Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 235-185-9 | CAS number: 12125-01-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://www.echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Meets generally accepted scientific standards and accepatble for assessment - restrictions: incomprehensive reporting
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Primary mutagenicity screening of food additives currently used in Japan
- Author:
- Ishidate M. Jr., Sofuni T., Yoshikawa M., Nohmi T., Sawada M., Matsuoka A.
- Year:
- 1 984
- Bibliographic source:
- Fd. Chem. Toxic., 22: 623-636
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- A comparative analysis of data on the clastogenicity of 951 chemical substances tested in mammalian cell cultures
- Author:
- Ishidate M. Jr., Harnois MC., and Sofuni T.
- Year:
- 1 988
- Bibliographic source:
- Mutat. Res., 195: 151-213
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Micronucleus tests in mice on 39 food additives and eight miscellaneous chemicals
- Author:
- Hayashi, M., Kishi, M., Sofuni, T. and Ishidate, M.
- Year:
- 1 988
- Bibliographic source:
- Food and Chemical Toxicology 26(6): 487-500
- Reference Type:
- review article or handbook
- Title:
- SIDS Initial Assessment Report For SIAM 17 - Ammonium Chloride (12125-02-9)
- Author:
- OECD SIDS
- Year:
- 2 004
- Bibliographic source:
- UNEP Publications
- Report date:
- 2004
- Reference Type:
- review article or handbook
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- According to the method Ishidate, M.,Jr. und Odashima, S.: Mutation Research 48, 337
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Ammonium chloride
- EC Number:
- 235-186-4
- EC Name:
- Ammonium chloride
- Cas Number:
- 12125-02-9
- IUPAC Name:
- ammonium chloride
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Ammonium chloride
- Source: Japan Food Additives Association, Tokyo
- Analytical purity: 99.7%
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- not applicable
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (CHL)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Origins: The cell line was originally established from the lung of a newborn female at the Cancer Research Institute, Tokyo
- Modal number: 25
- Doubling time 15 hours
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The authors reported that three doses were tested. However, results for only two doses were reported
- 0.3 and 0.4 mg/ml. The third dose tested could not be identified - Vehicle / solvent:
- physiol. saline
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (untreated cells)
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- In the study a total of 242 substances were tested. Of these substances, 54 were positive for causing chromosomal aberration, of which some have been shown to be also positive for carcinogenicity in rodents.
- Positive control substance:
- other: example of positively tested substance (chromosomal aberration + carcinogenicity): potassium bromate
- Remarks:
- Based on arguments cited above, the test system is considered to be adequatedly sensitive in distinguishing between substance capable of causing chromosomal aberration and substances not causing chromosomal aberration.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- DURATION
- Exposure duration: 24 and 48 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays):
- Name: Colcemid
- Concentration: 0.2 µg/ml
- Time schedule for addition: 2 hours before harvesting
STAIN: Giemsa solution (1.5%, at pH 6.8; E. Merck) for 12-15 mins
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: In case no dose dependency was found in the first experiment, a repeat experiment was performed at similar dose levels
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 well spread metaphases
The incidence of polyploid cells as well as cells with structural chromosomal aberrations such as chromatid or chromosomal gaps, breaks, exchanges, ring formations, fragmentations, and others, was recorded for each culture plate. - Evaluation criteria:
- The result was considered to be
- negative if the incidence of aberration is less than 4.9%.
- ambiguous if the incidence of aberration is between 5.0-9.9%.
- positive if the incidence of aberration is above 10%.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- other: Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (CHL) cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
- The maximum dose chosen was based on the cytotoxicity and osmolarity. The maximum dose chosen for the main study was the concentration needed for 50% cell growth inhibition, estimated using a cell dosimeter (Monocellater, Olympus Co. Ltd.). - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
The incidence of aberration in the untreated and solvent control was about 3.0%. The incidence of cells with structural chromosomal aberrations at 0.4 mg/ml after 48hr treatment was 47.0%. The incidences of structural aberrations at 0.3 mg/ml after 24 hours and 48 hours of exposure were 11.0% and 30%, respectively.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
positive without metabolic activation
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)