Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-142-8 | CAS number: 78-78-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
The estimated freshwater invertebrate 48 hour EL50 value is 59.44mg/l based on mobility. This is supported by a measured value: 48hr EC50 for Daphnia magna of 2.3mg/l
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 2.3 mg/L
Additional information
The aquatic toxicity was also estimated using the Petrotox computer model, which combines a partitioning model used to calculate the aqueous concentration of hydrocarbon components as a function of substance loading with the Target Lipid Model used to calculate acute and chronic toxicity of non-polar narcotic chemicals. Petrotox computes toxicity based on the summation of the aqueous-phase concentrations of hydrocarbon block(s) that represent a hydrocarbon substance and membrane-water partitioning coefficients (KMW) that describe the partitioning of the hydrocarbons between the water and organism. The estimated freshwater invertebrate 48 hour EL50 value is 59.44mg/l based on mobility.
The study for 2-methylbutane (Adema and Bakker 1986) is equivalent to OECD 202, using a static, closed system with low headspace, a standard test species (Daphnia magna) and the standard exposure duration (48hrs). Two marine crustaceans were also used in the study, Chaetogammarus marinus and Mysidopsis bahia. The tests with marine crustaceans were carried out with only one animal per container (10 individuals per concentration). LC50values for both species were based on the initial measured concentration. C marinus LC 50 (96 hours) = 3.2 mg/l (initial measured concentration) and M bahia = 3.2 mg/l (initial measured concentration). The most sensitive result was reported for Daphnia magna. The Daphnia magna EC50(48 hours) for 2 -methylbutane = 2.3 mg/l (based on initial measured concentration).
The true EC50 value maybe higher since loss of the starting material was determinedto be about 50% during the 48hr exposure period.This point is highlighted in the report itself butthe version of the study reviewed lacked the annex containing key details on the test conditions and therefore these could not be reviewed and generally validated against OECD criteria.However the study was selected as key study in the EU Risk assessment report for n-pentane and can be considered acceptable for assessment. Reanalysis of the original data is reported in the EU RAR. They state that reanalysis of the data using mean exposure concentration would probably give somewhat lower values by a factor of 0.88 -0.51. The Adema report does not allow exact recalculation but based on the available information the EC50/LC50would be 2.4, 1.4 and 1.8mg/l for D. magna, C.marinus and M.bahia respectively.
This is supported by a QSAR calculation, with the 48 hr LC50 estimated to be 8.06 mg/l. The ECOSAR model is a reliable and appropriate QSAR model to apply to cyclopentane as it is based on a related chemical dataset that calculates the toxicity of neutral organic hydrocarbons whose mode of action is non-polar narcosis. The endpoint calculated here is therefore a reasonable estimate of its baseline toxicity.
This result would not indicate that 2 -methylbutane would meet the criteria for toxic in the PBT assessment. However, the 48 hour EC50 of 2.3 mg/l would result in a classification of acute category 2 with the hazard phrase 'toxic to aquatic life'.
The hydrocarbon block method has been used for environmental risk assessment (see REACH guidance, R7, app.13-1). Aquatic PNECs for hydrocarbon blocks have been derived using the HC5 statistical extrapolation method and the target lipid model using representative structures. See Product Library tab in PETRORISK spreadsheet attached to IUCLID Section 13. Given the large database of freshwater organisms included in the target lipid model, an assessment factor of one has been applied to the HC5.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

Route: .live2