Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
June 12,2019 - July 9,2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Version / remarks:
July 28, 2015
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Benzotriazole-1-yl-oxy-tris-pyrrolidino-phosphonium hexafluorophosphate
EC Number:
603-290-2
Cas Number:
128625-52-5
Molecular formula:
C18H28N6OP2F6
IUPAC Name:
Benzotriazole-1-yl-oxy-tris-pyrrolidino-phosphonium hexafluorophosphate

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: The SkinEthic™ RHE-model RHE/S/17 was obtained from Episkin/SkinEthic Laboratories, Lyon, France.
- Tissue batch number(s): 19-RHE-110

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: 37°C

REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
- Volume and number of washing steps: 25 mL DPBS
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: no

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 hours (± 5 minutes)
- Wavelength: 570 nm

FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS
- Viability: OD 1.3(CV= 1.7%)
- Barrier function: ET50=5.9h
- Morphology: Multi-layered, highly differentiated epidermis consisting of basal, spinous and granular layers, and a multi-layered stratum corneum.

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3

NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: 1

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA
A test item is considered as non-irritant to skin (UN GHS No Category) if the tissue viability after exposure and post-treatment incubation is > 50%.
A test item is identified as requiring classification and labelling according to UN GHS (Category 2 or Category 1) if the mean percent tissue viability after exposure and post-treatment incubation is < 50%. Since the in vitro skin irritation test according to OECD 439 cannot resolve between UN GHS Categories 1 and 2, further information on skin corrosion is required to decide on its final classification.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 16 mg ± 2 mg per tissue

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 16 µL ± 0.5 uL per tissue

POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied: 16 µL ± 0.5 uL per tissue
Duration of treatment / exposure:
42 minutes (± 1 minute)
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
42 hours (± 1 hour)
Number of replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
1st experiment
Value:
64.6
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
100%
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
1.3%
Other effects / acceptance of results:
- Visible damage on test system: No
- Direct-MTT reduction: No
- Colour interference with MTT: No

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Yes
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: Yes

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Results

Group

Tissue 1

Tissue 2

Tissue 3

Mean

SD

 

 

OD

viability

OD

viability

OD

viability

OD

viability

viability

Negative
Control

1.845

1057%

1.753

100.5%

1.638

93.9%

1.745

100.0%

5.9%

Positive
Control

0.023

1.3%

0.025

1.4%

0.021

1.2%

0.023

1.3%

7.7%

Test item

1.098

62.9%

1.087

62.3%

1.199

68.7%

1.128

64.6%

5.4%

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the present study, the test item is not considered to possess an irritant potential to skin.
Executive summary:

A study was performed according to the OECD TG 439 to investigate the potential of the test item to induce skin irritation in an in vitro human skin model.

The test item was applied topically to a human reconstructed skin model followed by determination of the cell viability. Cell viability was determined by enzymatic conversion of vital dye MTT into a blue formazan salt and measurement of the formazan salt after extraction from tissues. The percent reduction of cell viability in comparison to untreated negative controls was used to predict the skin irritation potential.

Triplicates of the human skin RHE-model were treated with the test item, the negative or the positive control for 42 minutes (± 1 minute). 16 µL of either the negative control (DPBS-buffer) or the positive control (5% aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate) were applied to the tissues. Before application of 16 mg of the solid test item, 10 µL of deionised water was spread to the epidermis surface to improve the contact between the test item and the epidermis.

All acceptability criteria after treatment with the negative control (DPBS-buffer) and the positive control (5% aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate) were met.

Following treatment with the test item, the tissue viability was 64.6% and, thus, higher than 50%, i.e. according to OECD 439 the test item is considered as non-irritant to skin (UN GHS: No Category).