Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 941-364-9 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2021-SEP-16 to 2022-SEP-21
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 022
- Report date:
- 2022
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- June 2018
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviations did not impact the overall integrity of the study or the interpretation of the study results and conclusions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- May 2008
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviations did not impact the overall integrity of the study or the interpretation of the study results and conclusions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- August 1998
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviations did not impact the overall integrity of the study or the interpretation of the study results and conclusions.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Petroleum gas oil fraction, co-processed with renewable hydrocarbons of plant and/or animal origin
- EC Number:
- 941-364-9
- Molecular formula:
- Not applicable to UVCB substance
- IUPAC Name:
- Petroleum gas oil fraction, co-processed with renewable hydrocarbons of plant and/or animal origin
- Test material form:
- other: Low visocosity, liquid hydrocarbon
- Details on test material:
- Batch number: 204377961
Physical description: Colourless or pale yellow coloured liquid
Purity: 100% UVCB
Expiry date: 20 August 2022 if kept under storge conditions
Source and site of characterisation: Repsol Refinery, Carretera de la Calzada s/n, Apartado de Correos 12, 13500 Puertollano, Ciudad Real, Spain
Storage conditions: Store under controlled humidity conditions and temperature (18-25 °C) in a sealed container, protecting the product from sunlight (opaque container or in a cabinet)
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source (i.e. manufacturer or supplier) and lot/batch number of test material: Shell Global Solutions (Spain); Batch number: 204377961
- Purity, including information on contaminants, isomers, etc.: 100% (UVCB)
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature
- Stability and homogeneity of the test material in the vehicle/solvent under test conditions (e.g. in the exposure medium) and during storage: Stable for at least 24 hours at room temperature under normal laboratory light conditions and for at least 8 days in the refrigerator over the concentration range 2 to 800 mg/mL (solutions).
FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST (if different from that of starting material): Liquid
OTHER SPECIFICS
- Expiration Date: 2022-Aug-20
- Specific gravity: 0.8319
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Remarks:
- CRL:WI(Han)
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories Deutschland (Sulzfeld, Germany)
- Age at study initiation: Young adult females, 11-15 weeks old at mating
- Weight at study initiation: 201 - 269 g at onset of treatment
- Fasting period before study: Not specified
- Housing: Individually housed in Makrolon type III polycarbonate cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted SM R/M-Z (Ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, D-59494 Soest, Germany) ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Municipal tap water (in water bottles) ad libitum
- Acclimation period:5- 6 days before the commencement of dosing
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-20°C (target: 18 to 24°C)
- Humidity (%): 45-69% (target: 40-70%)
- Air changes (per hr): 10 or more air exchanges/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2021-SEP-22/24 To: 2021-OCT-15
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Remarks:
- Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany)
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test material was formulated in the vehicle (corn oil). The formulations were homogenised to visibly acceptable levels at appropriate concentrations to meet dose level requirements. Formulations were prepared at least weekly, filled out in daily portions and stored in a refrigerator. The dosing formulations were removed from the refrigerator and stirred at room temperature for at least 30 minutes before dosing. Test item dosing formulations were kept at room temperature until dosing. If practically possible, the dosing formulations and vehicle were continuously stirred until and during dosing. Adjustment was made for specific gravity of the vehicle (0.92) and test item (0.8319). No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test item as it is a UVCB.
A dose volume of 4 mL/kg body weight was administered to all dose groups, including the controls. The individual volume of the treatment was based on the most recent individual body weight of the animals.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Based on results of the trial formulation, corn oil was selected as vehicle for this study
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 25, 75, or 250 mg/mL for the 0, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg bw/day dose levels, respectively.
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 4 mL/kg body weight
- Lot/batch no. (if required): Source: Sigma-Aldrich; Batch Number: MKCN9742
- Purity: Not specified - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Dose formulation samples (duplicate) were collected for analysis on Week 1 of treatment. Samples for concentration analysis were taken from the middle for Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 while samples for homogeneity analysis were taken from approximately the top, middle, and bottom for Groups 2, 3, and 4 only.
Analyses were performed using a validated analytical procedure (Test Facility Study No. 20276345).
Concentration and Homogeneity Analysis: at 21°C
For concentration: mean sample concentration results within or equal to ± 10% solutions of theoretical concentration were considered acceptable.
For homogeneity: relative standard deviation (RSD) of concentrations of ≤10% for each group was considered acceptable.
Stability Analysis:
Stability analyses was performed previously in conjunction with the method development and validation study (Test Facility Study No. 20276345). This demonstrated that the test material was stable in the vehicle when prepared and stored under the same conditions at concentrations bracketing those used in the present study. - Details on mating procedure:
- Impregnation procedure: purchased timed pregnant (females arrived on Day 0 or Day 1 post-coitum)
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Daily from day 6 to 20 post coitum
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily
- Duration of test:
- From day 0 to 21 post coitum (Caesarean section and necropsy)
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Group 1 (Control)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Group 2 (Low dose)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Group 3 ( (Intermediate dose)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Group 4 (High dose)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 22 females/dose group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale:
Dose levels were selected based on the results of a 14-day dose range finder and a combined 90-day repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction / developmental toxicity screening test with oral gavage administration of Petroleum gas oil fraction, co-processed with renewable hydrocarbons of plant and/or animal origin (EC 941-364-9) in rats (Test Facility StudyNos. 20276348 and 20276349, respectively), and in an attempt to produce graded responses to the test item. For both studies, no toxicity was observed at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day. Therefore, a maximum dose level of 1000 mg/kg/day was selected for the current study. The high-dose level should produce some toxic effects, but not excessive lethality that would prevent meaningful evaluation. The mid-dose level is expected to produce minimal to moderate toxic effects. The low-dose level should produce no observable indications of toxicity.
- Rationale for animal assignment: The animals were assigned to groups at random
- Fasting period before blood sampling for (rat) dam thyroid hormones: Not fasted
- Time of day for (rat) dam blood sampling: Sampled between 07.00 and 09.00 from the jugular vein
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Except on days of receipt and necropsy (where frequency was at least once daily), all F0 animals were observed at least twice daily (beginning upon arrival through termination) for mortality. Cage side observations were conducted 0 to 1 hours post-dose at least once daily starting on Day 6 post-coitum up to the day prior to necropsy.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Detailed clinical observtions were conducted for all animals on Days 2, 6, 15, and 21 post-coitum.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Individual body weights of all animals were recorded on Days 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 post-coitum.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes; over Days 2-6, 6-9, 9-12, 12-15, 15-18, and 18-21 post coitum.
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): Yes; Regular basis throughout the study. Water consumption was monitored by visual inspection of the water bottles. Data were used for health monitoring of the animals only and not reported.
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on day 21 post coitum
- Organs examined: Animals surviving until scheduled euthanasia were anaesthetized by a mixture of carbon dioxide and dioxide (graduate fill to a ratio of 60%/40%) and euthanized by a graduate fill of carbon dioxide on Day 21 post-coitum. The thyroid gland was weighed at necropsy for all animals. Paired organs were weighed together. Organ to body weight ratio (using the body weight on Day 21 post-coitum) was calculated. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Each ovary and uterine horn of all animals were dissected and examined as quickly as possible.
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- OTHER:
- The number and distribution of live and dead fetuses
- The sex of each fetus based on the anogenital distance - Blood sampling:
- - Plasma: No
- Serum: Yes
- Volume collected : 1.0 mL
Blood of F0-animals was collected on the day of scheduled necropsy (Day 21 post-coitum). Animals were not fasted overnight. Samples were collected between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. from the jugular vein of all F0 animals. Blood samples were processed for serum, and serum was analyzed for Triiodothyronine (T3), Thyroxine (T4), and Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH). - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Head examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Anogenital distance of all live rodent pups: Yes, the anogenital distance of each foetus was measured
Live fetuses were euthanized by administration of sodium pentobarbital into the oral cavity using a small metal feeding tube.
Litters of females surviving to scheduled necropsy were subjected to detailed external, visceral and skeletal examinations. External, visceral, and skeletal findings were recorded as developmental variations (alterations in anatomic structure that are considered to have no significant biological effect on animal health or body conformity and/or represent slight deviations from normal) or malformations (those structural anomalies that alter general body conformity, disrupt or interfere with normal body function, or may be incompatible with life).
External Examinations:
Each viable fetus was sexed, examined in detail to detect macroscopic visible abnormalities and its weight was determined. The anogenital distance (AGD) was measured for all viable fetuses and normalized to the cube root of the fetal body weight.
Visceral Examinations:
The sex of all fetuses was confirmed by internal examination and approximately one-half of the fetuses (live and dead) in each litter (all groups) were examined for visceral anomalies by dissection in the fresh (non-fixed) state. The thoracic and abdominal cavities were opened and dissected and this examination included the heart and major vessels. Fetal kidneys were examined and graded for renal papillae development .
Tissues with variations or malformations were stored in 10% formalin.
Head Examinations:
The heads were removed from this one-half of the fetuses in each litter and placed in Bouin's solution for soft-tissue examination using the Wilson sectioning technique.
Skeletal Examinations:
All fetuses were eviscerated, followed by fixation in 96% aqueous ethanol, and maceration in potassium hydroxide. Thereafter, they were processed for double staining with Alcian Blue 8GX and Alizarin Red S. Subsequently, skeletal examination was done for one-half of the fetuses (i.e. the fetuses with heads). - Statistics:
- For information on statistics, please see 'Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables'.
- Indices:
- Caesarean Section and Necropsy Data:
1) Pre-implantation loss (%, group mean): (Number of corpora lutea - Number of implantations / Number of corpora lutea) x100
2) Post-implantation loss (%, group mean): (Number of implantations - Number of live foetuses / Number of implantations) x100
Foetal Data:
1) Sex distribution (%, group mean): (Number of male (female) foetuses / Number of foetuses) x 100
2) External abnormalities/litter (%, group mean): (Number of foetuses with abnormality / Number of foetuses) x 100
3) Visceral abnormalities/litter (%, group mean): (Number of foetuses with abnormality / Number of examined foetuses) x 100
4) Skeletal abnormalities/litter (%, group mean): (Number of foetuses with abnormality / Number of examined foetuses) x 100 - Historical control data:
- Historical control data is provided below under 'Attachments' in this Robust Study Summary
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No clinical signs of toxicity were observed through the study period. Salivation was observed in 1/22, 2/22, 14/22, and 19/22 females in the control, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day dose groups, respectively. This was considered to be a physiological response (rather than a sign of systemic toxicity) and not toxicologically relevant taking into account the nature and minor severity of the effect and time of occurrence (i.e., after dosing).
Other clinical signs observed (incidental abnormal breathing sounds, fur loss, thin fur cover, and skin scabs) were considered to be of no toxicological relevance as they occurred within the range of background findings to be expected for rats of this age and strain which are housed and treated under the conditions in this study or were observed during a single day in only one female. - Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- No mortality was observed through the study period.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 100 and 300 mg/kg/day, mean body weight, body weight gain and body weight gain corrected for gravid uterus weight were observed to be comparable to the corresponding controls. Mean gravid uterus weight was considered to be comparable to the control animals for all treatment groups. Mean gravid uterus weight at 100 mg/kg/day was slightly lower than control (13%; not statistically significant). This was mainly based on two females (Nos. 24 and 39) with small litters (3 fetuses each). In the absence of a dose-related effect, this was not considered to be toxicologically relevant.
At 1000 mg/kg/day, mean body weight gain was statistically significantly reduced (p<0.01) between Days 6-9 post-coitum (mean gain 0.9 g vs 9.5 g in the control group). During this period, 7/22 females were observed to have slight body weight loss (up to 3% on Day 9 compared to Day 6 post-coitum). From Day 9 post coitum onwards body weight gain was comparable to control. Mean body weight gain corrected for gravid uterus at 1000 mg/kg/day was statistically significantly lower (p<0.05) than control (18.86 g vs 25.90 g, respectively).
As the body weight gain recovered from Day 12 post-coitum onwards to levels comparable to control, and in the absence of other signs of maternal toxicity, these findings were considered not to represent an adverse effect of the test material. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Mean food consumption at 100 and 300 mg/kg/day was considered to be comparable to the corresponding controls. At 1000 mg/kg/day, mean food consumption was statistically significantly decreased over (p<0.01) Days 6-12 post-coitum (up to 23% lower than control) but recovered to values comparable to control from Day 12 post coitum onwards. As a result of the initial decrease, overall food consumption (Days 6 21 post-coitum) was statistically significantly (p<0.05) lower (8%) than control.
As food consumption recovered from Day 12 post-coitum onwards to levels comparable to control, and in the absence of other signs of maternal toxicity, these findings were considered not to represent an adverse effect of the test material. - Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Water consumption was monitored by visual inspection of the water bottles. Data were used for health monitoring of the animals only and not reported.
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Endocrine findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Mean serum levels of T3 at 100 mg/kg/day were in the same range as the corresponding control animals. Mean serum levels of Triiodothyronine (T3) were statistically significantly reduced (p<0.01) at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day (0.75 and 0.63x of control, respectively), and were considered treatment-related. Nonetheless, at 300 mg/kg/day, the mean T3 level remained within the available historical control range. However, at 1000 mg/kg/day, the mean T3 level (and individual serum levels of 16/22 females) were below the lower limit of the available historical control range. The downstream biological consequences of thyroid hormone changes were not assessed within this type of study and therefore possible adversity of the effects on thyroid hormones could not be assessed. This finding was not taken into account when determining the maternal NOAEL.
Mean serum levels of total T4 at 100 mg/kg/day were slightly increased (1.20x of control). Mean serum levels of total Thyroxine (T4) were considered unaffected by treatment at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day and mean T4 serum levels at all dose levels remained within the available historical control range.
.
Mean serum levels of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) showed an apparent dose-related trend towards an increase across the dose groups, reaching statistical significance (p<0.01) at 1000 mg/kg/day only (2.38x of control). This effect was considered treatment-related. However, mean TSH levels for all groups remained within the available historical control range. - Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related effects were observed on thyroid gland weight/s.
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Gross necropsy did not reveal any treatment-related effects in the thyroid glands.
Other findings observed amongst the control and/or treated animals were considered to be of no toxicological significance since they remained within the range of biological variation for rats of this age and strain. - Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related microscopic observations were seen in the thyroid glands. The recorded microscopic findings in the thyroid gland were within the range of background pathology encountered in rats of this age and strain.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All females were gravid with viable fetuses, except for one female (No. 38) in the low dose group (100 mg/kg/day), which was non gravid.
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The percentage of pre-implantation loss was higher than control in females treated at 100 and 300 mg/kg/day. However, as treatment was only initiated after implantation was completed and in the absence of a dose response, this was considered a chance finding.
The percentage of post-implantation loss in the control and test groups was similar and in the range of normal biological variation. - Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- no effects observed
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The mean number of corpora lutea and implantation sites in the control and test groups were similar and in the range of normal biological variation. All females were gravid with viable fetuses, except for one female (No. 38) in the low dose group (100 mg/kg/day), which was non gravid.
- Other effects:
- not examined
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Systemic Toxicity
Maternal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Mean fetal weights (male, female and combined) in the control and test groups were considered similar and unaffected by treatment. Higher fetal weights observed at 100 mg/kg/day (males, females and combined; only statistically significant for females) were considered a chance finding as this occurred in the absence of a dose response.
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The male:female ratio was unaffected by treatment up to 1000 mg/kg/day.
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No treatment-related effects on litter size were observed in any group. The mean number of fetuses per litter was slightly lower at 100 mg/kg/day (10.0 vs 11.7 in the control group). In the absence of a dose-related effect or statistically significant difference, this was considered unrelated to treatment.
- Anogenital distance of all rodent fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Anogenital distance (absolute and normalized for body weight) in male and female pups was unaffected by treatment up to 1000 mg/kg/day.
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- no effects observed
- External malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- One fetus (No. 28 L1) in the low dose group (100 mg/kg/day) presented with an external malformation (polydactyly of a hindpaw) which was confirmed at skeletal examination. This single occurrence of a malformation in a low-dose fetus did not suggest any treatment-related effect and was therefore considered a chance finding. No external variations were observed through the study period.
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Skeletal malformations occurred in one fetus each in the low- and high-dose groups. The fetus (No. 28-L1) in the low dose group (100 mg/kg/day) presented extra hindpaw phalanges, consistent with polydactyly observed in this fetus at external examination while the fetus (No. 71-L1) in the high dose group (1000 mg/kg/day) had an extra lumbar vertebra. Due to the single occurrences of these malformations, they were deemed chance findings. All skeletal variations observed occurred in the absence of a dose-related incidence trend, infrequently and/or in control fetuses only. Therefore, they were not considered treatment-related.
- Visceral malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Visceral malformations were observed in two fetuses, one in the control group and the other in the high dose group. The fetus in the control group (Fetus No. 21-L2) had fused lung lobes while the fetus in the high dose group (1000 mg/kg/day) presented situs inversus and fused lung lobes. Given the single occurrences of these malformations and/or occurrence in the control group, they were deemed chance findings.
Visceral variations were limited to supernumerary liver lobes, absent renal papilla, and convoluted or dilated ureters. The low incidences, group distribution, and occurrence in control fetuses ruled out any relationship to treatment with the test material. - Other effects:
- not examined
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Developmental Toxicity
Fetal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
Overall developmental toxicity
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Formulation Analysis:
Concentration analysis:
The concentrations analyzed in the formulation of Groups 2, 3, and 4 were in agreement with target concentrations (i.e., mean sample concentration results were within or equal to 90-110% of target concentration) and no test material was detected in the Group 1 formulation.
Homogeneity:
The formulation of Groups 2, 3, and 4 were homogeneous (i.e., coefficient of variation ≤ 10%).
Table 2. Results of Formulation Analysis |
|||||
Date of analysis |
Concentration (mg/mL) |
Recovery (%) |
|||
Target |
Nominal |
Analyzed |
Individual |
Mean |
|
2021-SEP-27 |
25 |
22.6 |
24.3 |
108 |
104 |
24.8 |
24.8 |
100 |
|||
250 |
247 |
254 |
103 |
102 |
|
255 |
255 |
100 |
Table 3. Summary of Body Weights: Gestation (F0: Female) |
||||||||
Group |
|
Day(s) Relative to Mating (Litter: A) |
||||||
2 |
6 |
9 |
12 |
15 |
18 |
21 |
||
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
220.0 |
232.7 |
242.1 |
256.5 |
270.5 |
303.6 |
340.3 |
SD |
13.5 |
14.6 |
15.4 |
15.3 |
17.5 |
21.8 |
27.3 |
|
N |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
20 |
|
|
||||||||
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
215.4 |
228.8 |
237.7 |
251.8 |
264.9 |
293.8 |
331.3 |
SD |
11.3 |
12.0 |
12.4 |
12.3 |
13.8 |
17.3 |
22.3 |
|
N |
21 |
21 |
21 |
21 |
21 |
21 |
20 |
|
% Diff |
-2.1 |
-1.7 |
-1.8 |
-1.9 |
-2.1 |
-3.3 |
-2.6 |
|
|
||||||||
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
220.7 |
234.1 |
242.0 |
257.3 |
270.6 |
303.2 |
340.9 |
SD |
12.1 |
13.0 |
12.5 |
15.6 |
16.8 |
18.9 |
23.6 |
|
N |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
21 |
|
% Diff |
0.3 |
0.6 |
-0.1 |
0.3 |
0.0 |
-0.1 |
0.2 |
|
|
||||||||
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
218.6 |
231.8 |
232.7 |
246.5 |
261.2 |
294.2 |
326.7 |
SD |
13.2 |
14.7 |
13.8 |
15.5 |
17.8 |
20.9 |
28.8 |
|
N |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
20 |
|
% Diff |
-0.7 |
-0.4 |
-3.9 |
-3.9 |
-3.4 |
-3.1 |
-4.0 |
Anova & Dunnett
Table 4. Summary of Body Weight Gains (g): Gestation (F0: Females) |
|||||||
Group |
|
Day(s) Relative to Mating (Litter: A) |
|||||
6 → 9 [G] |
9 → 12 [G1] |
12 → 15 [G1] |
15 → 18 [G1] |
18 → 21 [G1] |
6 → 21 [G1] |
||
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
9.5 |
14.5 |
13.9 |
33.1 |
37.7 |
108.2 |
SD |
3.5 |
3.2 |
4.8 |
6.6 |
6.5 |
15.7 |
|
N |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
20 |
20 |
|
|
|||||||
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
8.9 |
14.1 |
13.1 |
28.9 |
36.1 |
101.6 |
SD |
2.4 |
4.5 |
4.2 |
6.3 |
9.2 |
19.2 |
|
N |
21 |
21 |
21 |
21 |
20 |
20 |
|
|
|||||||
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
7.9 |
15.3 |
13.3 |
32.6 |
36.3 |
106.2 |
SD |
4.4 |
5.7 |
4.7 |
5.2 |
6.9 |
14.7 |
|
N |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
21 |
21 |
|
|
|||||||
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
0.9** |
13.8 |
14.7 |
33.0 |
33.7 |
95.8 |
SD |
5.2 |
4.5 |
5.3 |
5.8 |
10.0 |
18.2 |
|
N |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
20 |
20 |
[G] - Kruskal-Wallis & Dunn: ** = p ≤ 0.01
[G1] - Anova & Dunnett
Table 5. Summary of Gravid Uterine Weights and Gravid Uterus Adjusted Body Weights: Gestation (F0: Female) |
|||||
Day(s) Relative to Mating (Litter: A) |
|
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Bodyweight on Day 6 (g) [G] |
Mean |
232.7 |
228.8 |
234.1 |
231.8 |
SD |
14.6 |
12.0 |
13.0 |
14.7 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-1.7 |
0.6 |
-0.4 |
|
|
|||||
Terminal Body Weight (g) [G] |
Mean |
340.3 |
331.3 |
340.9 |
326.7 |
SD |
27.3 |
22.3 |
23.6 |
28.8 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
21 |
20 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-2.6 |
0.2 |
-4.0 |
|
|
|||||
Gravid Uterus Weight (g) [G] |
Mean |
82.10 |
71.70 |
76.12 |
78.13 |
SD |
15.9 |
19.10 |
13.09 |
16.33 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-12.67 |
-7.29 |
-4.84 |
|
|
|||||
Adjusted BWG (6-abw) (g) [G] |
Mean |
25.90 |
29.01 |
28.80 |
18.86* |
SD |
9.15 |
8.48 |
8.25 |
10.74 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
21 |
20 |
|
% Diff |
- |
12.03 |
11.22 |
-27.19 |
[G] - Anova & Dunnett: * = p ≤ 0.05
Table 6. Summary of Food Consumption: Gestation (F0: Females) |
|||||||
Group |
|
Day(s) Relative to Mating (Litter: A) |
|||||
6 → 9 |
9 → 12 |
12 → 15 |
15 → 18 |
18 → 21 |
6 → 21 |
||
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
20.50 |
19.94 |
20.59 |
21.83 |
21.18 |
20.81 |
SD |
2.11 |
1.61 |
1.81 |
1.82 |
1.76 |
1.51 |
|
N |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
|
|
|||||||
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
21.35 |
19.83 |
20.92 |
21.97 |
21.57 |
21.13 |
SD |
2.46 |
2.73 |
2.11 |
2.37 |
2.23 |
1.89 |
|
N |
21 |
21 |
21 |
21 |
21 |
21 |
|
% Diff |
4.14 |
-0.57 |
1.60 |
0.62 |
1.84 |
1.53 |
|
|
|||||||
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
20.24 |
19.09 |
20.50 |
22.41 |
21.71 |
20.79 |
SD |
3.98 |
2.61 |
3.05 |
2.81 |
2.74 |
2.40 |
|
N |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
-1.26 |
-4.26 |
-0.44 |
2.64 |
2.50 |
-0.09 |
|
|
|||||||
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
15.88** |
16.97** |
19.03 |
22.59 |
20.95 |
19.08* |
SD |
2.94 |
2.60 |
2.33 |
1.85 |
2.88 |
1.91 |
|
N |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
-22.54 |
-14.89 |
-7.58 |
3.47 |
-1.07 |
-8.29 |
Anova & Dunnett: * = p ≤ 0.05; ** = p ≤ 0.01
Table 7. Summary of Thyroid Hormone Values (F0 Female) |
||||
Day: 21 Relative to Mating (Litter: A) |
Reporting Special Chemistry |
|||
Group |
|
T3 (ng/mL) [G] |
T4 (ng/mL) [G] |
TSH (ng/mL) [G] |
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
0.386 |
20.01 |
0.2425 |
SD |
0.051 |
3.11 |
0.1698 |
|
N |
22 |
22 |
22 |
|
|
||||
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
0.382 |
24.03** |
0.3191 |
SD |
0.079 |
4.91 |
0.1531 |
|
N |
21 |
21 |
21 |
|
tCtrl |
0.99 |
1.20 |
1.32 |
|
|
||||
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
0.291** |
21.23 |
0.3443 |
SD |
0.057 |
3.85 |
0.2992 |
|
N |
22 |
22 |
22 |
|
tCtrl |
0.75 |
1.06 |
1.42 |
|
|
||||
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Mean |
0.244** |
18.16 |
0.5770** |
SD |
0.074 |
3.63 |
0.3300 |
|
N |
22 |
22 |
22 |
|
tCtrl |
0.63 |
0.91 |
2.38 |
[G] - Anova & Dunnett: ** = p ≤ 0.01
Table 8. Summary of Organ Weights (F0: Female) |
|||||
Day(s) Relative to Mating (Litter: A) |
|
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Terminal Body Weight (g) [G] |
Mean |
340.3 |
331.3 |
340.9 |
326.7 |
SD |
27.3 |
22.3 |
23.6 |
28.8 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
21 |
20 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-2.6 |
0.2 |
-4.0 |
|
|
|||||
Gland, Thyroid Weight (g) - [G] |
Mean |
0.01362 |
0.01404 |
0.01423 |
0.01473 |
SD |
0.00268 |
0.00272 |
0.00264 |
0.00236 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
3.04908 |
4.47114 |
8.14147 |
|
|
|||||
Gland, Thyroid (%bw) - [G] |
Mean |
0.00394 |
0.00427 |
0.00421 |
0.00449 |
SD |
0.00079 |
0.00077 |
0.00071 |
0.00076 |
|
N |
20 |
20 |
21 |
20 |
[G] - Anova & Dunnett
Table 9. Summary of Macroscopic Pathology: Incidence (F0: Female) |
||||
Incidence |
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Number of Animals |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
GLAND, SALIVARY, MANDIBULAR |
|
|||
Submitted |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Focus, dark; red |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
GLAND, THYROID |
|
|||
Submitted |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
No Visible Lesions |
21 |
22 |
22 |
21 |
Focus, dark; red |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Enlargement |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Small |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
SKIN |
|
|||
Submitted |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Scab; cervical, dorsal |
1 |
0 |
- |
- |
Thin hair coat |
1 |
0 |
- |
- |
Thin hair coat; forelimb,left |
0 |
1 |
- |
- |
Table 10. Summary of Microscopic Pathology: Incidence (F0: Female) |
||||
Incidence |
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Number of Animals |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
GLAND, THYROID |
|
|||
Examined |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
No Visible Lesions |
22 |
21 |
21 |
19 |
Hypertrophy; follicular cell |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
.... minimal |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
Ectopia; thymic corpuscle |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Table 11. Summary of Maternal Performance and Mortality (F0: Female) |
|||||
Day(s) Relative to Mating (Litter: A) |
|
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Group Size - Females |
|
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
Number of Females Pregnant [f] |
N+ve |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
% |
100.0 |
95.5 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
|||||
Female with Live Fetuses [f] |
N+ve |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
% |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
|||||
Total Resorptions [f] |
N+ve |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|||||
Female with all Nonviable [f] |
N+ve |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|||||
Terminal Euthanasia [f] |
N+ve |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
% |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
|||||
Unscheduled Death/Euthanasia [f] |
N+ve |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
% |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
[f] - Fisher's Exact
Table 12. Summary of Ovarian and Uterine Examinations and Litter Observations (F0: Female) |
|||||
Day(s) Relative to Mating (Litter: A) |
|
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Female with Live Fetuses |
N+ve |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
% |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
|||||
Number of Corpora Lutea [k] |
Mean |
13.6 |
12.7 |
13.6 |
13.0 |
SD |
1.5 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
2.4 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-6.8 |
0.0 |
-4.7 |
|
|
|||||
Number of Implantations [k] |
Mean |
12.6 |
10.8 |
11.8 |
12.0 |
SD |
1.5 |
3.0 |
1.8 |
2.9 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-14.5 |
-6.1 |
-4.3 |
|
|
|||||
Pre-implantation Loss (%) [k] |
Mean |
7.50 |
15.97 |
12.84 |
7.69 |
SD |
7.52 |
21.14 |
13.52 |
12.32 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
112.98 |
71.19 |
2.48 |
|
|
|||||
Total Number of Fetuses [k] |
Mean |
11.7 |
10.0 |
11.2 |
11.6 |
SD |
2.2 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
2.8 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-14.3 |
-4.7 |
-0.8 |
|
|
|||||
Number of Live Fetuses [k] |
Mean |
11.7 |
10.0 |
11.2 |
11.6 |
SD |
2.2 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
2.8 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-14.3 |
-4.7 |
-0.8 |
|
|
|||||
Number of Dead Fetuses [k] |
Mean |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
SD |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|||||
Number of Early Resorptions [k] |
Mean |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
SD |
1.2 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-17.3 |
-26.3 |
-52.6 |
|
|
|||||
Number of Late Resorptions [k] |
Mean |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
SD |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
|||||
Total Number of Resorptions [k] |
Mean |
0.9 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
SD |
1.2 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-17.3 |
-26.3 |
-52.6 |
|
|
|||||
Post-implantation Loss (%) [k] |
Mean |
7.40 |
6.89 |
5.61 |
3.52 |
SD |
11.16 |
11.13 |
7.66 |
5.52 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-7.00 |
-24.27 |
-52.44 |
|
|
|||||
Number of Live Male Fetuses [k] |
Mean |
6.0 |
5.2 |
4.9 |
5.3 |
SD |
2.3 |
2.1 |
2.4 |
1.7 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-12.0 |
-17.6 |
-11.5 |
|
|
|||||
Number of Live Female Fetuses [k] |
Mean |
5.8 |
4.8 |
6.3 |
6.4 |
SD |
2.1 |
2.5 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-16.7 |
8.7 |
10.2 |
|
|
|||||
Live Male Fetus/Litter (%) [k] |
Mean |
50.37 |
53.71 |
43.02 |
45.30 |
SD |
15.55 |
16.94 |
19.10 |
11.51 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
6.64 |
-14.58 |
-10.06 |
|
|
|||||
Live Female Fetuses/Litter (%) [k] |
Mean |
49.63 |
46.29 |
56.98 |
54.70 |
SD |
15.55 |
16.94 |
19.10 |
11.51 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-6.73 |
14.79 |
10.21 |
|
|
|||||
Mean Fetal Weight males (g) [G] |
Mean |
5.328 |
5.434 |
5.253 |
5.211 |
SD |
0.181 |
0.261 |
0.296 |
0.246 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
21 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
1.985 |
-1.398 |
-2.195 |
|
|
|||||
Mean Fetal Weight females (g) [G] |
Mean |
5.052 |
5.212* |
5.004 |
4.973 |
SD |
0.217 |
0.265 |
0.206 |
0.157 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
3.172 |
-0.941 |
-1.558 |
|
|
|||||
Mean Fetal Weight all (g) [G] |
Mean |
5.193 |
5.333 |
5.105 |
5.086 |
SD |
0.176 |
0.242 |
0.216 |
0.192 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
2.696 |
-1.696 |
-2.072 |
|
|
|||||
Mean Fetal AGD males (mm) [G1] |
Mean |
2.92 |
2.93 |
2.79 |
2.74 |
SD |
0.27 |
0.23 |
0.25 |
0.32 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
21 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
0.25 |
-4.51 |
-6.24 |
|
|
|||||
Mean Fetal AGD females (mm) [G1] |
Mean |
1.39 |
1.33 |
1.32 |
1.39 |
SD |
0.29 |
0.32 |
0.26 |
0.34 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-3.90 |
-5.19 |
-0.10 |
|
|
|||||
Mean Normalized Fetal AGD m [G] |
Mean |
1.672 |
1.667 |
1.604 |
1.579 |
SD |
0.146 |
0.137 |
0.130 |
0.176 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
21 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-0.301 |
-4.042 |
-5.573 |
|
|
|||||
Mean Normalized Fetal AGD f [G]
|
Mean |
0.810 |
0.771 |
0.770 |
0.813 |
SD |
0.168 |
0.186 |
0.152 |
0.202 |
|
N |
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
% Diff |
- |
-4.850 |
-4.938 |
0.423 |
[G] - Anova & Dunnett: * = p ≤ 0.05
[G1] - Anova & Dunnett
[k] - Kruskal-Wallis & Dunn
Table 13. Summary of Fetal Abnormalities by Finding (F1: External) |
|||||
|
|
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Number of Fetuses Examined: |
|
258 |
211 |
246 |
256 |
Number of Fetuses Evaluated: |
|
258 |
211 |
246 |
256 |
Number of Litters Examined: |
|
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
Number of Litters Evaluated: |
|
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
|||||
Paw/Digit |
|
||||
Hindpaw, Left, Polydactyly - Malformation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (0.37) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
Table 14. Summary of Fetal Abnormalities by Finding (F1: FreshVisBody) |
|||||
|
|
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Number of Fetuses Examined: |
|
127 |
104 |
121 |
127 |
Number of Fetuses Evaluated: |
|
258 |
211 |
246 |
256 |
Number of Litters Examined: |
|
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
Number of Litters Evaluated: |
|
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
|||||
General |
|
||||
General, Situs inversus - Malformation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (0.65) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.5) |
|
Kidney |
|
||||
Renal papilla, Right, Absent - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (0.68) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Liver |
|
||||
Lobe, Left medial, Supernumerary - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
3 (2.06) |
1 (0.79) |
1 (0.76) |
2 (1.41) |
Litters N(%) |
3 (13.6) |
1 (4.8) |
1 (4.5) |
2 (9.1) |
|
Lobe, Right medial, Supernumerary - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
2 (1.90) |
2 (1.41) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.8) |
2 (9.1) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Lung |
|
||||
Lobe, Left cranial, Fused - Malformation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (0.65) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.5) |
|
Lobe, Right medial, Fused - Malformation |
Fetuses N(%) |
1 (0.65) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
1 (4.5) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Ureter |
|
||||
Ureter, Left, Convoluted - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
1 (0.76) |
1 (0.79) |
1 (0.76) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
1 (4.5) |
1 (4.8) |
1 (4.5) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Ureter, Right, Convoluted - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
1 (0.65) |
2 (1.63) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
1 (4.5) |
2 (9.5) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Ureter, Right, Dilatation, Minimal - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (0.68) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
[Fetuses %] - Kruskal-Wallis & Dunn
FetusesN(%) N=Group Fetal Incidence;(%)=Mean Litter % of Fetuses with the Abnormality
Table 15. Summary of Fetal Abnormalities by Finding (F1: Skeletal) |
|||||
|
|
Group 1 Control 0 mg/kg/day |
Group 2 100 mg/kg/day |
Group 3 300 mg/kg/day |
Group 4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Number of Fetuses Examined: |
|
131 |
107 |
125 |
129 |
Number of Fetuses Evaluated: |
|
258 |
211 |
246 |
256 |
Number of Litters Examined: |
|
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
Number of Litters Evaluated: |
|
22 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
|
|||||
Forelimb |
|
||||
Forepaw phalanges, 1 or more, Unossified - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (0.65) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.5) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Hindlimb |
|
||||
Hindpaw phalanges, 1 or more, Supernumerary - Malformation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (0.68) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Metatarsal, 1 or more, Malpositioned - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (0.79) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Pelvic Girdle |
|
||||
Ilium, Both, Misaligned - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
10 (7.03) |
4 (4.05) |
3 (1.95) |
11 (9.22) |
Litters N(%) |
6 (27.3) |
4 (19.0) |
2 (9.1) |
9 (40.9) |
|
Rib |
|
||||
Costal cartilage, 1 or more, Fused - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
2 (1.41) |
1 (0.79) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
2 (9.1) |
1 (4.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Rib, 1 or more, Wavy rib - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
12 (8.87) |
10 (8.95) |
2 (1.41) |
3 (2.32) |
Litters N(%) |
7 (31.8) |
6 (28.6) |
2 (9.1) |
2 (13.6) |
|
Skull |
|
||||
Frontal, Left, Incomplete ossification - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (1.19) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Interparietal, Incomplete ossification - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
3 (2.16) |
5 (4.97) |
1 (0.76) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
3 (13.6) |
4 (19.0) |
1 (4.5) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Parietal, Both, Incomplete ossification - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
2 (1.52) |
1 (1.19) |
1 (0.76) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
2 (9.1) |
1 (4.8) |
1 (4.5) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Parietal, Right, Incomplete ossification - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (1.19) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Squamosal, Both, Incomplete ossification - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
1 (0.76) |
1 (1.19) |
2 (1.52) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
1 (4.5) |
1 (4.8) |
1 (4.5) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Supraoccipital, Incomplete ossification - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
1 (0.76) |
1 (0.95) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
1 (4.5) |
1 (4.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Zygomatic arch, Both, Incomplete ossification - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
1 (0.76) |
0 (0.00) |
3 (2.27) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
1 (4.5) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.5) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Zygomatic arch, Left, Incomplete ossification - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (1.19) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Zygomatic arch, Right, Incomplete ossification - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
2 (2.38) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Sternebra |
|
||||
Sternebra, 1 or more, Branched - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
1 (0.76) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (0.65) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
1 (4.5) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.5) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Sternebra, 1 or more, Misaligned - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
3 (2.32) |
1 (4.76) |
2 (1.56) |
1 (0.76) |
Litters N(%) |
3 (13.6) |
1 (4.8) |
2 (9.1) |
1 (4.5) |
|
Sternebra, 1 or more, Unossified - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (4.76) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Sternebra, 1 or more, Incomplete ossification - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (4.76) |
2 (1.41) |
2 (1.41) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.8) |
2 (9.1) |
2 (9.1) |
|
Supernumerary rib |
|
||||
Cervical, 1 or more, Full - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
2 (1.41) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
2 (9.1) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Cervical, 1 or more, Short - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
5 (4.39) |
4 (7.30) |
5 (4.13) |
6 (4.11) |
Litters N(%) |
4 (18.2) |
3 (14.3) |
5 (22.7) |
5 (22.7) |
|
Thoracolumbar, 1 or more, Full - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
15 (10.46) |
5 (4.29) |
9 (7.49) |
17 (11.96) |
Litters N(%) |
10 (45.5) |
3 (14.3) |
6 (27.3) |
9 (40.9) |
|
Thoracolumbar, 1 or more, Short - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
83 (64.09) |
53 (49.56) |
81 (63.82) |
80 (63.40) |
Litters N(%) |
20 (90.9) |
20 (95.2) |
22 (100.0) |
21 (95.5) |
|
Vertebra |
|
||||
Cervical arch, 1 or more, Small - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (0.91) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.5) |
0 (0.0) |
|
Lumbar vertebra, 1 or more, Supernumerary - Malformation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (0.76) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.5) |
|
Thoracic centrum, 1 or more, Incomplete ossification - Variation |
Fetuses N(%) |
0 (0.00) |
0 (0.00) |
1 (0.91) |
0 (0.00) |
Litters N(%) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
1 (4.5) |
0 (0.0) |
[Fetuses %] - Kruskal-Wallis & Dunn
FetusesN(%) N=Group Fetal Incidence;(%)=Mean Litter % of Fetuses with the Abnormality
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Based on the effects observed, the maternal and developmental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for Petroleum Gas Oil Fraction, Co-Processed with Renewable Hydrocarbons of Plant and/or Animal Origin (EC 941-364-9) was determined to be ≥1000 mg/kg/day in the rat.
- Executive summary:
A key OECD Guideline 414 pre-natal developmental toxicity study was conducted to evaluate the potential of the test material (Petroleum Gas Oil Fraction, Co Processed with Renewable Hydrocarbons of Plant and/or Animal Origin (EC 941-364-9)) to induce developmental toxicity after maternal exposure during the critical period of organogenesis and to characterize maternal toxicity at the exposure levels tested.
The test material was administered to time-mated female Wistar Han rats (22/dose) once daily via oral gavage in a corn oil vehicle at doses of 0, 100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg/day from Days 6 to 20 post-coitum, inclusive. The parameters evaluated for the maternal animals (F0 generation) included mortality / moribundity, clinical signs, body weights, food consumption, thyroid hormone levels (triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxine (T4), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)), macroscopic examination, organ weights (thyroid gland), uterine contents, microscopic examination (thyroid gland), corpora lutea, implantation sites and pre- and post-implantation loss. Additionally, the number of live and dead fetuses, fetal body weights, sex ratio, anogenital distance, external, visceral and skeletal malformations and developmental variations were evaluated for the pups (F1 generation).
No mortality or clinical signs of toxicity were observed through the study period. At 1000 mg/kg/day, mean food consumption was decreased over Days 6-12 post-coitum and mean body weight gain was reduced between Day 6-9 post-coitum. As a result, body weight gain corrected for gravid uterus weight was also slightly reduced. Food consumption and body weight gain recovered from Day 12 post-coitum onwards to levels comparable to control and in the absence of other signs of maternal toxicity, these findings were not considered to represent an adverse treatment-related effect.
Mean serum levels of T3 at 100 mg/kg/day were in the same range as the corresponding control animals. Mean serum levels of Triiodothyronine (T3) were statistically significantly reduced (p<0.01) at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day (0.75 and 0.63x of control, respectively), and were considered treatment-related. Nonetheless, at 300 mg/kg/day, the mean T3 level remained within the available historical control range. However, at 1000 mg/kg/day, the mean T3 level (and individual serum levels of 16/22 females) were below the lower limit of the available historical control range. The downstream biological consequences of thyroid hormone changes are not assessed in this type of study and therefore possible adversity of the effects on thyroid hormones could not be assessed and this finding was not taken into account when determining the maternal NOAEL.
Mean serum levels of total T4 at 100 mg/kg/day were slightly increased (1.20x of control). Mean serum levels of total Thyroxine (T4) were considered unaffected by treatment at 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day and mean T4 serum levels at all dose levels remained within the available historical control range.
Mean serum levels of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) showed an apparent dose-related trend towards an increase across the dose groups, reaching statistical significance (p<0.01) at 1000 mg/kg/day only (2.38x of control). This effect was considered treatment-related. However, mean TSH levels for all groups remained within the available historical control range. No treatment-related effects were observed on thyroid gland weight/s and gross necropsy as well as histopathology did not reveal any treatment-related effects in the thyroid glands.
All females were gravid with viable fetuses, except for one female (No. 38) in the low dose group (100 mg/kg/day), which was non gravid. The percentage of pre-implantation loss was higher than control in females treated at 100 and 300 mg/kg/day. However, as treatment was only initiated after implantation was completed and in the absence of a dose response, this was considered a chance finding. The percentage of post-implantation loss in the control and test groups was similar and in the range of normal biological variation. The mean number of corpora lutea and implantation sites in the control and test groups were similar and in the range of normal biological variation.
Mean fetal weights (male, female and combined) in the control and test groups were considered similar and unaffected by treatment. The sex ratio was also unaffected by treatment up to 1000 mg/kg/day and no treatment-related effects on litter size were observed in any group. Anogenital distance (absolute and normalized for body weight) in male and female pups was unaffected by treatment up to 1000 mg/kg/day.
One fetus (No. 28 L1) in the low dose group (100 mg/kg/day) presented with an external malformation (polydactyly of a hindpaw) which was confirmed at skeletal examination. This single occurrence of a malformation in a low-dose fetus did not suggest a treatment-related effect and was therefore considered a chance finding. No external variations were observed through the study period.
Visceral malformations were observed in two fetuses, one in the control group and the other in the high dose group. The fetus in the control group (Fetus No. 21-L2) had fused lung lobes while the fetus in the high dose group (1000 mg/kg/day) presented situs inversus and fused lung lobes. Given the single occurrences of these malformations and/or occurrence in the control group, they were deemed chance findings.
Visceral variations were limited to supernumerary liver lobes, absent renal papilla, and convoluted or dilated ureters. The low incidences, group distribution, and occurrence in control fetuses ruled out any relationship to treatment with the test material.
Skeletal malformations occurred in one fetus each in the low- and high-dose groups. The fetus (No. 28-L1) in the low dose group (100 mg/kg/day) presented extra hindpaw phalanges, consistent with polydactyly observed in this fetus at external examination while the fetus (No. 71-L1) in the high dose group (1000 mg/kg/day) had an extra lumbar vertebra. Due to the single occurrences of these malformations, they were deemed chance findings. All skeletal variations observed occurred in the absence of a dose-related incidence trend, infrequently and/or in control fetuses only. Therefore, they were not considered treatment-related.
Based on the effects observed, the maternal and developmental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for Petroleum Gas Oil Fraction, Co-Processed with Renewable Hydrocarbons of Plant and/or Animal Origin (EC 941-364-9) was determined to be≥1000 mg/kg/day in the rat.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.