lithium 3-((3,4-dicyanophenyl)sulfonyl)propane-1-sulfonate)

Acute Toxicity: oral

Administrative data

Endpoint:

acute toxicity: oral

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

Between 07 June 2012 and 28 June 2012

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results.

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

2012

Report date:

2012

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Test guideline 1

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)

Deviations:

no

Test guideline 2

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)

Deviations:

no

GLP compliance:

yes (incl. QA statement)

Remarks:

No analysis was carried out to determine the homogeneity, concentration or stability of the test item formulation. This exception is considered not to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.

Test type:

acute toxic class method

Limit test:

yes

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

lithium 3-((3,4-dicyanophenyl)sulfonyl)propane-1-sulfonate)

EC Number:

700-777-2

Cas Number:

667889-11-4

Molecular formula:

C11H9N2O5S2Li

IUPAC Name:

lithium 3-((3,4-dicyanophenyl)sulfonyl)propane-1-sulfonate)

Test material form:

solid: particulate/powder

Remarks:

migrated information: powder

Details on test material:

Sponsor's identification: S193308
Description : white powder
Batch number : 422 (Bag 3)
Purity : 98.9%
Date received : 02 May 2012
Expiry date : not supplied
Storage conditions: room temperature in the dark
The integrity of supplied data relating to the identity, purity and stability of the test item is the responsibility of the Sponsor.

Test animals

Species:

rat

Strain:

Wistar

Sex:

female

Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:

Female Wistar (RccHan:WIST) strain rats were supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK. On receipt the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The animals were nulliparous and non-pregnant. After an acclimatisation period of at least five days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink marking on the tail and a number written on a cage card. At the start of the study the animals were eight to twelve weeks of age. The bodyweights fell within an interval of ±20% of the mean initial bodyweight of the first treated group.

The animals were housed in groups of three in suspended solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. With the exception of an overnight fast immediately before dosing and for approximately three to four hours after dosing, free access to mains drinking water and food (2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet, drinking water and bedding were routinely analysed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that would reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.

The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25°C and 30 to 70% respectively. Any occasional deviations from these targets were considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.

The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:

oral: gavage

Vehicle:

water

Details on oral exposure:

All animals were dosed once only by gavage, using a metal cannula attached to a graduated syringe.

Doses:

2000 mg/kg

No. of animals per sex per dose:

6 females@2000 mg/kg

Control animals:

no

Details on study design:

Using available information on the toxicity of the test item, 2000 mg/kg was chosen as the starting dose.
Groups of fasted animals were treated as follows:

Dose Level Concentration Dose Volume Number of Rats
(mg/kg) (mg/ml) (ml/kg) Female
2000 200 10 3
2000 200 10 3

All animals were dosed once only by gavage, using a metal cannula attached to a graduated syringe. The volume administered to each animal was calculated according to the fasted bodyweight at the time of dosing. Treatment of animals was sequential. Sufficient time was allowed between each group to confirm the survival of the previously dosed animals.

The animals were observed for deaths or overt signs of toxicity ½, 1, 2 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for fourteen days.
Individual bodyweights were recorded prior to dosing and seven and fourteen days after treatment. At the end of the observation period the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. All animals were subjected to gross pathological examination. This consisted of an external examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities for examination of major organs. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded. No tissues were retained.

Results and discussion

Effect levels

Sex:

female

Dose descriptor:

LD50

Effect level:

> 2 500 mg/kg bw

Based on:

test mat.

Remarks on result:

other: 95% CL not reported

Mortality:

Individual mortality data are given in Table 1.
There were no deaths.

Clinical signs:

other: Individual clinical observations are given in Table 1. No signs of systemic toxicity were noted.

Gross pathology:

Individual necropsy findings are given in Table 3.
No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Evaluation of Data

Data evaluations included the relationship, if any, between the exposure of the animal to the test item and the incidence and severity of all abnormalities including behavioural and clinical observations, gross lesions, bodyweight changes, mortality and any other toxicological effects.

Using the mortality data obtained, an estimate of the acute oral median lethal dose (LD₅₀) of the test item was made.

The results were evaluated according to EU labelling regulations Commission Directive 2001/59/EC for classification and labelling of dangerous substances andRegulation (EC) No 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, Packaging and Labelling of Dangerous Substances.

Table 1              Individual Clinical Observations and Mortality Data

Dose Level mg/kg	Animal Number and Sex	Effects Noted After Dosing (Hours)				Effects Noted During Period After Dosing (Days)
		½	1	2	4	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
2000	1-0 Female	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	1-1 Female	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	1-2 Female	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	2-0 Female	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	2-1 Female	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	2-2 Female	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

0=     No signs of systemic toxicity

Table 2              Individual Bodyweights and Weekly Bodyweight Changes

Dose Level mg/kg	Animal Number and Sex	Bodyweight (g) at Day			Bodyweight Gain (g) During Week
		0	7	14	1	2
2000	1-0 Female	171	197	215	26	18
	1-1 Female	169	186	208	17	22
	1-2 Female	171	194	210	23	16
	2-0 Female	158	178	186	20	8
	2-1 Female	161	180	191	19	11
	2-2 Female	161	187	197	26	10

Table 3              Individual Necropsy Findings

Dose Level mg/kg	Animal Number and Sex	Time of Death	Macroscopic Observations
2000	1-0 Female	Killed Day 14	No abnormalities detected
	1-1 Female	Killed Day 14	No abnormalities detected
	1-2 Female	Killed Day 14	No abnormalities detected
	2-0 Female	Killed Day 14	No abnormalities detected
	2-1 Female	Killed Day 14	No abnormalities detected
	2-2 Female	Killed Day 14	No abnormalities detected

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:

study cannot be used for classification

Remarks:

Migrated information

Conclusions:

The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2500 mg/kg bodyweight (Globally Harmonised Classification System - Unclassified).
The test item did not meet the criteria for classification according to the EU labelling regulations Commission Directive 2001/59/EC or the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, Packaging and Labelling of Dangerous Substances.

Executive summary:

Introduction.The study was performed to assess the acute oral toxicity of the test item following a single oral administration in the Wistar strain rat. The method was designed to be compatible with the following:

OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No.423 "Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method" (adopted 17 December 2001)

Method B1 tris Acute Toxicity (Oral) of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008

Method. A group of three fasted females was treated with the test item at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. This was followed by a further group of three fasted females at the same dose level.

The test item was administered orally as asolutionindistilled water. Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.

Mortality. There were no deaths.

Clinical Observations. There were no signs of systemic toxicity.

Bodyweight. All animals showed expected gains in bodyweight over the study period.

Necropsy. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.

Conclusion. The acute oral median lethal dose (LD₅₀) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be greater than 2500 mg/kg bodyweight (Globally Harmonised Classification System-Unclassified).

The test item did not meet the criteria for classification according to the EU labelling regulations Commission Directive 2001/59/EC or the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, Packaging and Labelling of Dangerous Substances.