Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 286-344-4 | CAS number: 85209-91-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Well documented and reported study fully adequate for assessment. The study was conducted according to an internationally accepted technical guideline and in compliance with GLP in a recognized contract research organization.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only one strain under study: E. coli
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only one strain under study: E. coli
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only one strain under study: E. coli
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Tryptophan-Locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: nutrient broth
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix ( Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Range finding: seven concentrations up to 5000 µg/plate
Main test: 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility of the test material - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- furylfuramide
- Remarks:
- Solved in DMSO; without S9 mix; 0,05 µg/plate
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene (CAS NO.: 613-13-8)
- Remarks:
- Solved in DMSO; with S9 mix; 10 µg/plate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
- Preincubation period: 30 min., in glass vessels, with test material in solution
- Incubation time: 72 hours (petri dishes containing minimal agar without tryptophan)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates/dose
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY in the range finding test
- Method: cloning efficiency - Evaluation criteria:
- The mutagenic activity of a test substance was assessed by applying the following criteria:
- increase in revertant colony numbers of at least twice the concurrent solvent/vehicle controls, with some evidence of a positive dose-response relationship (...)
- If the results obtained fail to satisfy the criteria for a clear "positive" or "negative" response, the test data may be subjected to analysis to determine the statistical significance of any increases in revertant colony numbers.
- Statistics:
- The statistical procedures used will be those described by Mahon et al (1989) and will usually be analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Visible thinning of the background lawn of non-revertant cells was obtained following exposure to BC-300 at 5000 µg/plate.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results : negative
It is concluded that, under the test conditions employed, the test material BC-300 showed no evidence of mutagenic activity in this bacterial system. - Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Well documented and reported study fully adequate for assessment. The study was conducted according to an internationally accepted technical guideline and in compliance with GLP in a recognized contract research organization.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- First Addendum to OECD Guidelines No. 4 71, "Salmonella typhimurium, Reverse Mutation Assay", adopted May 26, 1983
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- EEC Directive 84/449, L 251, B 14, p. 143-145
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine locus in selected strains
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: nutrient medium: 8 g Difco Nutrient Broth, 5 g NaCl in 20 ml (for 0,5 ml bacterial suspension)
- Storage: stock cultures in ampoules with nutrient broth and 5 % DMSO in liquid nitrogen
- Properly maintained: yes
Regular checking of the properties of the strains with regard to membrane permeability and ampicillin resistance as well as normal spontaneous mutation rates is performed in C C R according to Ames et al. (1970, 1977) . In this way it was ensured that the experimental conditions set down by Ames were fulfilled. - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix (Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-study with strain TA 98 and TA 100: 1 – 5000 µg/plate
Main-experiments:
Exp. I : TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100:
10.0; 33.3; 100.0; 333.3; 1000.0 and 5000.0 µg /plate
Exp. II : TA 1535, TA 98, TA 100:
10.0; 33.3; 100.0; 333.3; 1000.0 and 5000.0 µg/plate
Exp. II: TA 1537:
10.0; 33.3; 66.6; 333.3; 100.0; 666.6 and 1000.0 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent: Methanol. On the day of experiment, the test article was dissolved.
Justification: The solvent was chosen because of its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity for the bacteria. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Concurrent untreated and solvent controls were performed.
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- sodium azide for strains: TA 1535, TA 100 without metabolic activation, 10 µg/plate, dissolved in aqua dest..
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine
- Remarks:
- 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine for strains TA 1537, TA 98 without metabolic activation, dissolved in DMSO, 50 µg/plate.
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- 2-aminoanthracene for all strains with metabolic activation, dissolved in DMSO, 10 µg /plate.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 72h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3/strain/dose for each of the two experiments. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test material is considered as positive if either a significant dose-related increase in the number of revertants or a significant and reproducible increase for at least one test concentration is induced.
A significant response is described as follows:
The test material is considered as mutagen if in strain TA 100 the number of reversions is at least twice as high and in strains TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 98 it is at least three times higher as compared to the spontaneous reversion rate.
Also, a dose-dependent increase in the number of revertants is regarded as an indication of possibly existing mutagenic potential of the test material regardless whether the highest dose induced the above described enhancement factors or not. - Statistics:
- No appropriate statistical method was available.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- partial or complete reduction in the number of revertants, at the higher dose levels with and without metabolic activation in experiment I and II in all strains used
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results : negative
It can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test material did not induce point mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used. - Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Well documented and reported study fully adequate for assessment. The study was conducted according to an internationally accepted technical guideline and in compliance with GLP in a recognized contract research organization.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- First Addendum to the OECD Guideline 473, adopted May 26, 1983
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EEC Directive 84/449, L 251, B 10, p. 131-133
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Subpart F-Genetic Toxicology, Revision July 1, 1986, "In vitro mammalian cytogenetics"
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Stored in liquid nitrogen, thawed stock cultures are propagated at 37°C in 80 cm2 plastic flasks
- Cell culture medium: MEM (minimal essential medium; SEROMED; 12247 Berlin) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; SEROMED).
- Properly maintained: yes. The cells are subcultured twice weekly. The cell cultures are incubated at 37°C and 4.5 % carbon dioxide atmosphere.
- Checked for Mycoplasma contamination and for karyotype stability: yes, before freezing. - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix (Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-experiment:
without S9 mix:
7 h: 1.0; 1.5; 2.0; 3.0 µg/ml
18 h: 0.1; 0.3; 1.0; 1.5; 2.0; 3.0 µg/ml
28 h: 1.0; 1.5; 2.0; 3.0 µg/ml
with S9 mix:
7 h: 4.0; 6.0; 8.0; 10.0 µg/ml
18 h: 0.4; 1.0; 4.0; 6.0; 8.0; 10.0 µg/ml
28 h: 4.0; 6.0; 8.0; 10.0 µg/ml
Main-experiment:
without S9 mix:
7 h: 1.5 µg/ml
18 h: 0.1; 1.0; 2.0 µg/ml
28 h: 2.0 µg/ml
with S9 mix:
7 h: 4.0 µg/ml
18 h: 0.4; 4.0; 8.0 µg/ml
28 h: 8.0 µg/ml - Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent used: Ethanol
Justification for the choice of solvent: The solvent was chosen according to its solubulity properties and its non-toxcicity for the cells. The final concentration of ethanol in the culture medium did not exceed 1 % v/v. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- solvent: ethanol
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix; dissolved in nutrient medium, final conc.: 0.72 mg/ml (5.76 mM)
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix; dissolved in nutrient medium, final conc.: 1.40 ~g/ml (5.00 µM)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in serum free medium containing the test article, either without S9 mix or with 20 µl S9 mix
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48h and 55h
- Exposure duration: 4h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 7h, 28 h (48h preincubation), 18h (55h preincubation)
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colcemid (0.2 µg/ml culture medium) added after 5, 15.5 and 25.5 h (2-2.5h before fixation)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa (Merck)
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes - Evaluation criteria:
- The test material is classified as mutagenic
- if it induces either a significant dose-related increase in the number of structural chromosomal aberrations or
- a significant positive response for at least one of the test points.
A test article producing neither a significant dose-related increase in the number of structural chromosomal aberrations nor a significant positive response at any one of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system. This can be confirmed by means of the chi-square test. However, both biological and statistical significance should be considered together. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance at the five per cent level (P < 0.05) was evaluated by means of the chi-square test. Evaluation was performed only for cells carrying aberrations exclusive gaps.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- colony forming ability reduced > 0,1 µg/ml without S9 mix, > 3,0 µg/ml with S9 mix (results taken from the pre-experiment).
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING: in a pre-experiment using the plating efficiency assay as indicator for toxicity response.
Treatment with concentrations higher than 0.1 µg/ml (without S9 mix) and 3.0 µg/ml (with S9 mix) reduced clearly the plating efficiency of the V79 cells. Also the mitotic index was reduced after treatment with the highest concentration at each fixation interval in the presence and absence of S9 mix.
With higher concentrations >2.0 µg/ml (without S9 mix) and >8.0 µg/ml (with S9 mix)) no or not enough scorable cells could be found. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results : negative
It can be stated that in the study described and under the experimental conditions reported, the test material did not induce structural chromosome aberrations as determined by the chromosomal aberration test in the V79 Chinese hamster cell line.
Therefore, NA-11 is considered to be non-mutagenic in this chromosomal aberration test. - Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Well documented and reported study fully adequate for assessment. The study was conducted according to an internationally accepted technical guideline and in compliance with GLP in a recognized contract research organization.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- Second Addendum, Section 4, No. 476, adopted April 4, 1984
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EEC Directive 87/302, L 133, p. 61 - 63
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA; 40 CFR; Ch.I; Part 798; Detection of gene mutation in somatic cells in culture; pp. 717-720 (7-1-86 Edition)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Gene for HGPRT (hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Stored in liquid nitrogen, thawed stock cultures are propagated at 37°C in 80 cm2 plastic flasks
- Cell culture medium: MEM (minimal essential medium; SEROMED; D-12247 Berlin) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; SEROMED).
- Properly maintained: yes. The cells are subcultured twice weekly. The cell cultures are incubated at 37°C and 4.5 % carbon dioxide atmosphere.
- Checked for Mycoplasma contamination and for karyotype stability: yes, before freezing.
- For the selection of mutants, the medium is supplemented with 11 µg/ml thioguanine. - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix (The S9 mix preparation was performed according to Ames et al.(1977)).
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-experiment for toxicity (colony forming ability):
Without and with metabolic activation 0.01, 0.10, 1.00, 3.00, 10.00, 30.00, 60.00, 100.00 µg/ml
Main-Experiment:
with S9 mix: 0.10, 0.30, 1.00, 2.00, 6.00, 10.00 µg/ml
without S9 mix: 0.03, 0.10, 0.30, 1.00, 2.00, 3.00 µg/ml - Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent used: ethanol (test material was dissolved on the day of the experiment)
Justification for the solvent: The solvent was chosen according to its solubility properties and its relative nontoxicity for the cells.
The final concentration of the solvent in the culture medium did not exceed 1 % v/v. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- EMS without S9 mix, dissolved in nutrient medium 1 mg/ml (8mM)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- Remarks:
- DMBA with S9 mix, dissolved in DMSO (Dimethylsulfoxid), conc. in nutrient medium: 15.4 µg/ml (60,1 µM)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: test material in serum free medium is given to a cell suspension
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 24h, seeded in MEM with 10% FCS (complete medium).
- Exposure duration: 4h in serum-free medium containing the test material, either without S9 mix or with 20 µg/ml S9 mix.
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): day 1-9
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): mutant selection medium day 9 - 17
- Cloning efficiency: day 9 - 16
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 7 days for plating efficiency and dose relationsship, 15 days for cloning efficiency determinations, 16 days for mutant selection.
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): thioguanine (6TG)
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 10% methylene blue in 0.01% KOH solution.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
determination of toxicity: in duplicate per experimental point.
determination of mutation rates: 1 flask per experimental point.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: concentration-related cloning efficiency: day 8: fixation and staining of colonies. - Evaluation criteria:
- The gene mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a) the numbers of mutant colonies per 10e6 cells found in the negative and/or solvent controls fall within the laboratory historical control range data : 0-45 mutants/10e6 cells.
b) the positive control substances must produce a significant increase in mutant colony frequencies.
c) the colonic efficiency (absolute value) of the negative and/or solvent controls must exceed 50% .
A significant response is described as follows:
The test article is classified as mutagenic
- if it induces reproducibly with at least one of the concentrations a mutation frequency that is three times higher than the spontaneous mutation frequency in the experiment or
- if there is a reproducible concentration - related increase in the mutation frequency.
Such evaluation may be considered independently of an enhancement factor for induced mutants.
However, in a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the corresponding negative control data. If there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate as compared to the range normally found (5 - 45 mutants per 106 cells) a seemingly concentration-related increase of the mutations within this range will be regarded as to be irrelevant. - Statistics:
- No appropriate statistical method is available.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- ; reduced plating efficiency >0,10 µg/ml without S9 mix, >3,00µg/ml with S9 (values taken from the pre-experiment)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
Under the conditions of this study, NA-11 did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in Chinese hamster V79 cells either with or without metabolic activation.
Referenceopen allclose all
Up to the highest investigated dose, neither a significant and reproducible increase of the number of revertants was found in any strain as compared to the solvent control nor a concentration- dependent enhancement of the revertant number exists. The presence of liver microsomal activation did not influence these findings.
Table 1: Results WITHOUT S9 mix (/ = not performed)
Dose µg/plate |
Strains Experiment |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
||||
I |
II |
I |
II |
I |
II |
I |
II |
||
Neg. control |
9 |
9 |
10 |
6 |
24 |
21 |
107 |
96 |
|
Solvent control |
8 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
23 |
16 |
99 |
94 |
|
10.0 |
10 |
13 |
5 |
6 |
24 |
19 |
111 |
98 |
|
33.3 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
32 |
16 |
99 |
99 |
|
66.6 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
10 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
|
100.0 |
8 |
7 |
6 |
9 |
21 |
15 |
78 |
76 |
|
333.3 |
8 |
8 |
5 |
7 |
23 |
17 |
75 |
44 |
|
666.6 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
2 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
|
1000.0 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
11 |
9 |
29 |
8 |
|
5000.0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
/ |
0 |
1 |
24 |
4 |
|
Pos. contr.: Sodium azid 10 µg/plate |
122 |
964 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
8 |
|
Pos. control: 4-Nitro-o-phenylene-diamine 50 µg/plate |
|
|
193 |
318 |
1981 |
1913 |
|
|
Table 2: Results WITH S9 mix (/ = not performed)
Dose µg/plate |
Strains Experiment |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
||||
I |
II |
I |
II |
I |
II |
I |
II |
||
Neg. control |
11 |
13 |
5 |
8 |
43 |
20 |
95 |
93 |
|
Solvent control |
9 |
13 |
7 |
11 |
43 |
32 |
99 |
115 |
|
10.0 |
11 |
13 |
12 |
11 |
44 |
27 |
128 |
120 |
|
33.3 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
14 |
46 |
27 |
147 |
102 |
|
66.6 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
9 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
|
100.0 |
11 |
12 |
8 |
10 |
30 |
28 |
112 |
122 |
|
333.3 |
12 |
15 |
7 |
10 |
38 |
21 |
132 |
126 |
|
666.6 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
6 |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
|
1000.0 |
7 |
11 |
4 |
5 |
27 |
18 |
123 |
86 |
|
5000.0 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
/ |
1 |
0 |
27 |
13 |
|
Pos. contr.: 2-Amino-anthracene 10 µg/plate |
126 |
117 |
111 |
132 |
772 |
753 |
783 |
926 |
The aberration rates of the cells after treatment with the test article (0.0 % - 3.5 %) were in or near to the range of the control values: 0.5 % - 2.0 %. There was no relevant increase in cells with structural aberrations after treatment with the test material at any fixation interval either without or with metabolic activation by S9 mix.
Table 1: Mutagenicity data
Assay Fixation interval: 7h |
Number of cells analysed |
Conc. µg/ml |
S9 mix |
Per cent aberrant cells |
||
incl. gaps |
excl. gaps |
exchanges |
||||
Solvent control |
200 |
0,0 |
- |
2,00 |
1,50 |
0,00 |
Test material |
200 |
1,5 |
- |
6,50 |
3,50 |
0,00 |
Solvent control |
200 |
0,0 |
+ |
5,50 |
2,00 |
0,,50 |
Test material |
200 |
4,0 |
+ |
5,50 |
1,00 |
0,00 |
Assay Fixation interval:18h |
Number of cells analysed |
Conc. µg/ml |
S9 mix |
Per cent aberrant cells |
||
Incl. gaps |
excl. gaps |
exchanges |
||||
Negative control |
200 |
0,0 |
- |
2,00 |
1,50 |
0,50 |
Solvent control |
200 |
0,0 |
- |
4,00 |
1,50 |
0,00 |
Positive control EMS |
200 |
0,72 |
- |
14,00 |
9,00 |
5,50 |
Test material |
200 |
0,1 |
- |
3,50 |
2,00 |
0,50 |
Test material |
200 |
1,0 |
- |
4,00 |
2,50 |
0,00 |
Test material |
200 |
2,0 |
- |
5,00 |
2,50 |
1,50 |
Negative Control |
200 |
0,0 |
+ |
2,50 |
0,50 |
0,00 |
Solvent control |
200 |
0,0 |
+ |
1,00 |
1,00 |
0,50 |
Positive Control CPA |
200 |
1,4 |
+ |
22,50 |
20,50 |
9,00 |
Test material |
200 |
0,4 |
+ |
3,00 |
1,00 |
0,00 |
Test material |
200 |
4,0 |
+ |
1,50 |
0,00 |
0,00 |
Test material |
200 |
8,0 |
+ |
1,00 |
0,50 |
0,,50 |
Assay Fixation interval:28h |
Number of cells analysed |
Conc. µg/ml |
S9 mix |
Per cent aberrant cells
|
||
incl. gaps |
excl. gaps |
exchanges |
||||
Solvent control |
200 |
0,0 |
- |
4,00 |
2,00 |
1,50 |
Test material |
200 |
2,0 |
- |
3,50 |
1,50 |
0,50 |
Solvent control |
200 |
0,0 |
+ |
4,00 |
2,00 |
1,50 |
Test material |
200 |
8,0 |
+ |
5,00 |
3,00 |
0,00 |
The study was performed in two independent experiments using identical procedures, both with and without liver microsomal activation.
Table 1: Mutagenity data - Experiment I
Concentration µg/ml |
S9 |
Mean number of mutant colonies per flask |
Mutant colonies per 10e6 cells |
|
|
|
|
Negative control 0,00 |
- |
7,8 |
33,6 |
Positive contr.- EMS |
- |
151,6 |
631,6 |
Test material 0,03 |
- |
12,6 |
40,9 |
0,10 |
- |
10,8 |
33,8 |
0,30 |
- |
8,6 |
26,9 |
1,00 |
- |
0,0 |
0,0 |
2,00 |
- |
severe toxic effects |
|
3,00 |
- |
severe toxic effects |
|
|
|
|
|
Negative control |
+ |
8,8 |
29,5 |
Negative control-DMSO |
+ |
11,4 |
40,2 |
Positive control - DMBA |
+ |
67,2 |
183,0 |
Test material 0,10 |
+ |
5,4 |
18,0 |
0,30 |
+ |
6,6 |
22,9 |
1,00 | + | 14,4 | 37,7 |
3,00 | + | 6,6 |
12,5 |
6,00 | + | severe toxic effects | |
10,00 | + | severe toxic effects |
Table 2: Mutagenity data - Experiment II
Concentrationµg/ml
|
S9 |
Mean number of mutant colonies per flask |
Mutant colonies per 10e6 cells |
Negative control |
- |
2,4 |
8,6 |
Positive control - EMS |
- |
220,0 |
962,4 |
Test material 0,03 |
- |
13,4 |
49,5 |
0,10 |
- |
15,6 |
48,2 |
0,30 |
- |
15,0 |
65,8 |
1,00 |
- |
6,2 |
24,1 |
2,00 |
- |
7,0 |
22,5 |
3,00 |
- |
7,4 |
29,8 |
|
|
|
|
Negative control |
+ |
8,6 |
41,3 |
Negative control- DMSO |
+ |
14,2 |
65,9 |
Positive control- DMBA |
+ |
46,8 |
239,0 |
Test material 0,10 |
+ |
6,0 |
26,8 |
0,30 |
+ |
10,6 |
51,2 |
1,00 |
+ |
8,0 |
27,0 |
3,00 |
+ |
8,8 |
46,8 |
6,00 |
+ |
6,6 |
28,9 |
10,00 |
+ |
1,2 |
4,8 |
The solvent control for the positive control of the second experiment was excluded because the mutation rate (65.9 mutants/106 cells) exceeded the range of the historic controls (5 - 45 mutants/ 106 cells.). This has no influence on the'result of the test since all evaluations are based on the solvent control.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the negative results attained in all in vitro genotoxicity studies NA-11 is considered not to be genotoxic and does not warrant any classification regarding mutagenicity according to European classification rules [ REGULATION (EC) 1272/2008].
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.