Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 696-616-8 | CAS number: 1268344-02-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
The key study is a ready biodegradability test (OECD 301B) result, test performed according guidelines meeting validity criteria.
Results from a non-glp semi continuous activated sludge test in combination with closed bottle test results is used as supporting study.
Peer reviewed published articles are used as supporting studies
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- readily biodegradable
Additional information
Ethanol, 2,2’-[[3-[2-hydroxyethyl]amino]propyl]iminobis-, N-alkyl derivatives are surfactants consisting of a hydrophilic part i.e. tri(hydroxyethyl)-1,3-diaminopropane linked to a hydrophobic alkyl moiety. Biodegradation of both moieties of surfactants usually requires the concerted action of at least two microorganisms as a single organism usually lacks the full complement of enzymatic capabilities (van Ginkel, 1996). The biodegradation mechanism of ethanol, 2,2’-[[3-[2-hydroxyethyl]amino]propyl]iminobis-, N-alkyl derivatives was deduced from semi-continuous activated sludge (SCAS) test results. In the SCAS test activated sludge was exposed to a specified concentration of 2,2’-[[3-[2-hydroxyethyl]amino]propyl]iminobis-, N-(coco alkyl) derivatives and the non-purgeable organic carbon (NPOC) was analysed frequently to determine the carbon removal (van Ginkel et al, 2009). This test has been performed according to OECD Test Guidelines (OECD, 1981). During the first two months (except day 3) the carbon removal ranged from 56 to 75% which suggests formation of hydrophilic compound(s). Thereafter the NPOC values of effluent of the unit fed with domestic wastewater spiked with ethanol, 2,2’-[[3-[2-hydroxyethyl]amino]propyl]iminobis-, N-(coco alkyl) derivativesdid decrease further. During the last weeks of the test the removal of ethanol, 2,2’-[[3-[2-hydroxyethyl]amino]propyl]iminobis-, N-(coco alkyl) derivatives increased to a level of >80% indicating degradation of the hydrophilic moeity.The most likely mechanism derived from SCAS test results is a C-N cleavage and a subsequent oxidation of the hydrophobic part (alkyl chain). This oxidation leads to formation of water-soluble tri(hydroxyethyl)-1,3-diaminopropane. Tri(hydroxyethyl)-1,3-diaminopropane represents approximately 40% of the carbon of the surfactant (Figure, see attached documents). The alkyl chain and the hydrophilic moiety are probably degraded by a consortium of microorganisms.
The initial partial carbon removal and the >80% carbon removal at the end of the test do rule out formation of persistent water-soluble substituted 1,3-diaminopropanes. At the end of the SCAS test the total organic nitrogen content was measured in the test and control unit to assess the removal of organic carbon. The removal of total organic nitrogen was 78% (80%, 75%). The high organic nitrogen removal percentages also prove that ethanol, 2,2’-[[3-[2-hydroxyethyl]amino]propyl]iminobis-, N-(coco alkyl) derivatives are ultimately biodegradable. A Closed Bottle test inoculated with adapted activated sludge from the SCAS test is suitable to predict ultimate biodegradation of ethanol, 2,2’-[[3-[2-hydroxyethyl]amino]propyl]iminobis-, N-(coco alkyl) derivatives, which is expected not to be in the aqueous phase because of their capacity to adsorb.In a Closed Bottle test with adapted sludge, ethanol, 2,2’-[[3-[2-hydroxyethyl]amino]propyl]iminobis-, N-(hydrogenated coco alkyl) derivativesamineis biodegraded 63% at day 28. The biodegradation percentage in excess of 60 indicates ultimate (complete) degradation. In ready biodegradability tests, the two moieties of this fatty amine derivative are degraded sequentially. The degradation curve will therefore be the sum of two growth curves. The biodegradation of the two moieties may be fully in line with the time-day window criterion when judged as separate chemicals. The time window criterion was developed on the assumption that a compound is degraded according to the “standard” growth curve in ready biodegradability tests. The time-window should therefore be ignored as a pass fail criterion for this surfactant in ready biodegradability tests. Ethanol, 2,2’-[[3-[2-hydroxyethyl]amino]propyl]iminobis-, N-(coco alkyl) derivativesis not readily biodegradable in a “standard” Closed Bottle test. The biodegradation is probably jeopardized by the toxicity of the test substance in the test. Inhibition of biodegradation by the test substance can in some cases be prevented through the addition of humic acid, lignosulphonic acid or silica gel, all known for their capacity to reduce the toxicity of cationic surfactants (van Ginkel et al, 2008). A ready biodegradability result was obtained with ethanol, 2,2’-[[3 -[2 -hydroxyethyl]amino]propyl]iminobis-, N-(coco alkyl) derivatives was obtained with humic acid.The biodegradation percentages were 63 and 75% at day 28 and 42, respectively. A carbon dioxide evolution test (Sturm test) incompliance with the OECD principles of Good Laboratory Practice was carried out with ethanol, 2,2’-[[3 -[2 -hydroxyethyl]amino]propyl]-iminobis-, N-(hydrogenated tallow alkyl) derivatives (Mead, 1997). This substance was biodegraded 61% at day 28. The time-window was ignored as a pass fail criterion because of the biodegradation kinetics. Hence 2,2’-[[3-[2-hydroxyethyl]amino]propyl]iminobis-, N-alkyl derivatives with alkyl chain lengths ranging from 12 to 18 carbons should be classified as readily biodegradable.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
