Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-764-9 | CAS number: 541-02-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian cell study: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 004
- Report date:
- 2004
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 486 (Unscheduled DNA Synthesis (UDS) Test with Mammalian Liver Cells in vivo)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- unscheduled DNA synthesis
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane
- EC Number:
- 208-764-9
- EC Name:
- Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane
- Cas Number:
- 541-02-6
- Molecular formula:
- C10H30O5Si5
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,2,4,4,6,6,8,8,10,10-decamethyl-1,3,5,7,9,2,4,6,8,10-pentoxapentasilecane
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: Males 8 weeks / Females 9 - 12 weeks
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Chales River
- Age at study initiation: Males 8 weeks / Females 9 - 12 weeks
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: 2 same sex animals in stainless steel cages in sealed chambers
- Diet: ad libitum, except during exposure periods
- Water: ad libitum, except during exposure periods
- Acclimation period: 5days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: air
- Details on exposure:
- TYPE OF INHALATION EXPOSURE: whole body
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: 2200 L, stainless steel chambers equipped with glass doors
- Source and rate of air: Compressed air (40l/min)
- System of generating particulates/aerosols: Vapours generated by heating round-bottom flask containing test article
- Air flow rate: 380 l/min
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6 hours/day for 7 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily for 7 consecutive treatments
Doses / concentrations
- Dose / conc.:
- 160 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- highest that can be prepared consistently based on vapour pressure
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- 2-acetylaminofluorene
- Route of administration: Oral gavage
- Doses / concentrations: 100 mg/kg b.w.
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- hepatocytes
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): All animals were observed for mortality/moribundity twice daily during the 7 day exposure period, prior to and following exposure. Body weights were taken on the first day of the acclimatization period and on exposure days 1, 4 and 7.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Primary hepatocytes were obtained by liver perfusion and cultures were established and exposed for 4 hours to 3HTdR, which is incorporated if UDS occurs. Cells were fixed to coverslips, which were contained in the culture dishes, and prepared for silver grain counting (autoradiography)
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: At least two slides/animal and 50 cells/slide were evaluated. The nuclear and cytoplasmic grain counts, as well as, the net grain counts (nuclear minus cytoplasmic grains) were reported separately. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as positive if the mean number of net grains is higher than five per nucleus at one of the test points. A group average between 0 and 5 net grains is considered a marginal response.
- Statistics:
- Student's t-test for body weights; Mann-Whitney test for analysis of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) and normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE).
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The mean nominal concentration for the groups exposed to D5 (Groups 2, 5, 8 and 11) was 164.1 ± 3.2 ppm. The mean
analytical concentration for the same groups was 156.4 ± 3.1 ppm, thus, 4.7% lower than the mean nominal concentration.
There were no unscheduled deaths or clinical signs observed during the course of the study. There were no statistically
significant differences in body weight between the treatment and the control groups.
The viability of the hepatocytes was not substantially affected by the in vivo treatment with the test item at any
of the treatment periods. The interindividual variations obtained for the numbers and the viabilities of the isolated
hepatocytes were in the range of the laboratory's historical control.
The test item did not induce any UDS in the hepatocytes of the treated animals as compared to the current vehicle
controls. Neither the nuclear grains nor the resulting net grains were distinctly enhanced due to the in vivo treatment
of the animals with the test item. Therefore, the net grain values obtained after treatment with the test item were
consistently negative. In addition, no substantial shift to higher values was obtained in the percentage distributions
of the nuclear grain counts.
In vivo treatment with 2-AAF revealed distinct increases in the number of nuclear and net grain counts.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 Mean net grains per nucleus
Treatment |
Net grains per nucleus (males) |
Net grains per nucleus (females) |
||
Period |
5/6 hours |
16 hours |
5/6 hours |
16 hours |
Air control |
-9.57 |
-14.80 |
-6.51 |
-12.85 |
160 ppm D5 |
-9.72 |
-13.16 |
-7.26 |
-11.83 |
Positive control |
45.65 |
17.99 |
34.27 |
13.41 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane has been tested according to OECD 486 and in compliance with GLP in an inhalation study in rat. No test substance related induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis in the hepatocytes of treated rats relative to the vehicle was observed. Appropriate positive control substance was used and gave expected results. it is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis in rat hepatocytes under the conditions of the test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.