
8 ± 4 |
30 ± 4 |
23 ± 5 |
4 ± 1 |
+ |
1000 |
82 ± 5P |
9 ± 1P |
36 ± 3P |
13 ± 6P |
5 ± 2P |
Positive controls, +S9 |
Name |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
|
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
2.5 |
2.5 |
10 |
1 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 ± SD) |
1261 ± 141 |
260 ± 43 |
317 ± 67 |
541 ± 123 |
526 ± 12 |
MMS = methylmethanesulfonate
4NQO = 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
9AA = 9-aminoacridine
2AA = 2-Aminoanthracene
SA = sodium azide
NF = 7-nitrofluorene
P = Precipitate
Table 3. Laboratory historical control data
TA1535 | TA1537 | TA98 | TA100 | WP2uvrA | ||||||
Negative control | - S9 | + S9 | - S9 | + S9 | - S9 | + S9 | - S9 | + S9 | - S9 | + S9 |
Min | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 63 | 60 | 4 | 4 |
Max | 28 | 29 | 19 | 21 | 45 | 51 | 194 | 195 | 44 | 44 |
Mean | 12 | 11 | 7 | 6 | 21 | 26 | 119 | 99 | 19 | 20 |
3xSD | 23 | 23 | 92 | 83 | 22 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 14 | 14 |
TA1535 | TA1537 | TA98 | TA100 | WP2uvrA | ||||||
Positive control | - S9 | + S9 | - S9 | + S9 | - S9 | + S9 | - S9 | + S9 | - S9 | + S9 |
Min | 375 | 58 | 79 | 57 | 286 | 186 | 458 | 228 | 67 | 56 |
Max | 1923 | 538 | 927 | 833 | 1790 | 1703 | 1593 | 2061 | 1403 | 1146 |
Mean | 1061 | 202 | 352 | 370 | 1059 | 736 | 1057 | 1056 | 849 | 315 |
3xSD | 596 | 229 | 389 | 383 | 545 | 935 | 530 | 991 | 892 | 377 |
Table 1: Results of Range Finding Study
Without metabolic activation (-S9) | Number of metaphases per 1000 cells | |
3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time (µg/mL) | Absolute | Percentage of control |
DMSO | 77 | 100 |
3 | 75 | 97 |
10 | 74 | 96 |
33 | 70 | 91 |
100 P | 68 | 88 |
333 P | 52 | 68 |
24 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time (µg/mL) | ||
DMSO | 72 | 100 |
3 | 71 | 99 |
10 | 68 | 94 |
33 | 35 | 90 |
100 P | 63 | 88 |
333 P | 22 | 31 |
1000 P | 18 | 25 |
2644 P | 15 | 21 |
48 h exposure time, 48 h fixation time (µg/mL) | ||
DMSO | 70 | 100 |
3 | 65 | 93 |
10 | 63 | 90 |
33 | 60 | 86 |
100 P | 63 | 90 |
333 P | 14 | 20 |
1000 P | 9 | 13 |
2644 P | 7 | 10 |
With metabolic activation (-S9) | ||
3 h exposure time, 24 h fixation time (µg/mL) | ||
DMSO | 71 | 100 |
3 | 68 | 96 |
10 | 67 | 94 |
33 | 66 | 93 |
100 P | 57 | 80 |
333 P | 53 | 75 |
P: Precipitation in the culture medium
Table 2: Results of experiment 1
Test item | Concentration | Mitotic Index | Aberrant cells in % | |
in µg/mL | in % | with gaps | without gaps | |
Exposure period 3h, fixation time 24h, without S9 mix | ||||
DMSO | 1.0% (v/v) | 100 | 0 | 0 |
MMC-C | 0.5 | 87 | 33*** | 30*** |
Test substance | 10 | 99 | 0 | 0 |
33 | 97 | 1 | 1 | |
100 P | 90 | 1 | 1 | |
Exposure period 3h, fixation time 24h, with S9 mix | ||||
DMSO | 1.0% (v/v) | 100 | 0 | 0 |
CP | 10 | 79 | 34*** | 31*** |
Test substance | 10 | 92 | 0 | 0 |
33 | 85 | 0 | 0 | |
100 P | 79 | 1 | 1 |
Significantly different from control group (Chi-square test), *** P < 0.001
P: Precipitation
Table 3: Results of experiment 2
Test item | Concentration | Mitotic Index | Aberrant cells in % | |
in µg/mL | in % | with gaps | without gaps | |
Exposure period 24h, fixation time 24h, without S9 mix | ||||
DMSO | 1.0% (v/v) | 100 | 1 | 1 |
MMC-C | 0.2 | 39 | 57 | 53 |
Test substance | 10 | 96 | 1 | 0 |
100 P | 66 | 1 | 1 | |
150 P | 48 | 0 | 0 | |
Exposure period 48h, fixation time 48h, without S9 mix | ||||
DMSO | 1.0% (v/v) | 100 | 3 | 1 |
MMC-C | 0.1 | 64 | 76*** | 73*** |
Test substance | 10 | 95 | 0 | 0 |
100 P | 66 | 0 | 0 | |
150 P | 45 | 1 | 0 | |
Exposure period 3h, fixation time 48h, with S9 mix | ||||
DMSO | 1.0% (v/v) | 100 | 1 | 1 |
CP | 10 | - a) | 42*** | 41*** |
Test substance | 10 | 96 | 0 | 0 |
33 | 90 | 3 | 3 | |
100 P | 89 | 1 | 0 |
a) CP was fixed after 24 hours, MI not calculated compared to 48 h control.
Significantly different from control group (Chi-square test), *** P < 0.001
P: Precipitation
Table 4: Historical control data for lymphocyte chromosome aberration studies
aberrant cells per 100 metaphases | ||||
gaps included | gaps excluded | |||
with S9 | without S9 | with S9 | without S9 | |
Range | 0 - 6 | 0 - 6 | 0 - 5 | 0 - 5 |
Mean | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
SD | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
n | 404 | 599 | 405 | 601 |
n = number of observations
SD = Standard Deviation
Table 1: Summary of results of the range-finding test
Dose Group | Concentration [μg/mL] | Number of cells at the | Number of colonies per flask | CE [%] | Adjusted CE [%] | Relative Survival (RS) [%] | |||
beginning of treatment | end of treatment | I | II | mean | |||||
Without metabolic activation | |||||||||
NC1 | 0 | 4000000 | 3808000 | 165 | 150 | 158 | 79 | 75 | 113 |
NC2 | 4000000 | 3349000 | 169 | 147 | 158 | 79 | 66 | 100 | |
S1 | 0 | 4000000 | 3383000 | 171 | 170 | 171 | 85 | 72 | 100 |
S2 | 4000000 | 3026000 | 178 | 143 | 161 | 80 | 61 | ||
1 | 25 | 4000000 | 3111000 | 137 | 191 | 164 | 82 | 64 | 96 |
2 | 50 | 4000000 | 3485000 | 168 | 163 | 166 | 83 | 72 | 109 |
3 | 100 | 4000000 | 2924000 | 180 | 172 | 176 | 88 | 64 | 97 |
4 | 250 | 4000000 | 2023000 | 173 | 173 | 173 | 87 | 44 | 66 |
5 P | 500 | 4000000 | 2244000 | 164 | 147 | 156 | 78 | 44 | 66 |
6 P | 1000 | 4000000 | 2380000 | 163 | 156 | 160 | 80 | 47 | 71 |
7 P | 1500 | 4000000 | 2159000 | 188 | 160 | 174 | 87 | 47 | 71 |
8 P | 2000 | 4000000 | 2278000 | 188 | 170 | 179 | 90 | 51 | 77 |
With metabolic activation | |||||||||
NC1 | 0 | 4000000 | 5287000 | 141 | 149 | 145 | 73 | 96 | 90 |
NC2 | 4000000 | 5695000 | 139 | 159 | 149 | 75 | 106 | 100 | |
S1 | 0 | 4000000 | 5168000 | 154 | 164 | 159 | 80 | 103 | 100 |
S2 | 4000000 | 5542000 | 176 | 140 | 158 | 79 | 109 | ||
1 | 25 | 4000000 | 4658000 | 151 | 159 | 155 | 78 | 90 | 85 |
2 | 50 | 4000000 | 5066000 | 137 | 132 | 135 | 67 | 85 | 80 |
3 | 100 | 4000000 | 4437000 | 136 | 163 | 150 | 75 | 83 | 78 |
4 | 250 | 4000000 | 4029000 | 190 | 170 | 180 | 90 | 91 | 85 |
5 P | 500 | 4000000 | 4437000 | 159 | 164 | 162 | 81 | 90 | 84 |
6 P | 1000 | 4000000 | 3859000 | 171 | 163 | 167 | 84 | 81 | 76 |
7 P | 1500 | 4000000 | 3655000 | 209 | 179 | 194 | 97 | 89 | 84 |
8 P | 2000 | 4000000 | 3383000 | 170 | 165 | 168 | 84 | 71 | 67 |
NC: negative control
S: solvent control
P: precipitation at the end of treatment
CE: cloning efficiency
RS: relative survival
Table 2: Summary of results (experiment I)
CE in non-selective medium | CE in selective medium | ||||||||||||
Dose Group | Concentration [μg/mL] | Number of colonies per flask | CE [%] | Number of colonies per flask | Mutant Frequency per 106cells | ||||||||
I | II | mean | I | II | III | IV | V | mean | SD | ||||
Without metabolic activation | |||||||||||||
NC1 | 0 | 143 | 175 | 159 | 80 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 7.2 | 2.3 | 22.6 |
NC2 | 160 | 153 | 157 | 78 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6.4 | 2.8 | 20.4 | |
S1 | 0 | 155 | 154 | 155 | 77 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 7.4 | 1.4 | 23.9 |
S2 | 148 | 147 | 148 | 74 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 6.4 | 2.7 | 21.7 | |
1 | 25.00 | 166 | 152 | 159 | 80 | 14 | 6 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 11.6 | 3.4 | 36.5 |
2 | 50.00 | 144 | 154 | 149 | 75 | 19 | 14 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12.6 | 3.6 | 42.3 |
3 | 100.00 | 174 | 157 | 166 | 83 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 7.0 | 2.3 | 21.1 |
4 | 150.00 | 169 | 160 | 165 | 82 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 19.5 |
5 | 200.00 | 144 | 157 | 151 | 75 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 12 | 11 | 9.8 | 1.9 | 32.6 |
6 | 250.00 | 161 | 144 | 153 | 76 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 15.7 |
7 | 300.00 | 187 | 176 | 182 | 91 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 8.8 |
8 | 400.00 | 183 | 170 | 177 | 88 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 15 | 6 | 10.6 | 2.9 | 30.0 |
9 P | 500.00 | 163 | 156 | 160 | 80 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 11.3 |
EMS | 300 μg/ml | 177 | 134 | 156 | 78 | 62 | 83 | 75 | 70 | 82 | 74.4 | 7.8 | 239.2 |
With metabolic activation | |||||||||||||
NC1 | 0 | 179 | 141 | 160 | 80 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 4 | 12 | 7.0 | 3.9 | 21.9 |
NC2 | 175 | 177 | 176 | 88 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 8 | 4 | 7.0 | 2.4 | 19.9 | |
S1 | 0 | 153 | 156 | 155 | 77 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 10 | 7.0 | 2.7 | 22.7 |
S2 | 152 | 158 | 155 | 78 | 6 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 9.0 | 2.1 | 29.0 | |
1 | 25.00 | 162 | 169 | 166 | 83 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5.2 | 1.7 | 15.7 |
2 | 50.00 | 159 | 179 | 169 | 85 | 4 | 15 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8.2 | 3.7 | 24.3 |
3 | 100.00 | 164 | 158 | 161 | 81 | 13 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 9.6 | 2.9 | 29.8 |
4 | 150.00 | 171 | 157 | 164 | 82 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 6.0 | 2.4 | 18.3 |
5 | 200.00 | 172 | 162 | 167 | 84 | 10 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 9 | 6.4 | 3.6 | 19.2 |
6 | 250.00 | 158 | 133 | 146 | 73 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8.4 | 1.0 | 28.9 |
7 | 300.00 | 147 | 169 | 158 | 79 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 12.7 |
8 | 400.00 | 177 | 154 | 166 | 83 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 5.6 | 2.1 | 16.9 |
9 P | 500.00 | 154 | 171 | 163 | 81 | 12 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8.8 | 3.1 | 27.1 |
DMBA | 1 μg/ml | 158 | 158 | 158 | 79 | 93 | 101 | 100 | 97 | 129 | 104.0 | 12.8 | 329.1 |
NC: negative control
S: solvent control (DMSO)
P: precipitation at the end of treatment
CE: cloning efficiency
EMS: Ethylmethanesulfonate [300 μg/mL]
DMBA: 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene [1 μg/mL]
Table 3: Results of the statistical analysis
Dose Group | Concentration [μg/mL] | Mutant Frequency | p-value | Statistical Significance |
Without metabolic activation | ||||
NC1 | 0 | 22.6 | / | / |
NC2 | 20.4 | / | ||
S1 | 0 | 23.9 | / | / |
S2 | 21.7 | / | / | |
1 | 25.00 | 36.5 | 0.0373 | + |
2 | 50.00 | 42.3 | 0.0023 | + |
3 | 100.00 | 21.1 | 0.6540 | - |
4 | 150.00 | 19.5 | 0.6563 | - |
5 | 200.00 | 32.6 | 0.0500 | - |
6 | 250.00 | 15.7 | 0.2414 | - |
7 | 300.00 | 8.8 | 0.0077 | +* |
8 | 400.00 | 30.0 | 0.0926 | - |
9 | 500.00 | 11.3 | 0.0120 | +* |
EMS | 300 μg/ml | 239.2 | 0.0007 | + |
With metabolic activation | ||||
NC1 | 0 | 21.9 | / | / |
NC2 | 19.9 | / | / | |
S1 | 0 | 22.7 | / | / |
S2 | 29.0 | / | / | |
1 | 25.00 | 15.7 | 0.0110 | +* |
2 | 50.00 | 24.3 | 0.5738 | - |
3 | 100.00 | 29.8 | 0.6590 | - |
4 | 150.00 | 18.3 | 0.0926 | - |
5 | 200.00 | 19.2 | 0.4169 | - |
6 | 250.00 | 28.9 | 0.5661 | - |
7 | 300.00 | 12.7 | 0.0356 | +* |
8 | 400.00 | 16.9 | 0.0899 | - |
9 | 500.00 | 27.1 | 0.9291 | - |
DMBA | 1 μg/ml | 329.1 | 0.0003 | + |
NC: Negative control
S: Solvent Control
DMBA: 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene [1.0 μg/mL]
EMS: Ethylmethanesulfonate [300 μg/mL]
+: significant
-: not significant
+*: significantly decreased compared with solvent control, therefore not relevant for interpretation of results
Table 4: Historical control data
NC | PC | |||
Experiment I | Experiment I | |||
-S9 | +S9 | EMS | DMBA | |
Mean | 24 | 24 | 301 | 402 |
Min | 9 | 8 | 193 | 132 |
Max | 36 | 37 | 631 | 709 |
SD | 7.98 | 7.40 | 79.86 | 172.21 |
RSD [%] | 33.61 | 30.81 | 26.52 | 42.88 |
n = | 40 | 46 | 44 | 44 |
LCL | 7.8 | 9.2 | 141.1 | 57.2 |
UCL | 39.7 | 38.8 | 460.9 | 746.1 |
NC: negative control
PC: positive controls (-S9 EMS; +S9 DMBA)
S9: metabolic activation
Mean: mean of mutants/106 cells
Min.: minimum of mutants/106 cells
Max.: maximum of mutants/106 cells
SD: standard deviation
RSD: relative standard deviation
n: number of control values
LCL: lower control limit
UCL: upper control limit
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Gene mutation in bacterial cells
The Mutagenicity of 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate was tested in a GLP-conform bacterial reverse mutation assay performed according to OECD guideline 471. The test was performed with a standard battery of Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100, and WP2uvrA bacterial cells (Notox, 2009). In the preliminary cytotoxicity test, concentrations of up to 5000 µg/plate were tested in TA 100 and WP2uvrA. 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate precipitated on the plates at dose levels of 1000 µg/plate and upwards. Cytotoxicity, based on a reduced background lawn and a decreased number of revertants, could not be observed at any of the concentrations. 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate did not have mutagenic properties in the absence or presence of metabolic activation. Positive control substances induced a distinct increase in the number of revertants in all strains with and without metabolic activation thereby proving validity of the assay. Based on the results of the conducted study, 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate was not considered to have mutagenic properties in bacterial cells.
In vitro cytogenicity in mammalian cells
An in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test was performed with the test substance in cultured peripheral human lymphocytes similar to OECD guideline 473 and under GLP conditions (Notox, 2012). Duplicate cultures were evaluated for chromosome aberrations in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (rat liver S9-mix). Based on the results of a range-finding study, concentrations of 10, 33 and 100 µg/mL were applied for 3 h in the first experiment with and without metabolic activation, respectively, with a 24-h fixation time. In the second experiment cells were exposed to 10, 100 and 150 μg/mL without S9 mix for 24 h with a 24-h fixation time and for 48 h with a 48-h fixation time, and to 10, 33 and 100 µg/mL with S9 mix for 3 h with a 48-h fixation time. Precipitation was observed at 100 µg/mL and above. Mitomycin C and Cyclophosphamide were used as positive control substances, which validated the test conditions and/or the activity of the metabolizing system. No cytotoxicity was observed at any concentrations tested. Precipitation was observed at concentrations of 100 µg/mL in the range-finding study. The evaluation of 100 well-spread metaphases per concentration revealed no biologically relevant increase in the frequency of chromosome aberrations at non-cytotoxic concentrations with and without metabolic activation in comparison to the negative controls. Thus, based on the results of this study, 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate is considered to be non-clastogenic to cultured peripheral human lymphocytes in vitro with and without metabolic activation.
In vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells
An in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay was performed according to OECD guideline 476 and under GLP conditions with the test substance, in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79) (Notox, 2017). The cells were treated for 4 h with and without metabolic activation (cofactor-supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of male rats, treated with phenobarbital and β-naphthoflavone). The test substance was tested at 25, 50,100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 400 and 500 μg/mL with and without metabolic activation. Precipitation of the test substance was noted at concentrations of 500 μg/mL (with metabolic activation) and at concentrations of 400 and 500 μg/mL (without metabolic activation). 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene and ethylmethanesulfonate were used as positive controls with and without S9 mix, respectively, showed statistically significant increases in mutant frequency, thereby demonstrating both the sensitivity and validity of the test systems. A vehicle control (DMSO) and a negative control (treatment medium) were included, and the results fell within the historical control data range. No growth inhibition was observed in the experiments with and without metabolic activation. In the experiment without metabolic activation, statistical analysis showed that the mutant frequencies (25 and 50 μg/mL) were significantly increased over those of the negative controls (solvent and treatment medium), but there was no evidence for a dose-response relationship, since the mutant frequencies at higher concentrations (300 and 500 μg/mL) were significantly decreased when compared with the solvent control. Therefore, this effect was considered to be not biologically relevant. In the experiment with metabolic activation, the mutant frequencies at 25 and 300 μg/mL were significantly decreased compared with the solvent control. There was no dose-response relationship, and therefore this effect was also considered to be not biologically relevant. Therefore, it was concluded that the test substance was not mutagenic in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79) under the experimental conditions described.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data on genetic toxicity, there is no indication that 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate induces mutagenic properties in bacterial cells or mutagenic and clastogenic properties in mammalian cells, respectively. In conclusion, 2-phenoxyethyl octanoate does not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)