Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 800-940-9 | CAS number: 35836-72-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Vapour pressure
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- vapour pressure
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- September 14,2012 to February 08, 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- The result has been considered as reliable without restriction because the test was performed in compliance with OECD and EU guidelines giving scientifically valid results. All measured values show very good reproducibility, giving relative standard deviations of less than 10%, and good correlation. No observations arousing doubts concerning the accuracy of the results and the validity of the study were made.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 104 (Vapour Pressure Curve)
- Version / remarks:
- (2006)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.4 (Vapour Pressure)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of method:
- effusion method: by loss of weight or by trapping vaporisate
- Key result
- Temp.:
- ca. 20 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- ca. 1.33 Pa
- Key result
- Temp.:
- ca. 25 °C
- Vapour pressure:
- ca. 2.63 Pa
- Conclusions:
- The vapour pressure of nopyl acetate was determined as 1.33 Pa at 20 °C and 2.63 Pa at 25 °C.
- Executive summary:
The vapour pressure of nopyl acetate was determined at two different temperatures (30 and 45°C) following EU Method A.4 using the effusion method (weight loss).
First, the determination was performed at 30 °C.
As the apparatus had to be cleaned due to contamination with bubbled over test items and too much test item was already evaporated, freshly filled cells were used for the measurements at 30°C. After three measurement series at 30 °C, the test item was evaporated almost completely. Therefore, the test was continued at 45°C with freshly filled cells and measurement intervals less than 24 hours after consultation of the monitor because the weight loss at 45 °C was too high for the usual time interval of one day. The measured data showed good correlation; therefore, this had no negative influence on the determination.
At each temperature, four knudsen cells were prepared and analysed in the same way.
All measured values show very good reproducibility, giving relative standard deviations of less than 10%, and good correlation. Due to the high volatility of the test item no measurement at more than 45 °C were conducted. The vapour pressure of nopyl acetate was 1.33 Pa at 20°C and 2.63 Pa at 25°C.
Note: the vapour pressure lies in the limit range between the effusion method (10-10 to 1 Pa) and the static method (10 to 105 Pa). Even if the static method is theoretically applicable for vapour pressures of 1 to 10 Pa, this method can be difficult to be performed with terpenes and error-prone in lower pressure ranges as well. Therefore, the effusion method, which was approved in the range of 1 - 5 Pa in some cases, was conducted. As the weight loss was very good reproducible at both temperatures, the result was considered as reliable.
No observations arousing doubts concerning the accuracy of the results and the validity of the study were made. Therefore the result of the test can be considered valid.
Reference
Measurement data at 30°C:
The data of the evaluated experiments is presented in the following tables:
Experiment |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Nom. Temperature |
30 °C |
|
|
|
|
Date and time START |
|
20.Sep.2012 17:45 |
21. Sep.2012 17:00 |
22. Sep.2012 09:30 |
23. Sep.2012 09:02 |
Date and time END |
|
21. Sep.2012 13:45 |
22. Sep.2012 08:30 |
23. Sep.2012 08:05 |
24. Sep.2012 09:40 |
Parameter |
Weight m |
Weight m |
Weight m |
Weight m |
Weight m |
Unit |
g |
g |
g |
g |
g |
Knudsen-cell 1 |
4.16361 |
4.37718 |
4.20459 |
3.96271 |
3.70286 |
Knudsen-cell 2 |
4.13449 |
4.29576 |
4.11586 |
3.86001 |
3.58477 |
Knudsen-cell 3 |
4.08471 |
4.30459 |
4.13531 |
3.89143 |
3.62423 |
Knudsen-cell 4 |
4.04869 |
4.33803 |
4.17223 |
3.92462 |
3.65577 |
Measurement Data at 45°C :
Experiment |
2 |
|
|
|
Nom. Temperature |
45 °C |
|
|
|
Date and time START |
|
25.Sep.2012 17:45 |
26. Sep.2012 09:35 |
26. Sep.2012 12:30 |
Date and time END |
|
26. Sep.2012 07:55 |
26. Sep.2012 12:00 |
26. Sep.2012 15:45 |
Parameter |
Weight m |
Weight m |
Weight m |
Weight m |
Unit |
g |
g |
g |
g |
Knudsen-cell 1 |
4.45065 |
3.35264 |
3.17935 |
2.96654 |
Knudsen-cell 2 |
4.44508 |
3.38713 |
3.22735 |
3.02574 |
Knudsen-cell 3 |
4.40290 |
3.36453 |
3.19914 |
2.99089 |
Knudsen-cell 4 |
4.42146 |
3.38528 |
3.21993 |
3.01644 |
Observations: after three measurement series at 30°C, the cells were almost empty. Therefore, the test was continued with freshly filled cells at 45°C. After the measurements at 45°C, the test item was almost completely evaporated again and the test was finished.
Calculation Results :
All calculation results are given in the tables below:
Experiment |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Temperature in K |
303.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Temperature in °C |
30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Measurement |
21.09.2012 13:45 |
22.09.2012 08:30 |
23.09.2012 08:05 |
24.09.2012 09:40 |
||||||||
Elapsed Time in s |
72000 |
55800 |
81300 |
88680 |
||||||||
Parameter |
Weight loss |
to be used |
Vapour pressure |
Weight loss |
to be used |
Vapour pressure |
Weight loss |
to be used |
Vapour pressure |
Weight loss |
to be used |
Vapour pressure |
Unit |
g |
yes/no |
Pa |
g |
yes/no |
Pa |
g |
yes/no |
Pa |
g |
yes/no |
Pa |
Knudsen-cell 1 |
-0.21357 |
no |
|
0.17259 |
yes |
5.21E+00 |
0.24188 |
yes |
5.01E+00 |
0.25985 |
yes |
4.94E+00 |
Knudsen-cell 2 |
-0.16127 |
no |
|
0.17990 |
yes |
5.43E+00 |
0.25585 |
yes |
5.30E+00 |
0.27524 |
yes |
5.23E+00 |
Knudsen-cell 3 |
-0.21988 |
no |
|
0.16928 |
yes |
5.11E+00 |
0.24388 |
yes |
5.06E+00 |
0.26720 |
yes |
5.08E+00 |
Knudsen-cell 4 |
-0.28934 |
no |
|
0.16580 |
yes |
5.01E+00 |
0.24761 |
yes |
5.13E+00 |
0.26885 |
yes |
5.11E+00 |
Mean |
|
|
|
|
yes |
5.19E+00 |
|
|
5.13E+00 |
|
|
5.09E+00 |
Standard deviation: |
|
|
|
|
|
1.82E-01 |
|
|
1.28E-01 |
|
|
1.20E-01 |
Mean of measured values: |
|
5.135E+00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard deviation: |
|
5.188E-02 |
RSD: |
1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If “no” is stated in the respective column: measurement was not considered for the calculation of the mean. The “first” measurement series at
30°C was not used for evaluation as the measurements at 30°C had to be started again with fresh cells.
Experiment |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Temperature in K |
318.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Temperature in °C |
45.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of Measurement |
26.09.2012 07:55 |
26.09.2012 12:00 |
26.09.2012 15:45 |
||||||
Elapsed Time in s |
51000 |
8700 |
11700 |
||||||
Parameter |
Weight loss |
to be used |
Vapour pressure |
Weight loss |
to be used |
Vapour pressure |
Weight loss |
to be used |
Vapour pressure |
Unit |
g |
yes/no |
Pa |
g |
yes/no |
Pa |
g |
yes/no |
Pa |
Knudsen-cell 1 |
1.09801 |
yes |
3.72E+01 |
0.17329 |
yes |
3.44E+01 |
0.21281 |
yes |
3.14E+01 |
Knudsen-cell 2 |
1.05795 |
yes |
3.58E+01 |
0.15978 |
yes |
3.17E+01 |
0.20161 |
yes |
2.97E+01 |
Knudsen-cell 3 |
1.03837 |
yes |
3.51E+01 |
0.16539 |
yes |
3.28E+01 |
0.20825 |
yes |
3.07E+01 |
Knudsen-cell 4 |
1.03618 |
yes |
3.51E+01 |
0.16535 |
yes |
3.28E+01 |
0.20349 |
yes |
3.00E+01 |
Mean |
|
yes |
3.58E+01 |
|
yes |
3.29E+01 |
|
yes |
3.05E+01 |
Standard deviation: |
|
|
9.70E-01 |
|
|
1.10E+00 |
|
|
7.42E-01 |
Mean of measured values: |
|
3.307E+01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard deviation: |
|
2.665E+00 |
RSD: |
8.1% |
|
|
|
|
Evaluation :
The measured values for temperature and vapour pressure were evaluated as follows:
Parameter |
T |
P |
1/T |
log p |
Unit |
K |
Pa |
1/K |
log Pa |
Values |
303.2 |
5.14E+00 |
3.2982E-03 |
0.7106 |
318.2 |
3.31E+01 |
3.1427E-03 |
1.5194 |
For these two temperatures, 1/T was plotted against log (P).The plotted graph 1/T vs. log (P) shows a straight line with a correlation coefficientof - 1.0000 as only two temperatures could be evaluated.
Parameters of the linear regression :
Parameter |
Value |
Slope |
-5202.4 |
Intercept |
17.8690 |
Correlation Coefficient r |
-1.0000 |
y = -5202.4x + 17.869 (R² = 1)
Results:
The following vapour pressures were determined experimentally and considered as valid (mean and standard deviation given):
T |
T |
P |
Stand. Dev. P |
RSD P |
°C |
K |
Pa |
Pa |
% |
30.0 |
303.2 |
5.14E+00 |
5.19E-02 |
1.0% |
45.0 |
318.2 |
3.31E+01 |
2.67E+00 |
8.1% |
For the test item nopyl acetate, the following vapour pressures at 20 °C and at 25 °C were calculated from the regression equation:
Vapour pressure at 20 °C: |
1.33Pa |
Vapour pressure at 25 °C: |
2.63Pa |
The linear regression of log p vs. 1/T gave a correlation coefficient r of - 1.0000 as only two temperatures could be evaluated.
Description of key information
The vapour pressure was determined by the effusion method (weight loss).
The vapour pressure of nopyl acetate is 1.33 Pa at 20 °C and 2.63 Pa at 25 °C.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Vapour pressure:
- 1.33 Pa
- at the temperature of:
- 20 °C
Additional information
Key study conducted according to OECD 104 Guideline and EU Method A.4, under GLP without deviation. No observations arousing doubts concerning the accuracy of the results and the validity of the study were made. Therefore, the study was considered as reliable without restriction and the extrapolated vapour pressures at 20 and 25°C can be used as key values for chemical safety assessment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.