Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.3 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
other: ECETOC Technical Report No. 110_Page 62
Overall assessment factor (AF):
160
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
LOAEC
Value:
42 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Comparable resorption for oral and inhalation routes assumed; human body weight of 70 kg; respiration volume of 10 m3 for 8 working hours
AF for dose response relationship:
2
Justification:
No NOAEL could be estalished and the LOAEL is used as the base for the DNEL derivation. The effect at LOAEL was limited to reduced spleen weight of fetuses, therefore the use of 2 as additional factor is considered to be appropriate.
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
The exposure duration covered the entire second and the third term of the pregnancy; in the supportng study (OECD 422), in which the treatment covered the entire pregnancy, no effect on numbers of corpora lutea and implantation sites was observed; no bioaccumulating property can be assigned for the registration substance.
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
The allometric scaling factor from rat is 4 according to ECHA REACH Guidance
AF for other interspecies differences:
10
Justification:
According to the ECETOC Technical Report No. 110_Page 62
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
According to the ECETOC Technical Report No. 110_Page 62
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
All data are Klimish 1 or 2
AF for remaining uncertainties:
2
Justification:
For some endpoints read-across is used.
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
other toxicological threshold
Value:
0.3 mg/m³
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
other toxicological threshold
Value:
0.3 mg/m³
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
other toxicological threshold
Value:
0.3 mg/m³
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.04 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
other: ECETOC Technical Report No. 110_Page 62
Overall assessment factor (AF):
160
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
LOAEL
Value:
6 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Comparable resorption for oral and inhalation routes assumed; human body weight of 70 kg; respiration volume of 10 m3 for 8 working hours
AF for dose response relationship:
2
Justification:
No NOAEL could be estalished and the LOAEL is used as the base for the DNEL derivation. The effect at LOAEL was limited to reduced spleen weight of fetuses, therefore the use of 2 as additional factor is considered to be appropriate.
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
The exposure duration covered the entire second and the third term of the pregnancy; in the supportng study (OECD 422), in which the treatment covered the entire pregnancy, no effect on numbers of corpora lutea and implantation sites was observed; no bioaccumulating property can be assigned for the registration substance.
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
The allometric scaling factor from rat is 4 according to ECHA REACH Guidance
AF for other interspecies differences:
10
Justification:
According to ECETOC Technical Report No. 110_Page 62
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
According to ECETOC Technical Report No. 110_Page 62
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
All data are Klinish 1 or 2
AF for remaining uncertainties:
2
Justification:
Read-across is used for some endpoints
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
other toxicological threshold
Value:
0.04 mg/kg bw/day
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

Relevant chemical species for exposure- and risk assessment

The registration substance is a salt of a weak acid and is expected dissociate immediately when dissolved in aqueous system or in biological fluid. It should be mentioned here, that manufacture and use of the registration substance occurs only as dissolved in aqueous system. Therefore, the relevant chemical species for worker exposure is the corresponding acid.  Accordingly, the exposure- and risk assessment should be performed for its acid form, (Pentapropenyl succinimido)-caproic acid.

It is apparent therefore, that the DNEL to be used for the risk assessment should be based on the dose of (Pentapropenyl succinimido)-caproic acid.

For that purpose, the LOAEL obtained in the provided key study should be extrapolated for its acid form.

For the LOAEL for the acid form the only factor to be considered is the molecular mass difference (420 g/mol vs ca. 530 g/mol). In the presented key study, the applied doses were 8, 40 and 200 mg/kg bw, corresponding to 6, 30 and 160 mg/kg bw for the acid form. For the DNEL derivation the dose levels of 6 mg/kg bw as LOAEL will be used.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
high hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
high hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
other toxicological threshold
Value:
1.5 µg/kg bw/day
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population