Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 419-480-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
No irritating effects observed.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 10 January 1995 to 24 January 1995
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted to recent EU and OECD test guidance. GLP is assumed, given the references and QA procedures, although is not specifically mentioned.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 798.4470 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- GLP is assumed, given the references and QA procedures, although is not specifically mentioned.
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Interfauna UK Ltd
- Age at study initiation: Adult
- Weight at study initiation: Average 3.9 kg
- Housing: Individually housed in stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Standard diet, approx 100 - 200g per animal/day; once per day in the monring
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: One week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21
- Humidity (%): 50 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 12 - 15 times per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours, artificial illumination from 6 am to 6 pm - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 500mg moistened with deionised water. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Exposure 4 hours
- Observation period:
- 14 days
- Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6 cm2
- Type of wrap if used: hypoallergenic Hansamed patch
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): With water
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours
SCORING SYSTEM: DRAIZE - Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24, 48, 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: due to staining of the skin was erythema evaluation not possible between day 1 and day 7
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Evaluation of skin erythema was not possible in all three animals due to the intense colouration by the test substance. Nevertheless, no other inflammatory signs (eschar or oedema formation) became apparent within the observation period of 7 days. Signs of toxicity were not observed. This evidence indicates no hazard potential to the skin and the test substance may therefore be regarded as 'not irritating to the skin’.
- Other effects:
- Areas of exposed skin were stained the colour of the test sample.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Substance not irritant.
- Executive summary:
Study conducted to recent EU test guidance 92/69/EEC B4 and OECD Guideline 404.
Test substance was found not to be irritant.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 10 January 1995 to 24 January 1995
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted to recent EU and OECD test guidance. GLP is assumed, given the references and QA procedures, although is not specifically mentioned.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 798.4500 (Acute Eye Irritation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- GLP is assumed, given the references and QA procedures, although is not specifically mentioned.
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Interfauna UK Ltd
- Age at study initiation: Adult
- Weight at study initiation: Average weight 3.8 kg
- Housing: Individually in stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Standard diet, approx 100-120g per animal/day; once per day in the morning
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: one week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21
- Humidity (%): 50 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 12 -15 times per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours, artifical illumination from 6am to 6pm - Vehicle:
- not specified
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): approx 67mg (equivalent to 100 ul test substance) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours exposure
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- three
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Normal saline
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hoours
SCORING SYSTEM: DRAIZE
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein - Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: All animals showed mild effects up to 72 hours. No effects were noted at the end of the exposure period.
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hours.
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72
- Remarks on result:
- other: All animals showed mild effects up to 72 hours. No effects were noted at the end of the exposure period.
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Exposure of the test substance to the eye resulted in all three animals in transient slight conjunctival redness and discharge, and in one animal a very slight oedema was observed too (1 hour after the application). These signs of irritation had subsided in all animals by 72 hours. Cornea and iris showed no lesions or other signs of irritation. No ocular lesions and other signs of toxicity were not observed. This evidence indicates that the product may be considered as 'not irritating to the eye'.
- Other effects:
- Some discolouration occured in conjunctiva of all animals but not sufficient to affect the readings of reactions. Conjunctival swelling was noted in one animal and discharge from the eyes of all animals at the 1 hour reading. These were not noted in remaining assessments.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Substance is not irritating to the eye
- Executive summary:
Study conducted to recent EU test guidance 92/69/EEC B5 & OECD 405.
The substance was found not irritating to the eye.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
Skin irritation / Corrosion.
A single study was evaluated on this endpoint. In these the substance was tested for primary dermal irritation and corrosiveness. Due to staining of the skin, redness etc could not be evaluated, nevertheless, no other inflammatory signs (eschar or oedema formation) became apparent within the observation period of 7 days. Signs of toxicity were not observed. This evidence indicates no hazard potential to the skin and the test substance may therefore be regarded as 'not irritating to the skin’. It is not a dermal corrosive. No risk phrase or classification is required.
Eye irritation.
A single study was evaluated on this endpoint. In these the substance was tested for acute irritation and was found not to be an irritant to the rabbit eye. Effects were noted in all animals assessed; however these were fully reversible within 72 hours. No classification is applicable.
Respiratory irritation
Respiratory irritation was not assessed; however no effects on the animals were noted in any associated studies.
The following information is taken into account for any hazard / risk assessment:
Skin and eye irritation are discussed.
Value used for CSA:
- Skin irritation / corrosion: not irritating
- Eye irritation: not irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
The above studies have all been ranked reliability 1 according to the Klimisch et al system. This ranking was deemed appropriate because the studies were conducted to GLP an in compliance with agreed protocols. Sufficient dose ranges and numbers are detailed; hence it is appropriate for use based on reliability and animal welfare grounds.
The above results triggered no classification under the Dangerous Substance Directive (67/548/EEC) and the CLP Regulation (EC No 1272/2008). No classification for irritation effects is therefore required.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.