Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 925-698-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Not mutagenic or clastogenic in bacterial and/or mammalian cells in vitro.
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Adequate information exists to characterise the mutagenicity of Rosin adduct esters. These are formed after modification of rosin with either fumaric acid or maleic anhydride followed by esterification with glycerol and/or pentaerythritol, and hence the adduct ester products therefore exhibit close structural similarities. The available data includes results of tests conducted using Resin acids and rosin acids, fumarated, esters with pentaerythritol and Rosin, fumarated, reaction products with glycerol and pentaerythritol. This information is summarised below.
Bacterial cell mutation
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria, strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 of S. typhimurium and strain WP2 of E. coli were exposed to resin acids and rosin acids, fumarated, esters with pentaerythritol in water/ethanol (1:19) at concentrations of 62, 185, 556, 1667 and 5000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of a mammalian metabolic activation system using both the plate incorporation method and the pre-incubation method (Vivotecnia Research, 2010b). No cytotoxicity was observed at any dose level up to the limit concentration of 5000 µg/plate. No experiment with the test substance showed ratios above 2.5 as compared to the negative control, either with or without S9 metabolic activation. No dose response was observed for any of the tested bacterial strains. All vehicle and positive controls induced the appropriate responses in the corresponding strains. Based on the test conditions used in this study, resin acids and rosin acids, fumarated, esters with pentaerythritol was found to be neither mutagenic nor pro-mutagenic.
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria, strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 of S. typhimurium and strain WP2 of E. coli were exposed to rosin, fumarated, reaction products with glycerol and pentaerythritol in DMSO at concentrations of 60, 190, 560, 1670, 500 µg/plate in the presence and absence of a mammalian metabolic activation system using both the plate incorporation method and the pre-incubation method (Vivotecnia Research, 2010a). No cytotoxicity was observed at any dose level up to the limit concentration of 5000 µg/plate. No experiment with the test substance showed ratios above 2.5 as compared to the negative control, either with or without S9 metabolic activation. No dose response was observed for any of the tested bacterial strains. All vehicle and positive controls induced the appropriate responses in the corresponding strains. Based on the test conditions used in this study, rosin, fumarated, reaction products with glycerol and pentaerythritol was found to be neither mutagenic nor pro-mutagenic.
Mammalian chromosomal aberrations
Resin acids and rosin acids, fumarated, esters with pentaerythritol (CAS No. 94581-15-4), dissolved in ethanol, was assessed for its potential to induce structural chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes in vitro in three independent experiments. In each experimental group two parallel cultures were analysed (Harlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH, 2010). Per culture 100 metaphases were scored for structural chromosomal aberrations, except for the positive control in Experiment II, in the absence of S9 mix, where only 50 metaphases were scored. The highest applied concentration in the pre-test on toxicity (1950.0 µg/mL of the test item) was chosen with regard to the solubility properties of the test item and with respect to the current OECD Guideline 473. Dose selection of the cytogenetic experiment was performed considering the toxicity data and the occurrence of test item precipitation in accordance with OECD Guideline 473. In the absence and presence of S9 mix, concentrations showing clear cytotoxicity were not scorable for cytogenetic damage. In Experiment IB with narrow concentration spacing in the absence of S9 mix and in Experiment II in the absence of S9 mix, clear cytotoxicity was observed at the highest evaluated concentration. In Experiment II in the presence of S9 mix it was not possible to obtain evaluable concentrations in a cytotoxic range. In all independent experiments, neither a statistically significant nor a biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying structural chromosomal aberrations was observed after treatment with the test item. No evidence of an increase in polyploid metaphases was noticed after treatment with the test item as compared to the control cultures. Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls. They induced statistically significant increases (p < 0.05) in cells with structural chromosome aberrations.
Mammalian cell mutation
The study was conducted according to a
method that was designed to assess the potential mutagenicity of resin
acids and rosin acids, fumarated, esters with pentaerythritol (CAS No.
94581-15-4) on the thymidine kinase, TK +/-, locus of the L5178Y mouse
lymphoma cell line (Harlan Laboratories Ltd, 2010c). The method used
meets the requirements of the OECD (476) and Method B17 of Commission
Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008. Two independent experiments were
performed. In Experiment 1, L5178Y TK +/- 3.7.2c mouse lymphoma cells
(heterozygous at the thymidine kinase locus) were treated with the test
material at eight dose levels, in duplicate, together with vehicle
(DMSO) and positive controls using 4-hour exposure groups both in the
absence and presence of metabolic activation (2% S9). In Experiment 2,
the cells were treated with the test material at eight dose levels using
a 4-hour exposure group in the presence of metabolic activation (1% S9)
and a 24-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation. The
dose range of test material was selected following the results of a
preliminary toxicity test. The dose range for Experiment 1 was 10 to 80
µg/ml in the absence of metabolic activation, and 20 to 160 µg/ml in the
presence of metabolic activation. The dose range for Experiment 2 was 20
to 160 µg/ml in the absence of metabolic activation, and 40 to 180 µg/ml
in the presence of metabolic activation. The maximum dose level used was
limited by test material induced toxicity. Precipitate of test material
was not observed at any of the dose levels in the mutagenicity test. The
vehicle (solvent) controls had acceptable mutant frequency values that
were within the normal range for the L5178Y cell line at the TK +/-
locus. The positive control materials induced marked increases in the
mutant frequency indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and
of the activity of the metabolising system. The test material did not
induce any toxicologically significant dose-related increases in the
mutant frequency at any dose level, either with or without metabolic
activation, in either the first or the second experiment. The test
material was considered to be non-mutagenic to L5178Y cells under the
conditions of the test.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Not classified according to EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 orUN Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.