Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

The test item was not mutagenic in the baterial reverse mutation assay according to OECD TG 471 with and without S9 mix.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
03 April 2017 - 13 April 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
1997
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Version / remarks:
May 2008
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
Version / remarks:
1993
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
liver S9 mix from rats pretreated with ß-Naphthoflavone/Phenobarbital
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
The test material showed very limited solubility in the vehicle. A maximum concentration of 88.9 μg/plate was selected, in order that initial treatments were performed up to the maximum recommended concentration according to current regulatory guidelines (OECD TG 471, 1997).
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle/solvent used: acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Comparing the standard solvents for this assay indicated the test item showed best solubility performance in acetone.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
acetone
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
9-aminoacridine
sodium azide
other: denauomycin, 2-aminoanthracene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION:in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 2-3 days

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3

Evaluation criteria:
A test material was to be defined as negative or non-mutagenic in this assay if
• the assay was to be considered valid, and
• "no" or "weak increases" occurred in the test series performed ("weak increases" randomly occur due to experimental variation)

For valid data, the test material was considered tobe positive or mutagenic if:
• a dose dependent (over at least two test material concentrations) increase in the number of revertants was induced, the maximal effect was a "clear increase", and the effects were reproduced at similar concentration levels in the same test system, or
• "clear increases" occurred at least at one test material concentration, higher concentrations showed strong precipitation or cytotoxicity, and the effects were reproduced at the same concentration level in the same test system.

In general, two series of experiments must be performed. However, there is no requirement for verification of aclearpositive response (OECD TG471, 1997).
Results which only partially satisfied the above criteria were dealt with on a case-by-case basis. Biological relevance was taken into account, for example consistency of response within and between concentrations and (where applicable) between experiments.
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: Yes, at the highest concentration tested.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: Comparing the standard solvents for this assay indicated that the test item showed best solubility performance in acetone. Based on these prelirninary data, acetone was selected as vehicle for the current experiment. However, the test material showed very limited solubility in acetone also. A maximum concentration of 88.9 μg/plate was selected, in order that initial treatments were performed up to the maximum recommended concentration according to current regulatory guidelines (OECD TG471, 1997).

Conclusions:
The test item was not mutagenic in the baterial reverse mutation assay according to OECD TG 471 with and without S9 mix.
Executive summary:

The present study was conducted to investigate the test material for its mutagenic potential in a bacterial reverse gene mutation assay in the absence and in the presence of a rat liver metabolizing system (S9 mix).

The investigations for the mutagenic potential of the test item were performed using Salmonella typhimurium test strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537, and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA. The plate incorporation test with and without addition of liver S9 mix from rats pretreated with ß-Naphthoflavone/Phenobarbital was used. In this study, two experimental series were performed. The S9 mix used contained 10% S9 in the first and 20% S9 in the second series, respectively.

Solvent and positive control treatments were included for all strains. The mean numbers of revertant colonies all fell within acceptable ranges for solvent control treatments, and were clearly elevated by positive control treatments, thus, showing the expected reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S9 mix used.

Following treatment of all bacteria test strains with the test item in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no relevant increases in revertant numbers were observed.

It was concluded that with and without addition of S9 mix as the exogenous metabolizing system, the test item was not mutagenic under the experimental conditions described.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

The present study was conducted to investigate the test material for its mutagenic potential in a bacterial reverse gene mutation assay in the absence and in the presence of a rat liver metabolizing system (S9 mix).

The investigations for the mutagenic potential of the test item were performed using Salmonella typhimurium test strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537, and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA. The plate incorporation test with and without addition of liver S9 mix from rats pretreated with ß-Naphthoflavone/Phenobarbital was used. In this study, two experimental series were performed. The S9 mix used contained 10% S9 in the first and 20% S9 in the second series, respectively.

Solvent and positive control treatments were included for all strains. The mean numbers of revertant colonies all fell within acceptable ranges for solvent control treatments, and were clearly elevated by positive control treatments, thus, showing the expected reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S9 mix used.

Following treatment of all bacteria test strains with the test item in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no relevant increases in revertant numbers were observed.

It was concluded that with and without addition of S9 mix as the exogenous metabolizing system, the test item was not mutagenic under the experimental conditions described.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data, the test item is not considered to be classified and labelled as mutagenic according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.