Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-358-5 | CAS number: 94-71-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 16 july 2003 to 22 dec 2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study, OECD TG 471 compliant.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 003
- Report date:
- 2003
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-ethoxyphenol
- EC Number:
- 202-358-5
- EC Name:
- 2-ethoxyphenol
- Cas Number:
- 94-71-3
- Molecular formula:
- C8H10O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-ethoxyphenol
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 fraction was purchased from Moltox (Molecular Toxicology, INC, Boone, NC 28607, USA) and obtained from the liver of rats treated with Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg) by the intraperitoneal route.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Doses were 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000 μg/plate, for the TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 strains with and without S9 mix in the first experiment as well as for all the tester strains with and without S9 mix in the second experiment,
Doses were 156.3, 312.5, 625, 1250 and 2500 μg/plate, for the TA 102 strain in the first experiment with and without S9 mix. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: generally used in genotoxicity tests.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- vehicle (DMSO)
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: see details on test system
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- POSITIVE CONTROLS:
Without S9 mix
. sodium azide (NAN3) 1 µg/plate for TA 1535 – TA 100
. 9-Aminoacridine (9AA) 50 µg/plate for TA 1537
. 2-Nitrofluorene (2NF) 0.5 µg/plate for TA 98
. Mitomycin C (MMC) 0.5 µg/plate for TA 102
With S9 mix
. 2-Anthramine (2AM) 2 µg/plate for TA 1535 – TA 1537 – TA 98 – TA 100
. 2-Anthramine (2AM) 10 µg/plate for TA 102
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation) for both experiments, and preincubation for the second test with S9 mix.
DURATION
- Preincubation period: The preincubation method was performed as follows: test item solution (0.1 mL), S9 mix (0.5 mL) and the bacterial suspension (0.1 mL) were incubated for 60 minutes at 37°C, under shaking, before adding the overlay agar and pouring onto the surface of a minimum agar plate.
- Exposure duration: 48 to 72 hours
The plate incorporation method was performed as follow: test item solution (0.1 mL), S9 mix when required or phophate buffer pH 7.4 (0.5 mL) and bacterial suspension (0.1 mL) were mixed with 2 mL of overlay agar and maintained at 45°C. After rapid homogenization, the mixture was overlaid onto a Petri plate containing minimum medium.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES: 3 - Evaluation criteria:
- - in TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102: a test article is considered as positive if it produce at least a 2-fold increase in the mean revertant per plate of at least one of
these tester strains over the mean revertants per plate of the appropriate vehicle control. This increase in the number of revertant must be
accompanied by a dose response with increasing concentrations of the test article
- in TA 1535 and TA 1537: idem, but a 3-fold increase is required
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Tables of results: mean of number of revertants per strain
Conc. (µg/plate) |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA102 |
|||
+ S9 |
-S9 |
+ S9 |
-S9 |
+ S9 |
-S9 |
|
0* |
35 |
32 |
95 |
105 |
614 |
424 |
312.5 |
39 |
20 |
142 |
133 |
588 |
312 |
625 |
30 |
38 |
107 |
127 |
652 |
357 |
1250 |
23 |
31 |
75 |
167 |
654 |
288 |
2500 |
26 |
25 |
96 |
142 |
535 |
276 |
5000 |
16 |
24 |
30 |
77 |
68 |
121 |
Positive control |
1411 |
189 |
968 |
551 |
2165 |
1808 |
Conc. (µg/plate) |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
||
+ S9 |
-S9 |
+ S9 |
-S9 |
|
0* |
16 |
13 |
9 |
5 |
312.5 |
13 |
17 |
18 |
4 |
625 |
11 |
12 |
9 |
9 |
1250 |
16 |
16 |
7 |
8 |
2500 |
9 |
16 |
8 |
9 |
5000 |
3 |
11 |
0 |
3 |
Positive control |
157 |
486 |
92 |
474 |
*DMSO
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
Negative with and without metabolic activation.
Slightly cytotoxic at 5000 µg/plate.- Executive summary:
In a study (CIT, 2003), the potential of the test item GUETOL to induce reverse mutation in Salmonella typhimurium was evaluated according to the international guidelines (OECD 471, Commission Directive No. B13/14) and in compliance with the Principles of Good Laboratory Practice Regulations.
A preliminary toxicity test was performed to define the dose-levels of GUETOL to be used for the mutagenicity study. The test item was then tested in two independent experiments, with and without a metabolic activation system, the S9 mix, prepared from a liver microsomal fraction (S9 fraction) of rats induced with Aroclor 1254.
Both experiments were performed according to the direct plate incorporation method except for the second test with S9 mix, which was performed according to the preincubation method (60 minutes,37°C).
Five strains of bacteria Salmonella typhimurium: TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 were used. Each strain was exposed to five dose-levels of the test item (three plates/dose-level). After 48 to 72 hours of incubation at 37°C, the revertant colonies were scored.
The evaluation of the toxicity was performed on the basis of the observation of the decrease in the number of revertant colonies and/or a thinning of the bacterial lawn.
The test item GUETOL was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).
Since the test item was toxic in the preliminary test, the choice of the highest dose-level was based on the level of toxicity, according to the criteria specified in the international guidelines.
The selected treatment-levels were:
⋅312.5, 625, 1250, 2500 and 5000μg/plate, for the TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 strains with and without S9 mix in the first experiment as well as for all the tester strains with and without S9 mix in the second experiment,
⋅156.3, 312.5, 625, 1250 and 2500μg/plate, for the TA 102 strain in the first experiment with and without S9 mix.
No precipitate was observed in the Petri plates when scoring the revertants at all dose-levels.
A moderate to marked toxicity was noted with S9 mix in the preincubation method, in all the tester strains at 5000μg/plate as well as in the TA 102 strain without S9 mix at 5000μg/plate.
The test item did not induce any noteworthy increase in the number of revertants, both with and without S9 mix, in any of the five strains.
Under these experimental conditions, the test item GUETOL did not show mutagenic activity in the bacterial reverse mutation test with Salmonella typhimurium.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
