Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin: The substance did not induce any effects of skin sensitisation in an in vivo study with guinea pigs (OECD 406, maximisation test).

Respiratory: not available

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12 Sep - 13 Oct 1983
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
1981
EEC Directive 79/831
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The test was carried out according to the maximization test of Magnusson and Kligman (J. invst. Dermatol. 52, 268-276, 1969), recommended in the OECD guidelines 1981 and in the EEC directive 79/831.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Study predates availability of the LLNA method.
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Pirbright-Hartley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Ciba-Geigy, Basel, Switzerland
- Females nulliparous and non-pregnant: not specified
- Age at study initiation: ca. 10 wks
- Weight at study initiation: 309 - 459 g
- Housing: Macrolon Type III cage, individual housing
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): standard guinea pig pellets, NAFAG No. 84 6, Gossau SG, ad lib.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad lib.
- Acclimation period: n/a
- Indication of any skin lesions: healthy
- Sensitivity controlled every six months with p-phenylenediamine
- Acclimatisation: 11 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 23°C
- Humidity (%): 40 - 60 % rh
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 14 / 10
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Remarks:
and Freud adjuvant
Concentration / amount:
1% / 0.1 mL
Day(s)/duration:
7 days
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: vaseline
Concentration / amount:
30% / 0.4 g
Day(s)/duration:
48 h occlusive, then 12 days until challenge
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: vaseline
Concentration / amount:
30% / 0.2 g
Day(s)/duration:
48 h
Adequacy of challenge:
not specified
No. of animals per dose:
20
Details on study design:
The concentrations of the test compound for induction and challenge periods were determined on separate animals.

A control group was treated with adjuvant and the vehicle during the induction period. During the challenge period the group was treated with the vehicle as well as .with the test compound to control the maximal subirritant concentration of the test compound in adjuvant treated animals.
Challenge controls:
yes
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
p-phenylenediamine
Positive control results:
Not reported. Guinea pigs are tested every 6 months for sensitivity.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
30%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
30%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
30%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
30%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The substance did not induce any effects of skin sensitisation in an in vivo study with guinea pigs (OECD 406, maximisation test).
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Since the substance did not induce any effects of skin sensitisation in an in vivo study with guinea pigs, the classification criteria of Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 do not apply.