Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Study performed in accordance with OECD guideline and in compliance with GLP guidelines. As the study is performed with a substance analogue, in accordance with REACH guidance the maximum reliability for read-across data is 2. Read-across is justified because of the similar chemical nature of the target substance compared to the analogues. The read-across rationale can be found in the analogue approach document attached in Section 13.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1996

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EEC-Directive 92/69 B.6 Maximization method
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
423-570-6
EC Name:
-
IUPAC Name:
423-570-6

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Himalayan
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction:
Intradermal injection: 5% in distilled water

Epidermal application: 50% in distilled water

Concentration of test material and vehicle used for each challenge:
50% in distilled water
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction:
Intradermal injection: 5% in distilled water

Epidermal application: 50% in distilled water

Concentration of test material and vehicle used for each challenge:
50% in distilled water
No. of animals per dose:
Number of animals in test group: 10
Number of animals in negative control group: 5

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
50 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 50 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Maximum concentration not causing irritating effects in preliminary test: 50 %

Signs of irritation during induction:

After intradermal injection:

On day 3 moderate/severe erythema (grade 1 or 2) was observed in all animals (experimental). On day 10 1/10
animals showed small scabs.

Evidence of sensitisation of each challenge concentration:
The results lead to a sensitization rate of 0%.

Other observations:
none

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information