Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 2018-12-10 to 2018-12-17, with the definitive exposure phase from 2018-12-11 to 2018-12-14
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,2'-[[4-[(2-bromo-6-chloro-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-3-chlorophenyl]imino]bisethanol
EC Number:
241-481-9
EC Name:
2,2'-[[4-[(2-bromo-6-chloro-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-3-chlorophenyl]imino]bisethanol
Cas Number:
17464-91-4
Molecular formula:
C16H15BrCl2N4O4
IUPAC Name:
2,2'-[[4-[(2-bromo-6-chloro-4-nitrophenyl)azo]-3-chlorophenyl]imino]bisethanol
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
Determination of the test item
Samples were analyzed with a HPLC-DAD method, implemented under non-GLP and documented finally in the GLP raw data.

Sampling schedule
All concentration levels and the control were analytically verified via HPLC-DAD at the start (0 hours) and at the end of the exposure (72 hours) with algae.

Sampling and pre-treatment
At the start, samples were taken from one additional replicate of the test item concentration and the control and at the end samples were taken from pooled replicates.

Criteria for the analytical monitoring (target)
Recoveries of the test item are not within ± 20% of the initially measured concentrations.

Test solutions

Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
Preparation of the Saturated solution
A saturated solution with a nominal loading of 100 mg test item/L was prepared once 24 ± 1 hour prior to the start of the exposure. An appropriate amount of the test item was weighed out. The test item was applied onto a glass slide. The glass slide with the test item was inserted into a glass bottle with an appropriate amount of dilution water. The saturated solution was stirred for 24 ± 1 hour (1100 rpm, at room temperature) with a magnetic stirrer. Undissolved particles were removed by membrane filtration (membrane filter 0.45 µm, RC, MACHEREY-NAGEL). The filter was saturated in order to avoid adsorption during the filtration. The first 25 mL of the filtrate were discarded. The filtration was interrupted for 15 minutes to allow adsorption and saturation of the filter material with dissolved test item. Thereafter, the filtration was continued. The next 25 mL were discarded. During filtration, the filter was always kept covered.
The solution was checked via laser beam (Tyndall effect). The Tyndall effect was negative.

Test loading
All terms related to concentration level are given as loading level because partly dissolved compounds and mixtures cannot be related to concentrations. The saturated solution and five dilution levels out of the saturated solution were tested in a geometrical series with a dilution factor of √10: 0.316 - 1.00 - 3.16 - 10.0 - 31.6 - 100% of the saturated solution. The test loadings are based on the results of a non-GLP preliminary range finding test.

Control
Six replicates (without test item) were incubated under the same conditions as the test item replicates.

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata HINDÁK, CCAP 278/4
- Strain: CCAP 278/4
- Source (laboratory, culture collection):
Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP)
SAMS Research Services Ltd
Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory
Dunbeg, OBAN; Argyll PA37 1QA; Scotland, UK

- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): 4 days
- Method of cultivation: Fresh stocks were prepared every month on Z-Agar. Light intensity amounted to 2567 – 5130 lux corresponding to 35 - 70 µE ∙ m-2 ∙ s-1 for 24 h per day.


Study design

Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Post exposure observation period:
No

Test conditions

Test temperature:
min.: 22.0 max.: 23.0 mean value: 22.5
pH:
Nominal test item loading pH-values
[% of the saturated solution] Start; 0 hours End; 72 hours
100 7.91 7.70
31.6 7.90 7.69
10.0 7.89 7.90
3.16 7.92 8.06
1.00 7.93 8.12
0.316 7.95 8.40
Control 7.97 8.89
Salinity:
Not measured, freshwater conditions
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks
- Type (delete if not applicable): open, cotton wool plugs
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: sterile 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, test volume 100 mL
- Aeration: Test containers were placed on a rotary shaker and oscillated at appr. 70 rpm
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): None
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): One application at test start
- Initial cells density: Nominal: approximately 2 - 5 x 10^3 cells/mL, Actual: mean 6442 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: Mean 1607801 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6


GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes


TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water:

Ultrapure water was used to prepare the dilution water (conductivity max. 0.1 µS/cm)
Composition of Dilution Water
according to the guideline
Component Concentration [mg/L]
NH4Cl 15
MgCl2 x 6 H2O 12
CaCl2 x 2 H2O 18
MgSO4 x 7 H2O 15
KH2PO4 1.6
FeCl3 x 6 H2O 0.064a2EDTA x 2 H2O 0.1
H3BO3 0.185
MnCl2 x 4 H2O 0.415
ZnCl2 3 x 10^-3
Na2MoO4 x 2 H2O 7 x 10^-3
CoCl2 x 6 H2O 1.5 x 10^-3
CuCl2 x 2 H2O 1 x 10^-5
NaHCO3 50
pH 8.1 ± 0.2



OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 24 h
- Light intensity and quality: Approximately 4440 to 8880 lux, corresponding to 60 to 120
µE ∙ m-2 ∙ s-1, mean value: 5873 lux,measured: 5064 - 6585 lux



EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
-Chlorophyll a-fluorescence
The cell density was measured daily via Chlorophyll a-fluorescence, excitation at 436 nm, emission at 685 nm. Dilution water was used as a background signal. No self-fluorescence was found in the preliminary range finding test in the saturated solution.
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
(Potassium dichromate)

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
other: NOEL
Effect conc.:
10 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: growth rate and yield
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
other: LOEL
Effect conc.:
31.6 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: growth rate and yield
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
25.6
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: yield
Remarks on result:
other: CI: 18.2 - 36.4
Details on results:
- Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test):
- Unusual cell shape: No
- Colour differences: No
- Flocculation: No
- Adherence to test vessels: No
- Aggregation of algal cells: No
- Other: The test media were clear and concentration related slightly orange coloured throughout the test period (possible turbidity related to algae growth not taken into account).
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: No
Results with reference substance (positive control):
The toxicity of potassium dichromate (SIGMA ALDRICH, batch number MKBV0900V, purity 99.0%, CAS RN 7778-50-9) to the unicellular freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was determined over a period of 72 hours from 2018-09-25 to 2018-09-28. The reference item toxicity is in the valid range which was established by calculation of the average of the historic reference data since 2005, and the limits were set using the threefold standard deviation of these values.

EC50-Values of the Reference Item
based on nominal concentrations mg/L, (0-72 hours)
Current Study Valid Range (average ± 3 x SD)
Growth Rate inhibition
ErC50 0.799 0.753 ± 0.544
95% confidence interval 0.707 – 1.30
Yield inhibition
EyC50 0.607 0.407 ± 0.313
95% confidence interval 0.404 – 0.694
SD = Standard deviation
Reported statistics and error estimates:
EL-values and statistical analyses
EL-values of growth rate and yield inhibition after 72 hours with confidence intervals were calculated by sigmoidal dose-response regression.

NOEC, LOEC and analyses
The NOEC / LOEC was determined by calculation of statistical significance of growth rate and yield.
The following statistical tests were conducted:

Shapiro-Wilk’s test on normal distribution was done with a significance level of 0.01.
Levene’s test on variance homogeneity was done with a significance level of 0.01.
Monotonicity of Concentration/Response was calculated by Trend Analysis by Contrasts (significance level 0.05) for yield.
Monotonicity of Concentration/Response was calculated by non-parametric trend analysis by contrasts (significance level 0.05) for growth rate.
Williams Multiple Sequential t-test Procedure was performed with a significance level of 0.05 for yield.

Step-down Jonckheere-Terpstra test procedure was done with a significance level 0.05 for growth rate.

Software
The data for the tables in this report were computer-generated and have been rounded for presentation from the full derived data. Consequently, if calculated manually based on the given data minor deviations may occur from these figures.
Calculations were carried out using software
- Excel, MICROSOFT CORPORATION
- SigmaPlot, SPSS INC.
- GraphPad Prism, GRAPHPAD SOFTWARE, INC.
- ToxRat Professional, Version 3.3.0, TOXRAT SOLUTIONS GMBH

Any other information on results incl. tables

Microscopic evaluation of the cells at the start and end of exposure revealed no morphological abnormalities. All effect values are given based on the nominal test item loadings.

 

Cell Densities

Nominal test item loading

Replicate

Cell density [cells/mL]

[% of the saturated solution]

No.

0 hours

24 hours

48 hours

72 hours

100

1

6442

6303

20945

135244

2

6442

5586

18264

127484

3

6442

5744

17963

138298

Mean

6442

5878

19057

133675

 31.6

1

6442

11690

65796

537285

2

6442

12013

68092

709322

3

6442

14627

78569

713518

Mean

6442

12777

70819

653375

 10.0

1

6442

18770

167090

1468620

2

6442

17323

129063

1443770

3

6442

15498

104982

1219650

Mean

6442

17197

133712

1377347

   3.16

1

6442

15322

141247

1406085

2

6442

17961

172770

1824287

3

6442

26240

137285

1317286

Mean

6442

19841

150434

1515886

   1.00

1

6442

21742

190976

1523830

2

6442

20903

158490

1644033

3

6442

4108

172149

1172929

Mean

6442

15584

173872

1446931

   0.316

1

6442

27561

166901

1709422

2

6442

24654

170083

1945582

3

6442

22476

199620

1604139

Mean

6442

24897

178868

1753048

Control

1

6442

24160

171573

1874484

2

6442

25227

181026

1736804

3

6442

23517

175024

1609427

4

6442

15645

82536

1868997

5

6442

24199

171101

1666698

6

6442

17899

101333

929048

Mean

6442

21775

147099

1614243

 


Evaluation after 72 hours

Statistically significant differences of growth rates and yield compared to control values are marked (+), not significant differences are marked (-).

 

Nominal test item loading

Replicate

Growth rate

Inhibition of growth rate

Yield

Inhibition of yield

[% of the saturated solution]

No.

[d-1]

[%]

[cells/mL]

[%]

100

1

 

1.02

45

 

128802

92

2

 

1.00

46

 

121042

92

3

 

1.02

44

 

131856

92

Mean

(+)

1.01

45

(+)

127233

92

 31.6

1

 

1.48

20

 

530843

67

2

 

1.57

14

 

702880

56

3

 

1.57

14

 

707076

56

Mean

(+)

1.54

16

(+)

646933

60

 10.0

1

 

1.81

1

 

1462178

9

2

 

1.80

2

 

1437328

11

3

 

1.75

5

 

1213208

25

Mean

(+)*

1.79

2

(-)

1370905

15

   3.16

1

 

1.80

2

 

1399643

13

2

 

1.88

-3

 

1817845

-13

3

 

1.77

3

 

1310844

18

Mean

(-)

1.82

1

(-)

1509444

6

   1.00

1

 

1.82

1

 

1517388

6

2

 

1.85

-1

 

1637591

-2

3

 

1.74

5

 

1166487

27

Mean

(-)

1.80

2

(-)

1440489

10

   0.316

1

 

1.86

-2

 

1702980

-6

2

 

1.90

-4

 

1939140

-21

3

 

1.84

0

 

1597697

1

Mean

(-)

1.87

-2

(-)

1746606

-9

Control

1

 

1.89

 

 

1868042

 

2

 

1.87

 

 

1730362

 

3

 

1.84

 

 

1602985

 

4

 

1.89

 

 

1862555

 

5

 

1.85

 

 

1660256

 

6

 

1.66

 

 

922606

 

Mean

 

1.83

 

 

1607801

 

* = statistically significant but biologically not relevant (< 5% inhibition)

 


Section-by-Section and Average Specific Growth Ratesof the Control Group (0 - 72 hours)

 

Replicate No.

Specific growth rate [d-1]

Mean

(0 - 72 hours)

SD

±

CV
[%]

Mean CV [%]

section-by-section

0 - 24 hours

24 - 48 hours

48 - 72 hours

Control

1

1.32

1.96

2.39

1.89

0.538

28.4

33.6

2

1.37

1.97

2.26

1.87

0.457

24.5

3

1.30

2.01

2.22

1.84

0.484

26.3

4

0.89

1.66

3.12

1.89

1.134

60.0

5

1.32

1.96

2.28

1.85

0.485

26.2

6

1.02

1.73

2.22

1.66

0.601

36.2

 

 

 

Mean

1.83

 

 

 

 

 

SD ±

0.09

 

 

 

 

CV [%]

4.82

 

 

SD = Standard deviation CV = Coefficient of variation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
In this study, Disperse Brown 4 was found to inhibit the growth of the freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata after 72 hours with the following effect values (based on nominal test item loadings): The EL50-values with 95% confidence intervals for inhibition of growth rate (ErL50) and yield (EyL50) after 72 hours were > 100 and 25.6 (18.2 – 36.4)% of the saturated solution, respectively. The NOEL-values for both inhibition of growth rate and yield after 72 hours were 10.0% of the saturated solution, respectively. The effect levels are above the water solubility limit.
Executive summary:

The toxicity of Disperse Brown 4 to the unicellular freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was determined according to the principles of OECD 201 and Council Regulation (EC) No. 266/2016 C.3 from 2018-12-10 to 2018-12-17, with the definitive exposure phase from 2018-12-11 to 2018-12-14 at the test facility.The aim of the study was the determination of NOEL, LOEL, EL10, EL20- and EL50-values of growth rate and yield over a period of 72 hours.

 

The study was conducted under static conditions with an initial cell density of 6442 cells/mL. A saturated solution with a nominal loading of 100 mg test item/L was prepared with dilution water 24±1 hour prior to the start of the exposure. An appropriate amount of the test item was weighed out. The saturated solution was stirred for 24 ±1hour (1100 rpm, at room temperature) with a magnetic stirrer. Undissolved particles were removed by membrane filtration. The following filtrate, i.e. the saturated solution was used in the test.The solution was checked via laser beam (Tyndall effect). The Tyndall effect was negative.

 

The saturated solution and five dilution levels out of the saturated solution were tested in the definitive test in a geometrical series with a dilution factor of√10:0.316 - 1.00 - 3.16 - 10.0 - 31.6 - 100% of the saturated solution. Three replicates were tested for each test item concentration and six replicates for the control. The test media were clear and concentration related slightly orange coloured throughout the test period. The environmental conditions were within the acceptable limits.

 

The concentrations of thetest item in all test concentrations and the control were analytically verified by HPLC-DAD at the start and at the end of the exposure.
The measured concentrations of the test item at the start of the exposure (0 hours) were < LOQ (0.14 mg/L) to 0.444 mg/L. The measured concentrations in the old media (72 h) were in the range of < LOQ to 82% of the initially values in all tested concentration levels.

 

All effect values given are based on the nominal test item loadings of DisperseBrown 4.


 NOEL, LOEL, ELx-values and 95% Confidence Intervals of DisperseBrown 4 (0 - 72 hours)

 based on the nominal test item loadings

 

Growth Rate Inhibition
nominal test item loadings [% saturated solution]

NOEL

10.0

LOEL

31.6

ErL10

22.5 (16.5 – 26.9)

ErL20

37.6 (32.5 – 48.5)

ErL50

> 100

 

Yield Inhibition

nominal test item loadings [% saturated solution]

NOEL

10.0

LOEL

31.6

EyL10

7.16 (< 0.316 – 14.0)

EyL20

11.7 (6.60 – 18.1)

EyL50

25.6 (18.2 – 36.4)