Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Adsorption / desorption

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
adsorption / desorption, other
Remarks:
adsorption
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1983
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1983

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Batch adsorption test
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: Adsorption was measured using a liquid scintillation counter
Media:
sediment

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
14C-DODMAC
IUPAC Name:
14C-DODMAC
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dimethyldioctadecylammonium chloride
EC Number:
203-508-2
EC Name:
Dimethyldioctadecylammonium chloride
Cas Number:
107-64-2
Molecular formula:
C38H80N.Cl
IUPAC Name:
N,N-dimethyl-N-octadecyloctadecan-1-aminium chloride
Test material form:
solid
Details on test material:
A commercially available mixture of unlabelled DODMAC had an average alkyl chainlength of ~C17.7. Chemical purity was > 95 %, as determined by TLC and HPLC. All other chemicals used in testing were reagent grade, obtained from commercial sources.
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
Not relevant
Radiolabelling:
yes

Study design

Test temperature:
No details given

HPLC method

Details on study design: HPLC method:
Not relevant

Batch equilibrium or other method

Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
No details supplied
Details on matrix:
Collected from two rivers (Rapid creek, Rapid City, SD; Ohio River, Cincinnati, OH) at locations 0.5 to 1.0 mile below the discharge of municipal wastewater treatment treatment plants. The sites varied significantly in terms of hydrological/geological characteristics. Rapid creek is a slow-flowing mountain stream (mean discharge ~ 50 ft3/s) with a low wastewater dilution factor (~1:5-1:10), whereas the Ohio River is a rapidly flowing major river (mean discharge ~2000,000 ft3) with high wastewater dilution factor (>1:10,000). Sediment samples were analysed for cation exchange capacity (CEC), pH, particle distribution, organic carbon, and suspended solids levels by standard procedures. They were tested on a dry weight basis. Compartive data for the two river sediments and a standard EPA sediment (EPA 18) are given in Table 1.
Details on test conditions:
Mixtures of test chemical and sediment were placed into 220 ml beakers containing 150-200 ml of 0.01 M KCl buffer. the beakers were agitated on a rotary platform shaker at room temperature to maintain uniform solids suspensions and at various intervals aliquots were removed and centrifuged at 39,000 xg for 30 min to remove particulate matter. The amount of radioactivity in solution, or on the solids after combustion, was then quantitated b
Computational methods:
Csolids

C solids
K2 = ____________
C solution

where: Csolids = ug/g on the solids

Csolution = ug/ml in solution

Equation (1) is a modified form of the Freundlich isotherm

Csolids = KdCsolution l/n

which is generally used to model adsorption processes. the Kd value can be derived from equation 2 when n=1 and can be extrapolated to different sediments by normalising for the organic carbon content of the sediment.

Results and discussion

Partition coefficientsopen allclose all
Phase system:
other: Kd (sediment-water)
Type:
other: Kd (sediment-water)
Value:
12 489 L/kg
Remarks on result:
other: EPA 18 sediment
Phase system:
other: Kd (sediment-water)
Type:
other: Kd (sediment-water)
Value:
3 833
Remarks on result:
other: Ohio river sediment
Phase system:
other: Kd (sediment-water)
Type:
other: Kd (sediment-water)
Value:
10 775
Remarks on result:
other: Rapid creek sediment

Results: HPLC method

Details on results (HPLC method):
Not relevant

Results: Batch equilibrium or other method

Adsorption and desorption constants:
No details given
Recovery of test material:
No details given
Concentration of test substance at end of adsorption equilibration period:
No details given
Concentration of test substance at end of desorption equilibration period:
No details given
Transformation products:
not specified
Statistics:
No details given

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
See Excutive summary below
Executive summary:

The sorption of DODMAC was investigated with 3 different sediments resulting in the Kd values of 3833, 10775 and 12489 L/kg.. For the EU Risk Assessment a Kd sediment of 10000 L/kg was assumed for the sediment/water partitioning of DODMAC. When assuming a suspended matter concentration of 15 mg/L in an STP effluent a Kd susp. matter of 16800 L/kg can be calculated from these data. As no measured data for the adsorption to soil is available the Kd sediment was used for Kd soil as well in the EU Risk Assessment (Kd soil 10000 L/kg).