Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

In vitro gene mutation in bacteria (OECD 471, Ames): negative with and without metabolic activation

Conclusion based on data obtained with octan-1-ol, ethoxylated (CAS No. 27252-75-1, EC No. 500-058-1) and considering all available data on gene mutation in bacteria in the Alcohol Ethoxylates (AE) category in a Weigh-of-Evidence approach.

 

No additional genetic toxicity information is required according to the respective tonnage band of octan-1-ol, ethoxylated (CAS No. 27252-75-1, EC No. 500-058-1; 1 - 10 tpa, Annex VII information requirements). The following key information on genetic toxicity is available in the database of the AE category:

 

In vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration in mammalian cells: negative with and without metabolic activation

Conclusion based on all available data on cytogenicity / chromosome aberration in mammalian cells in the AE category considered in a Weigh-of-Evidence approach.

 

In vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells: negative with and without metabolic activation

Conclusion based on all available data on gene mutation in mammalian cells in the AE category considered in a Weigh-of-Evidence approach.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
06 - 21 Dec 2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
adopted 21 Jul 1997
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Version / remarks:
adopted 30 May 2008
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
Version / remarks:
adopted Aug 1998
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japan MAFF
Version / remarks:
adopted 24 Nov 2000
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ICH S2(R1)
Version / remarks:
adopted Jun 2012
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, Department of Health, London, United Kingdom
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Specific details on test material used for the study:
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature, in the dark
Target gene:
his operon
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
cofactor-supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of male rats treated with phenobarbital and beta-naphthoflavone
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation.
The maximum dose level of the test item was selected as the OECD 471 recommended dose level of 5000 µg/plate.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle/solvent used: DMSO
- Lot No. 184106
- Justification for choice of vehicle: The test item was immiscible in sterile distilled water at 50 mg/mL but was fully miscible in DMSO at the same concentration
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
9-aminoacridine
N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
benzo(a)pyrene
other: 2-aminoanthracene (2AA)
Remarks:
-S9: ENNG (2 µg/plate) f. WP2uvrA, (3 µg/plate) for TA100 + (5 µg/plate) f. TA1535; 9AA (80 µg/plate) f. TA1537; 4NQO (0.2 µg/plate) f. TA98 / +S9: 2AA (1 µg/plate) f. TA100, (2µg/plate) f. TA1535 + TA1537, (10µg/plate) f. WP2uvrA; BP (5 µg/plate) f. TA98
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION:
Initial mutation test: Plate incorporation
Confirmatory mutation test: Pre-incubation

DURATION
- Pre-incubation period: 20 min at 37 ± 3 °C
- Exposure duration: 48 to 72 h

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicates each in two independent experiments

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: observation of bacterial growth inhibition
Evaluation criteria:
A test item was considered mutagenic (positive) if the following criteria were met:
- a dose-related increase in mutant frequencies over the dose range tested
- a reproducible increase at one or more concentrations
- biological relevance against historical control ranges
- a fold increase greater than two times the concurrent vehicle control for TA100, TA98 and WP2uvrA or a three-fold increase for TA1535 and TA1537

A test item was considered non-mutagenic (negative) if the above mentioned criteria were not met.
Statistics:
Statistical significance was confirmed by using Dunnetts Regression Analysis (p < 0.05) for those values that indicate statistically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies compared to the concurrent solvent control.
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: No precipitation was observed in any experiment at any concentration
 
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Results of positive and negative controls fell within historical control data range. Data are summarised in "Any other information on results incl. tables" Table 5.

Table 1: Test results - first experiment (plate incorporation test) without metabolic activation

Test Period

From: 07 December 2018

To: 10 December 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S9-Mix (-)

Dose Level Per Plate

Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD

Base-pair substitution strains

Frameshift strains

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA

TA98

TA1537

Solvent Control (DMSO)

81

94

97

(91)

8.5#

13

12

18

(14)

3.2

28

28

38

(31)

5.8

30

24

27

(27)

3.0

18

23

9

(17)

7.1

 

1.5 µg

98

90

105

(98)

7.5

21

17

18

(19)

2.1

41

21

26

(29)

10.4

17

24

15

(19)

4.7

11

27

12

(17)

9.0

 

5 µg

98

98

107

(101)

5.2

12

9

28

(16)

10.2

34

26

33

(31)

4.4

17

34

25

(25)

8.5

12

14

17

(14)

2.5

 

15 µg

86

109

99

(98)

11.5

16

9

14

(13)

3.6

48

25

21

(31)

14.6

25

32

28

(28)

3.5

28

26

6

(20)

12.2

 

50 µg

91

115

112

(106)

13.1

9

8

14

(10)

3.2

30

32

40

(34)

5.3

28

19

31

(26)

6.2

11

14

9

(11)

2.5

 

150 µg

64

92

95

(84)

17.1

15

14

15

(15)

0.6

26

21

32

(26)

5.5

24

16

18

(19)

4.2

13

18

24

(18)

5.5

 

500 µg

90

106

86

(94)

10.6

16

18

13

(16)

2.5

27

30

29

(29)

1.5

11

19

17

(16)

4.2

12

21

22

(18)

5.5

 

1500 µg

97

88

93

(93)

4.5

12

15

14

(14)

1.5

46

23

37

(35)

11.6

21

24

31

(25)

5.1

14

12

7

(11)

3.6

 

5000 µg

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

0 V

0 V

0 V

(0)

0.0

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

Positive controls S9-Mix (-)

 

Name DoseLevel

No. of Revertants

ENNG

ENNG

ENNG

4NQO

9AA

3 µg

5 µg

2 µg

0.2 µg

80 µg

653

559

690

(634)

67.5

113

140

118

(124)

14.4

837

807

777

(807)

30.0

175

187

167

(176)

10.1

129

123

114

(122)

7.5

ENNG: N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

4NQO: 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide

9AA: 9-Aminoacridine

T: Toxic, no bacterial background lawn

V: Very weak bacterial backgroundlawn

#: Standard deviation

Table 2: Test results - first experiment (plate incorporation test) with metabolic activation

Test Period

From: 07 December 2018

To: 10 December 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S9-Mix (+)

Dose Level Per Plate

Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD

Base-pair substitution strains

Frameshift strains

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA

TA98

TA1537

Solvent Control (DMSO)

108

101

115

(108)

7.0#

16

12

21

(16)

4.5

42

52

41

(45)

6.1

40

31

31

(34)

5.2

14

10

6

(10)

4.0

 

1.5 µg

105

93

89

(96)

8.3

24

18

15

(19)

4.6

48

26

38

(37)

11.0

35

33

44

(37)

5.9

14

10

11

(12)

2.1

 

5 µg

90

105

117

(104)

13.5

18

15

32

(22)

9.1

42

37

41

(40)

2.6

26

23

27

(25)

2.1

13

13

11

(12)

1.2

 

15 µg

83

91

95

(90)

6.1

19

10

13

(14)

4.6

32

33

40

(35)

4.4

19

35

32

(29)

8.5

16

8

8

(11)

4.6

 

50 µg

89

113

115

(106)

14.5

11

10

12

(11)

1.0

34

34

34

(34)

0.0

30

35

30

(32)

2.9

10

10

18

(13)

4.6

 

150 µg

94

94

100

(96)

3.5

17

15

12

(15)

2.5

45

50

48

(48)

2.5

43

22

27

(31)

11.0

21

14

14

(16)

4.0

 

500 µg

89

97

93

(93)

4.0

13

10

7

(10)

3.0

36

43

48

(42)

6.0

29

17

32

(26)

7.9

9

9

9

(9)

0.0

 

1500 µg

97

102

98

(99)

2.6

12

15

14

(14)

1.5

44

49

34

(42)

7.6

36

24

41

(34)

8.7

11

12

12

(12)

0.6

 

5000 µg

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

0 V

0 V

0 V

(0)

0.0

0 V

0 V

0 V

(0)

0.0

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

Positive controls S9-Mix (+)

 

Name DoseLevel

No. of Revertants

2AA

2AA

2AA

BP

2AA

1 µg

2 µg

10 µg

5 µg

2 µg

1568

1502

1377

(1482)

97.0

261

244

247

(251)

9.1

202

217

270

(230)

35.7

192

197

199

(196)

3.6

270

286

308

(288)

19.1

BP: Benzo(a)pyrene

2AA: 2 -Aminoanthracene

T:Toxic, no bacterial background lawn

V:Very weak bacterial backgroundlawn

#: Standard deviation

Table 3: Test results - second experiment (pre-incubation test) without metabolic activation

Test Period

From: 18 December 2018

To: 21 December 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S9-Mix (-)

Dose Level Per Plate

Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD

Base-pair substitution strains

Frameshift strains

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA

TA98

TA1537

Solvent Control (DMSO)

113

88

87

(96)

14.7#

18

14

17

(16)

2.1

32

16

26

(25)

8.1

26

34

23

(28)

5.7

14

8

16

(13)

4.2

 

1.5 µg

111

92

124

(109)

16.1

25

14

28

(22)

7.4

22

24

28

(25)

3.1

28

15

18

(20)

6.8

8

8

6

(7)

1.2

 

5 µg

76

124

116

(105)

25.7

16

17

17

(17)

0.6

31

21

18

(23)

6.8

23

25

27

(25)

2.0

3

8

13

(8)

5.0

 

15 µg

114

143

121

(126)

15.1

16

16

17

(16)

0.6

19

23

20

(21)

2.1

23

34

28

(28)

5.5

12

10

13

(12)

1.5

 

50 µg

104

147

119

(123)

21.8

16

16

22

(18)

3.5

17

16

31

(21)

8.4

23

30

34

(29)

5.6

8

13

13

(11)

2.9

 

150 µg

101

100

112

(104)

6.7

18

13

16

(16)

2.5

21

23

19

(21)

2.0

33

21

23

(26)

6.4

11

5

11

(9)

3.5

 

500 µg

98 S

100 S

102 S

(100)

2.0

20

28

13

(20)

7.5

23

26

26

(25)

1.7

24

17

27

(23)

5.1

7

10

2

(6)

4.0

 

1500 µg

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

8 S

12 S

7 S

(9)

2.6

14 S

20 S

14 S

(16)

3.5

17 S

22 S

21 S

(20)

2.6

6 S

2 S

1 S

(3)

2.6

 

5000 µg

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

0 V

0 V

0 V

(0)

0.0

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

Positive controls S9-Mix (-)

 

Name DoseLevel

No. of Revertants

ENNG

ENNG

ENNG

4NQO

9AA

3 µg

5 µg

2 µg

0.2 µg

80 µg

962

1054

1057

(1024)

54.0

1819

2356

1807

(1994)

313.6

901

911

989

(934)

48.2

286

251

236

(258)

25.7

260

246

418

(308)

95.5

ENNG:N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

4NQO: 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide

9AA: 9-Aminoacridine

S: Sparse bacterial background lawn

T:Toxic, no bacterial background lawn

V:Very weak bacterial backgroundlawn

#: Standard deviation

Table 4: Test results - second experiment (pre-incubation test) with metabolic activation

Test Period

From: 18 December 2018

To: 21 December 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

S9-Mix (+)

Dose Level Per Plate

Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD

Base-pair substitution strains

Frameshift strains

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA

TA98

TA1537

Solvent Control (DMSO)

90

101

127

(106)

19.0#

15

10

30

(18)

10.4

37

24

30

(30)

6.5

28

30

26

(28)

2.0

11

7

14

(11)

3.5

 

1.5 µg

122

108

124

(118)

8.7

22

15

21

(19)

3.8

31

27

27

(28)

2.3

22

18

28

(23)

5.0

7

9

9

(8)

1.2

 

5 µg

90

113

99

(101)

11.6

30

11

15

(19)

10.0

26

32

32

(30)

3.5

32

37

28

(32)

4.5

12

5

10

(9)

3.6

 

15 µg

124

97

115

(112)

13.7

17

12

9

(13)

4.0

38

24

31

(31)

7.0

30

38

37

(35)

4.4

12

12

9

(11)

1.7

 

50 µg

134

126

114

(125)

10.1

13

12

19

(15)

3.8

23

24

39

(29)

9.0

31

26

34

(30)

4.0

12

16

6

(11)

5.0

 

150 µg

110

130

129

(123)

11.3

9

19

10

(13)

5.5

28

37

37

(34)

5.2

34

27

28

(30)

3.8

12

10

7

(10)

2.5

 

500 µg

114

115

112

(114)

1.5

22

8

15

(15)

7.0

26

16

16

(19)

5.8

22

25

26

(24)

2.1

16

7

8

(10)

4.9

 

1500 µg

92 S

118 S

90 S

(100)

15.6

13 S

12 S

23 S

(16)

6.1

19 S

17 S

15 S

(17)

2.0

17 S

14 S

14 S

(15)

1.7

4 S

4 S

8 S

(5)

2.3

 

5000 µg

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

0 V

0 V

0 V

(0)

0.0

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

0 T

0 T

0 T

(0)

0.0

Positive controls S9-Mix (+)

 

Name DoseLevel

No. of Revertants

2AA

2AA

2AA

BP

2AA

1 µg

2 µg

10 µg

5 µg

2 µg

1486

1508

1576

(1523)

46.9

246

258

215

(240)

22.2

123

116

105

(115)

9.1

93

114

99

(102)

10.8

216

178

216

(203)

21.9

BP: Benzo(a)pyrene

2AA: 2 -Aminoanthracene

S: Sparse bacterial background lawn

T:Toxic, no bacterial background lawn

V:Very weak bacterial backgroundlawn

#: Standard deviation

Table 5: Historical control data

Strain TA100 TA1535 WP2uvrA TA98 TA1537
Metabolic activation -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9
2017 Combined vehicle
and untreated control
Mean ± SD 92 ± 14.4 92 ± 15.4 18 ± 6.5 17 ± 7.1 25 ± 7.0 31 ± 7.4 22 ± 6.9 26 ± 6.8 13 ± 3.4 14 ± 3.4
Range 61 - 148 63 - 148 8 - 39 8 - 40 7 - 64 13 52 11 - 54 14 - 59 4 - 25 5 - 32
2018 Mean ± SD 122 ± 18.8 125 ± 21.5 17 ± 4.2 14 ± 3.1 27 ± 5.5 36 ± 6.2 22 ± 4.5 27 ± 5.1 12 ± 3.3 13 ± 3.2
Range 67 - 170 64 - 187 7 - 33 9 - 28 11 - 44 20 - 53 11 - 41 15 - 30 5 - 25 3 - 22
2017 Positive control Mean ± SD 769 ± 353.2 1415 ± 553.3 773 ± 556.3 160 ± 71.1 682 ± 231.3 257 ± 132.5 224 ± 62.9 191 ± 83.9 305 ± 132.9 380 ± 113.8
Range 260 - 2374 296 - 3165 83 - 3264 128 - 1035 96 - 1529 83 - 1491 99 - 437 64 - 924 86 - 1239 143 - 1022
2018 Mean ± SD 605 ± 213.6 1726 ± 528.7 653 ± 484.4 301 ± 57.2 706 ± 335.8 230 ± 74.8 212 ± 77.1 158 ± 49.3 274 ± 150.4 294 ± 86.8
Range 220 - 3525 422 - 3928 74 - 2601 113 - 481 111 - 1420 105 -697 97 - 461 79 - 342 86 - 833 116 - 542
Conclusions:
Under the tested conditions, the test compound was not mutagenic in any of the four tested S. typhimurium strains (TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537), nor in the E. coli strain WP2uvrA with and without metabolic activation up to 5000 µg/plate.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

In vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells

Data on in vitro gene mutation in bacteria are available for octan-1-ol, ethoxylated (CAS No. 27252-75-1, EC No. 500-058-1) as well as several member substances of the Alcohol Ethoxylates (AE) category.

 

Study with octan-1-ol, ethoxylated (CAS No. 27252-75-1, EC No. 500-058-1)

The potential of octan-1-ol, ethoxylated (CAS No. 27252-75-1, EC No. 500-058-1) to induce gene mutation in bacteria was tested in a study conducted according to OECD guideline 471 under GLP conditions (Croda, 2019d). S. typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and E. coli strain WP2uvrA were treated with the test item using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at eight dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system. The dose range for experiment 1 (plate incorporation) was 1.5 to 5000 µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day (pre-incubation method) using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. The dose range was the same as in experiment 1. Eight test item concentrations per bacterial strain were selected in experiment 2 in order to achieve both four non toxic dose levels and the toxic limit. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range.  All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with and without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. 5000 µg/plate was the maximum dose level of the test item in the first experiment. The test item induced a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the tester strains at 5000 µg/plate in both the presence and absence of metabolic activation, in the first mutation test. Based on the results of experiment 1, the same maximum dose level was employed in the second mutation test. In the second mutation test, the test item again induced a toxic response with weakened bacterial background lawns noted in the absence of S9-mix from 500 µg/plate (TA100) and 1500 µg/plate (remaining tester strains). In the presence of S9-mix weakened bacterial background lawns were noted to all of the tester strains from 1500 µg/plate. No test item precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9-mix) in experiments 1 and 2. There were no biologically relevant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation in experiment 1. A minor statistical value was noted (TA1537 at 150 µg/plate in the presence of S9-mix). However, this response was within the in-house historical vehicle/untreated control range for the strain and was, therefore considered of no biological relevance. Similarly, no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in experiment 2. The test substance was therefore considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.

 

Studies in the AE category

Studies investigating in vitro gene mutation in bacteria are available for the following AE substances:

 

CAS No.

EC No.

Substance

Study protocol

Hazard conclusion

27252-75-1

500-058-1

Octan-1-ol, ethoxylated

OECD 471

Negative, with and without metabolic activation

68439-50-9

500-213-3

Alcohols, C12-14, ethoxylated

OECD 471

Negative, with and without metabolic activation

Similar OECD 471

Negative, with and without metabolic activation

68439-49-6

939-518-5

Alcohols, C16-18 (even numbered), ethoxylated, < 2.5 EO

OECD 471

Negative, with and without metabolic activation

9005-00-9

500-017-8

Octadecan-1-ol, ethoxylated

Similar OECD 471

Negative, with and without metabolic activation

 

Evaluation of gene mutation in bacteria as observed in studies

All available study results indicate a clear lack of mutagenic potential. No indication of an increase in revertant colony counts is observed in any study. Positive and vehicle control experiments yielded the expected results, demonstrating the adequacy of the test systems and metabolic activation systems. Based on all available data on in vitro gene mutation in bacteria in the AE category, it is predicted that the AE substances are not mutagenic in bacteria either in the presence or the absence of metabolic activation.

This evaluation is considered sufficiently conclusive for the hazard assessment and classification and labelling of the AE substances. For a detailed evaluation of the genotoxic potential of the substances in the AE category, please refer to the category justification attached to the category object.

 

In vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration in mammalian cells

Data on in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration in mammalian cells are not required for octan-1-ol, ethoxylated (CAS No. 27252-75-1, EC No. 500-058-1) in the respective tonnage band of the substance (1 - 10 tpa, Annex VII information requirements). Although legally not required, cytogenicity / chromosome aberration in mammalian cells is discussed here based on a study available in the database of the AE category. An adequate and reliable study investigating in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration in mammalian cells within the AE category is available for alcohols, C16-18 (even numbered), ethoxylated, < 2.5 EO (CAS No. 68439-49-6, EC No. 939-518-5). The study demonstrates the lack of a clastogenic potential. Based on the study, it is concluded that the AE substances are not clastogenic in mammalian cells.

This evaluation is used for the hazard assessment and to conclude on the classification and labelling of the AE substances. For a detailed evaluation of the genotoxic potential of the substances in the AE category, please refer to the category justification attached to the category object.

 

In vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells

Data on in vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells are not required for octan-1-ol, ethoxylated (CAS No. 27252-75-1, EC No. 500-058-1) in the respective tonnage band of the substance (1 - 10 tpa, Annex VII information requirements). Although legally not required, gene mutation in mammalian cells is discussed here based on a study available in the database of the AE category. An adequate and reliable study investigating in vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells within the AE category is available for alcohols, C16-18 (even numbered), ethoxylated, < 2.5 EO (CAS No. 68439-49-6, EC No. 939-518-5). The study demonstrates the lack of a mutagenic potential. Based on the study, it is concluded that the AE substances are not mutagenic in mammalian cells.

This evaluation is used for the hazard assessment and to conclude on the classification and labelling of the AE substances. For a detailed evaluation of the genotoxic potential of the substances in the AE category, please refer to the category justification attached to the category object.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available data on genetic toxicity obtained with octan-1-ol, ethoxylated (CAS No. 27252-75-1, EC No. 500-058-1) and with other members of the Alcohol Ethoxylates (AE) category do not meet the criteria for classification according to the CLP Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.