Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-237-9 | CAS number: -
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- August 1982
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 982
- Report date:
- 1982
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other: variation of Magnusson and Kligman method
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- An LLNA study was not performed because there is an existing reliable study for skin sensitisation using the Guinea Pig Maximisation test method.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Etidronic acid
- EC Number:
- 220-552-8
- EC Name:
- Etidronic acid
- Cas Number:
- 2809-21-4
- Molecular formula:
- C2H8O7P2
- IUPAC Name:
- (1-hydroxyethylidene)bisphosphonic acid
- Test material form:
- not specified
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Pirbright-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Induction
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: water, Freund's Adjuvant (intradermal induction) and Vaseline (topical induction and challenge)
- Concentration / amount:
- 5% induction, 25% challenge
Challenge
- Route:
- epicutaneous, semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- other: water, Freund's Adjuvant (intradermal induction) and Vaseline (topical induction and challenge)
- Concentration / amount:
- 5% induction, 25% challenge
- No. of animals per dose:
- 20 test and 20 controls
- Details on study design:
- 1st application: Induction 5 % intracutaneous
2nd application: Induction 5 % occlusive epicutaneous
3rd application: Challenge 25 % semiocclusive
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- No. with + reactions:
- 8
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- No. with + reactions:
- 5
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
Any other information on results incl. tables
TEST SUBSTANCE GROUP RESPONSES
24 hours: 8 animals (erythema: grade 1 - slight redness)
48 hours: 5 animals (erythema: grade 1 - slight redness)
72 hours: 0 animals displaying symptoms
CONTROL GROUP RESPONSES
24 hours: 6 animals (erythema: grade 1 - slight redness)
48 hours: 2 animals (erythema: grade 1 - slight redness)
72 hours: 0 animals displaying symptoms
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- In a guinea-pig maximisation study (reliability score 2), not conducted to GLP, sodium salt of HEDP was not sensitising to the skin.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
