Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
13 April to 25 May 1983
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted in accordance with generally accepted scientific principles, possibly with incomplete reporting or methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1983
Report date:
1983

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
not applicable
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Hagnusson, B. & Kligman, A. M. (1969) The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea-pig maximization test. J. Invest. Dermat., 52 268-276.

(Scoring) OECD Guidelines for testing chemicals (1981) Published by OEDC, 2, rue Andre-Pascal, 75775 Paris, Cedex 16, France.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) method not introduced that the time of testing.
Information based on data from 2019 review of dossier

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Pentene
EC Number:
246-916-6
EC Name:
Pentene
Cas Number:
25377-72-4
Molecular formula:
C5H10
IUPAC Name:
pent-1-ene
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Pentene-1, N-amylene (as CAS No. 109-67-1)

- Physical state: Colourless liquid.

- Analytical purity: 94.4%

- Lot/batch No.: ST83/065

- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 1 October 1983.

- Stability under test conditions: Tested using infra-red spectra. The substance is judged to have been stable for the duration of the study. (Stabilities of formulations of the test substance) The stabilities of formulations of the test substance in corn oil or corn oil: Freund's Complete Adjuvant (1:1 v/v) were assessed by a panel of qualified chemists. These formulations were stable for at least one working day (7.5 h).

- Storage condition of test material: In the dark at ambient temperature.

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
male/female

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
corn oil
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal induction: 0.05% (m/v) in corn oil
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
corn oil
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal induction: 0.05% (m/v) in corn oil

Topical induction: 50% (m/v) in corn oil

Topical challenge: 25% (m/v) in corn oil


No. of animals per dose:
Range-finding (intradermal): 2 per sex per dose

Topical induction: 2 per sex per dose

Topical challenge:
(dose group) ten males and ten females
(control group) five males and five females

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25% (m/v) in vehicle
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
No positive reaction observed
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25% (m/v) in vehicle
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
No positive reaction observed
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
In the guinea-pig maximisation test of Magnusson and Kligman none of the 20 test animals showed positive responses at 24 or 48 hours after removal of the challenge patches. The test material therefore had no sensitising potential in guinea pigs.

Executive summary:

In the guinea-pig maximisation test of Magnusson and Kligman none of the 20 test animals showed positive responses at 24 or 48 hours after removal of the challenge patches. The test material therefore had no sensitising potential in guinea pigs.

The test material does not meet the criteria for classification according to EU classification system (Council Directive 67/548/EEC and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008).

The test was conducted following to the similar methodologies as OECD testguideline 406 (1981). There are no information available regarding the testing facility therefore a reliability of 2 is assigned.