Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 107 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), Shake Flask Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
flask method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,2,4-triazole-3-thiol
EC Number:
221-656-6
EC Name:
1,2,4-triazole-3-thiol
Cas Number:
3179-31-5
Molecular formula:
C2H3N3S
IUPAC Name:
4H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiol
Test material form:
solid: crystalline

Study design

Analytical method:
high-performance liquid chromatography

Results and discussion

Partition coefficient
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
-0.398
Temp.:
21 °C
pH:
5

Any other information on results incl. tables

1.1     Overview of Determinations

The POWfor each determination, the mean, standard deviation and relative standard deviation of the six determinations are presented in the following table.

Table 10.1‑a    POW

Step

POW

Mean POWStep

Mean POW

Standard Deviation

Relative Standard Deviation

1a

0.39

0.39

0.40

0.012

3.0%

1b

0.39

2a

0.41

0.40

2b

0.40

3a

0.42

0.41

3b

0.40

 

The log POWfor each determination, the mean, standard deviation and relative standard deviation of the six determinations is presented in the following table.

Table 10.1‑b    log POW

Step

log POW

Mean Log POW

Step

Mean log POW

Range

Standard Deviation

Relative Standard Deviation

1a

-0.410

-0.412

-0.398

0.025

0.013

3.3%

1b

-0.414

2a

-0.391

-0.395

2b

-0.398

3a

-0.380

-0.387

3b

-0.393

 

1.2     log POW

The log POWof the test item3-Mercapto-1,2,4-triazolewas calculated as (log POW± standard deviation):

 

-0.398 ± 0.013

1.3     Validity

The six log POWs should lie in a range of ± 0.3 units.

The range was 0.025, corresponding to range ± 0.013

 


1.4     Mass Balance

The mass balances of the individual determinations are presented in the following table.

Table10.4‑aMass Balances

Step

Amount in n-Octanol [mg]

Amount inBuffer pH 5 [mg]

Total
Amount
[mg]

Nominal Amount [mg]

Difference [mg]

Difference

Recovery

1a

3.02

 15.542  

18.57

18.00

0.57

3.1%

103.1%

1b

2.98

 15.433  

18.41

18.00

0.41

2.3%

102.3%

2a

1.71

 16.827  

18.54

18.00

0.54

3.0%

103.0%

2b

1.66

 16.662  

18.33

18.00

0.33

1.8%

101.8%

3a

5.44

 13.056  

18.49

18.00

0.49

2.7%

102.7%

3b

5.39

 13.321  

18.71

18.00

0.71

4.0%

104.0%

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The analytical method showed good correlation coefficients and the measured concentrations lie in the working ranges. Therefore, the determination of the concentration of 3-Mercapto-1,2,4-triazole in n-octanol and buffer pH 5 can be considered valid.
The mass balance shows discrepancies below 5% at all three steps. These differences might be due to the measurement uncertainties of analytical instruments and of sample preparation.
The range of the determined log POWs was 0.025, corresponding to range of ± 0.013. Therefore, the determination was valid.
The determination of log POW using the shake flask method is possible in the range of -2 and 4. The log POW of the test item 3-Mercapto-1,2,4-triazole was stated as
-0.398 ± 0.013 (log POW ± standard deviation).
Executive summary:

The study was performed using the flask method. Partition coefficient was determined using n-octanol, saturated with Buffer pH 5 and buffer pH 5, saturated with n-octanol.

Three volume ratios of buffer pH 5 / n-octanol (saturated phases) (ratios 4 : 1, 2 : 1 and 1 : 1) were tested in duplicate.

The separated phases were analysed using HPLC as described in chapter 6.4.

The measurements of the phases gave the following log POWof the test item at the respective ratio:

Table3-a        Results

Ratio1

Step log POW

Mean log POW

Standard Deviation

Relative Standard Deviation

4 : 1

-0.395

-0.398

0.013

3.3%

2 : 1

-0.412

1 : 1

-0.387

1Ratio of buffer pH 5 / n-octanol (saturated phases)

The test was performed at 21°C.