Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term toxicity to fish
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: RELIABLE SUMMARY REPORT.
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
review article or handbook
Title:
HEAVY FUEL OILS. ROBUST SUMMARY OF INFORMATION ON HEAVY FUEL OILS.
Author:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
Year:
2003
Bibliographic source:
HEAVY FUEL OILS. ROBUST SUMMARY OF INFORMATION ON HEAVY FUEL OILS. PG 21

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 203 (Fish, Acute Toxicity Test)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Fuel oil, residual
EC Number:
270-675-6
EC Name:
Fuel oil, residual
Cas Number:
68476-33-5
IUPAC Name:
68476-33-5

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
yes

Test solutions

Vehicle:
not specified

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Oncorhynchus mykiss (previous name: Salmo gairdneri)

Study design

Test type:
semi-static
Water media type:
freshwater
Total exposure duration:
96 h

Results and discussion

Effect concentrations
Duration:
96 h
Dose descriptor:
LL0
Effect conc.:
>= 1 000 mg/L
Conc. based on:
not specified
Basis for effect:
mortality (fish)

Any other information on results incl. tables

Sublethal observations / clinical signs:

No fish exposed to WAF of light fuel oil died during the test. 96-hr LL0 = 1000 mg/l based on nominal loading rates. After 96 h, 1 of the 7 control fish died. All fish in the 100 mg/l treatment exhibited no toxic symptoms. All fish in the 1000 mg/l WAF showed abnormal swimming. Total peak area of the dissolved components of each batch of freshly prepared WAFs was similar. Peak area values ranged from 19-21 x 108 at loading rate of 1000 mg/l and 9-11 x 108 at 100 mg/l. Peak profile was different at different loading rates but peak profile for new and old media was similar. Mean reduction in total peak area was 27% during the test (range 5 - 47%). Peak profiles for the WAFs differed significantly from profile of light fuel oil in dichloromethane. Only two loading rates were tested which is less than a minimum of five concentrations stated in the guidelines. Water hardness was higher than targeted range of 50 - 250 mg/l as CaCO3. Hardness range of 286 - 292 mg/l as CaCO3 was normal for this laboratory and did not adversely affect the health of the fish.

Applicant's summary and conclusion