Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin irritation (OECD 439): not irritating

Eye irritation (OECD 437): not irritating

Read-acrross from isomaltulose (CAS 13718 -94 -0)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
refer to analogue approach justification provided in IUCLID section 13
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Remarks:
mean value of 3 tissues
Run / experiment:
15 min
Value:
95
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
Source: CAS 13718-94-0, Lehmeier, 2012, EpiSkin
Interpretation of results:
other: non-irritant according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
Under the conditions of the reconstructed human epidermis test the test item does not possess iritant properties. Applying the read-across approach, similar results are expected for the target substance.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
30 Oct 2012
Justification for type of information:
refer to analogue justification provided in IUCLID section 13
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 corneas each for the test item, negative and positive controls
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Value:
0.75
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Remarks:
Source: CAS 13718-94-0, Luetkenhaus, 2013, BCOP
Interpretation of results:
other: non-irritant to the eye according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
Under the conditions of the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) Test the test item does not possess eye iritant properties. Applying the read-across approach, similar results are expected for the target substance.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for read-across

There are no experimental data available regarding skin and eye irritation/corrosion for Reaction mass of 1-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-D-mannitol and 6-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-D-glucitol. Thus, read-across from an appropriate surrogate substance (isomaltulose, CAS 13718-94-0) is conducted in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI, 1.5 in order to fulfil the standard information requirements defined in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex VII and VIII, 8.1. Common functional groups and structural similarities of the source and target substance are the basis of read-across. A detailed justification for the analogue read-across approach is provided in the technical dossier (see IUCLID Section 13).

Skin irritation in vitro

The skin irritation potential of isomaltulose (CAS 13718-94-0) was determined in a GLP-compliant in vitro skin irritation test according to OECD 439 on EpiSkinTM human skin equivalents (SkinEthic laboratories, Lyon, France) after moistening (Lehmeier, 2012). After exposure to 10 mg isomaltulose and a post-incubation period of 42 h, cytotoxicity measurements revealed a relative mean tissue viability of 95% compared to the respective controls. In contrast, application of the positive control substance SDS (5%) reduced the relative tissue cell viability to 7% of the control tissues thereby validating the study. In accordance with the classification criteria given in OECD guideline 439 and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, isomalutlose is considered as non-irritant.

Furthermore, no signs of skin irritation were noted in a Local Lymph Node Assay conducted with isomaltulose. Thus, together with the available data on in vitro skin irritation, there is sufficient weight of evidence available leading to the conclusion that isomaltulose and hence isomalt is not irritating to skin.

Based on the available data on the surrogate substance isomaltulose, Reaction mass of 1-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-D-mannitol and 6-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-D-glucitol is not considered to exhibit irritating properties to the skin.

Eye irritation in vitro

The eye irritation/corrosion potential of isomaltulose (CAS 13718-94-0) was tested in a GLP-compliant in vitro bovine corneal opacity and permeability test according to OECD 437 (Lütkenhaus, 2013). 750 µL of the test item solution, 20% dissolved in 0.9% NaCl, were introduced into the anterior chamber of the corneal holders for 4 h. Subsequent measurements after rinsing revealed a mean opacity value of 1.33 and a mean permeability value of 0.028 resulting in an in vitro irritancy score (IVIS) of 0.75. According to the evaluation criteria given in OECD 437, the conducted in vitro test did not identify isomaltulose as an ocular irritant.

Based on the available data on the surrogate substance isomaltulose, Reaction mass of 1-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-D-mannitol and 6-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-D-glucitol is not considered to exhibit irritating properties to the eye.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on read-across, the available data on skin or eye irritation are conclusive but not sufficient for classification

according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.