Rape oil, sulfated, sodium salt

Skin sensitisation

Administrative data

Endpoint:

skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

2012

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

guideline study

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

2012

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Test guideline 1

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)

Test guideline 2

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)

Test guideline 3

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)

GLP compliance:

yes

Type of study:

guinea pig maximisation test

Justification for non-LLNA method:

Data from LLNA: BrdU-ELISA suggests weakly "positive" outcomes in the absence of QSAR flags for protein binding (OECD Toolbox) implying a false positive response. Confirmatory assay undertaken using the GPMT.

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

Rape oil, sulfated, sodium salt

EC Number:

281-978-8

EC Name:

Rape oil, sulfated, sodium salt

Cas Number:

84082-30-4

Molecular formula:

not available (substance is a UVCB)

IUPAC Name:

Rape oil, sulfated, sodium salt

Details on test material:

- Name of test material : CS03
- Physical state: Liquid
- Lot/batch No.: 0008
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2015-08-01
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:

guinea pig

Strain:

Dunkin-Hartley

Sex:

female

Details on test animals and environmental conditions:

TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River France
- Age at study initiation: 7 to 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 382-487 g
- Housing: Up to 5 animals/cage noryl cages measuring 74.3 x 54.3 x 25 cm
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): 8GP17 (Mucedola Srl) diet available ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water available ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 15
- Air changes (per hr): 15 - 20
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2012-08-27 To: 2012-10-06

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction

Induction 1

Route:

intradermal and epicutaneous

Vehicle:

corn oil

Induction 2

Concentration / amount:

- Concentrations used for induction: intradermal treatment: 0.5% in water; dermal treatment: 5 % in water
- Concentration in Freunds Complete Adjuvant (FCA): 0.5% test substance in a mixture of FCA and water (1:1)
- Concentrations used for challenge: 1 %

Challenge

Challenge 1

Route:

epicutaneous, occlusive

Vehicle:

corn oil

Challenge 2

Concentration / amount:

- Concentrations used for induction: intradermal treatment: 0.5% in water; dermal treatment: 5 % in water
- Concentration in Freunds Complete Adjuvant (FCA): 0.5% test substance in a mixture of FCA and water (1:1)
- Concentrations used for challenge: 1 %

No. of animals per dose:

test group: 20 animals
control group: 10 animals

Details on study design:

RANGE FINDING TESTS:
A dose range finding was performed in a preliminary study. 0.1 ml of test substance in water at various concentrations were injected intracutaneously into the skin of the scapula region. 24 hours and 7 days after application skin reaction was assessed.
For dermal applications various concentrations of the substance in water were applied on patches of 2x2 cm to the clipped skin. The patches were removed after 24 hours and dermal reactions were read immediately, 24 and 48 hours after patch removal.


MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2
- Exposure period: 1st exposure: intracutaneous injections (0.1 cm³); 2nd exposure: epicutaneous for 48 hours; evaluation after 24 hours each
- Concentration in Freunds Complete Adjuvants (FCA): test substance in vehicle at 0.5% concentration and in a mixture of FCA and vehicle (1:1)
- Test group: dermal: 5 % test substance in water (2 x 4 cm patch)
- Control group: vehicle (2 x 4 cm patch)
- Frequency of applications: day 1: intradermal treatment, day 8: dermal treatment
- Duration: 3 weeks


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: on day 22
- Exposure period: dermal application for 24 hours
- Test groups: test substance (2 x 2 cm patch)
- Control group: test substance (2 x 2 cm patch)
- Site: left flanks
- Concentrations: 1 %
- Evaluation: 24 and 48 hours after removal of dressings

Challenge controls:

see above B. Challenge exposure

Positive control substance(s):

not specified

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Results

Results 1

Reading:

1st reading

Hours after challenge:

24

Group:

negative control

Dose level:

1 %

No. with + reactions:

0

Total no. in group:

9

Remarks on result:

other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 1 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 9.0.

Results 2

Reading:

1st reading

Hours after challenge:

24

Group:

test chemical

Dose level:

1 %

No. with + reactions:

0

Total no. in group:

20

Remarks on result:

other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 1 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.

Results 3

Reading:

2nd reading

Hours after challenge:

48

Group:

negative control

Dose level:

1 %

No. with + reactions:

0

Total no. in group:

9

Remarks on result:

other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 1 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 9.0.

Results 4

Reading:

2nd reading

Hours after challenge:

48

Group:

test chemical

Dose level:

1 %

No. with + reactions:

0

Total no. in group:

20

Remarks on result:

other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 1 %. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.

Results 5

Group:

positive control

Dose level:

n/a

Remarks on result:

not measured/tested

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:

GHS criteria not met

Conclusions:

Delayed dermal sensitisation has been investigated using the maximisation test according to OECD/EU test guidelines. The substance did not induce delayed dermal sensitisation in the guinea pig.

Executive summary:

Delayed dermal sensitisation has been investigated using the maximisation test according to OECD/EU test guidelines. The substance did not induce delayed dermal sensitisation in the guinea pig.