Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Utility of historical vehicle-control data in the interpretation of the local lymph node assay
Author:
D. A. BASKETTER, N. J. GILMOUR, D. BRIGGS, L.G. ULLMANN, G. F. GERBERICK, C. A. RYAN, R. J. DEARMAN, I. KIMBER
Year:
2003
Bibliographic source:
Contact Dermatitis 2003: 49: 37–41

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Version / remarks:
OECD, 2002
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
detailed documentation missing
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Methyl pyruvate
EC Number:
209-987-4
EC Name:
Methyl pyruvate
Cas Number:
600-22-6
Molecular formula:
C4H6O3
IUPAC Name:
methyl 2-oxopropanoate
Details on test material:
Obtained from Sigma (Poole, Dorset, UK).
No further data given.
Specific details on test material used for the study:
3-Methyl pyruvate (99%)

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: CBA/Ca
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- Age at study initiation: 7–12 weeks
No further details given.

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
1%, 2.5%, 5%, 10%
No. of animals per dose:
4
Details on study design:
Animales were treated topically on the dorsum of both ears with 25µl of test material or with an equal volume of the vehicle (AOO) alone. Treatment was performed daily for 3 consecutive days. 5 days following the initiation of exposure, all mice were injected via the tail vein with 250 µl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 20 µCi of tritiated thymidine. Mice were sacrificed 5 h later, and the draining lymph nodes excised and pooled for each experimental group.
Single cell suspension of LNCs was prepared by mechanical disaggregation. The LNC suspension was washed 2 times in an excess of PBS and then precipitated with 5% trichloroacetic acid at 4 celsius for 18 h. Pellets were resuspended in TCA, and the incorporation of tritiated thymidine measured by ß-scintillation counting.
Positive control substance(s):
not specified
Statistics:
The EC3 value was calculated by interpolating between 2 points on the SI axis, one immediately above and one immediately below the SI value of 3. The vehicle-treated control value (by definition, SI=1) cannot be used for the latter. Where the data points lying immediately above and below the SI value of 3 have the co-ordinates (a, b) and (c, d), respectively, then the EC3 value was calculated using the equation:
EC3 = C + [3 - d/b - d] (a - c)

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Results
Parameter:
EC3
Value:
2.4
Cellular proliferation data / Observations:
Test 1: dpm/node
AOO control 134
1% 791
2.5% 1541
5% 2618
10% 4565

Clear dose–response relationship, but in the context of an unusually low concurrent vehicle-control value of 134 disintegrations per minute (dpm)/node. This value was substantially below the mean control value obtained by this laboratory (2.5th percentile of respective historical control data is 187 dpm/node).

Test 2: dpm/node (repeated test)
AOO control 477
1% 576
2.5% 1531
5% 2232
10% 3791

EC3 = 2.4%

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The test substance 3-Methyl pyruvate has been found to be a skin sensitizer in the LLNA under the chosen testing conditions. The present data on dermal sensitization fulfill the criteria laid down in EU) 1272/2008, and therefore, a classification with "Skin sensitisation" (Category 1B) is warranted.