Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Sensitisation data (human)

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sensitisation data (humans)
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
The study was peer-reviewed and rated reliable within the framework of the EU RAR “Zinc stearate (CAS# 91051-01-3, CAS# 557-05-1) Part II – Human Health. EUR 21168 EN. Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. ECB - Existing Substances. Final Report, 2004". In accordance with Section 1 (0.5), Annex I of Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 (REACH), this study was considered reliable with restrictions.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
other: CIR Cosmetic Ingredient Revie, peer-reviewed in EU RAR
Title:
Submission of data by CTFA. Unpublished safety data on the Lithium Stearate Group. Schwartz-Peck Prophetic Patch Test and Draize-Shelanski Repeated Insult Patch Test. Zinc Stearate (10 percent) in eye shadow 923 - 100.
Author:
CTFA
Year:
1976
Bibliographic source:
Busch, J.T., CIR Cosmetic Ingredient Review (1982). Int J Toxicol 1 (2), 143-177.
Reference Type:
other: communication
Title:
Zinc stearate (10 %) in eye shadow 923-100
Author:
CIR Safety.org, Cosmetic Ingredient Review 1101 17th St. N. W. Suite 412 Washington D. C. 20036-4702, USA
Year:
2010
Bibliographic source:
Communication to bibliographic source Busch, J.T, CIR Cosmetic Ingredient Review (1982), Int J Toxicol 1 (2), 143-177.

Materials and methods

Type of sensitisation studied:
skin
Study type:
study with volunteers
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Two eyeshadow formulations, each containing 10 % zinc stearate, were tested by means of the Schwartz-Peck Prophetic Patch Test and the Draize-Shelanski Repeated Insult Patch Test.
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
91051-01-3
Cas Number:
91051-01-3
IUPAC Name:
91051-01-3
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, C16-18, zinc salts
EC Number:
293-049-4
EC Name:
Fatty acids, C16-18, zinc salts
IUPAC Name:
293-049-4
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Zinc stearate
Substances named zinc stearate or zinc distearate are considered equal to substance fatty acid, C16-18, zinc salts. Commercially produced stearic acid is always a mixture of what chemically was called stearic acid (C18) and palmitic acid (C16). In practice, the description “Fatty acids, C16-18, zinc salts” registered under CAS no 91051- 01-3 is a more exact fit with commercial zinc stearate (c.f. EU RAR “Zinc stearate (CAS# 91051-01-3, CAS# 557-05-1) Part II – Human Health. EUR 21168 EN, page 7).
No further information on the test material was stated.

Method

Type of population:
not specified
Ethical approval:
not specified
Subjects:
- Number of subjects exposed: 202 subjects participated in the Schwartz-Peck Prophetic Patch Test and 99 subjects participated in the Draize-Shelanski Repeated Insult Patch Test.
No further information on subjects was stated.
Clinical history:
Not stated
Controls:
Not stated
Route of administration:
dermal
Details on study design:
TYPE OF TEST(S) USED: patch test (Schwartz-Peck Prophetic Patch Test and the Draize-Shelanski Repeated Insult Patch Test)
No further information on the study design was stated.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
Results from the Schwartz-Peck Prophetic Patch Test: Virtually 0 reactions in 202 subjects
Results from Draize-Shelanski Repeated Insult Patch Test: Virtually 0 reactions in 99 subjects

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The results showed that two eyeshadow formulations, each containing 10 % zinc stearate, which were tested by means of the Schwartz-Peck Prophetic Patch Test and the Draize-Shelanski Repeated Insult Patch Test, resulted in virtually 0 reactions in the subjects.

Conclusions of EU RAR “Zinc stearate (CAS# 91051-01-3, CAS# 557-05-1) Part II – Human Health. EUR 21168 EN. Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. ECB - Existing Substances. Final Report, 2004: Based on the accepted derogation and the fact that zinc oxide is not a skin sensitiser, it is consequently concluded that zinc distearate is not likely to be skin sensitising, and therefore does not need to be classified/labelled. This is supported by the fact that the use of zinc distearate in pharmaceutical and cosmetic products is without reported skin sensitisation effects.