Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
from 2010-12-06 to 2011-01-11 (experimental phase)
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
The study has been conducted according to the standard guideline(s) and its results are acceptable for assessment and classification. The study has not been conducted fully according to GLP. It was conducted in a facility operating to GLP within the UK national GLP monitoring programme and it was Quality Assurance audited to verify the integrity of the data and to ensure the report accurately reflects the data. The analytical characterisation of the test material has been performed according to GLP. As a consequence, the overall reliability rating (according to Klimisch et al.) is considered to be between "reliable without restrictions" and "reliable with restrictions", but closer to "reliable without restrictions". Thus an overall Klimisch rating of 1 (reliable without restrictions) has been assigned.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2011
Report date:
2011

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The study was based on the in vitro technique described by Ames and his co-workers and Garner et al in which mutagenic activity is assessed by exposing histidine and tryptophan auxotrophs of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli to various concentrations of a test item.
- The dose range for the main experiment was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay.
- In the main experiment, six strains were tested (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, WP2uvrApKM101, WP2pKM101
- Each bacterial strain was treated with each concentration of test item in triplicate both with and without S9-mix in Experiment I and with S9-mix only in Experiment II.
- The plate incorporation method was used for Experiment I and the preincubation method for Experiment II.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
Conducted in a facility operating to GLP within the UK national GLP monitoring programme. Audited by Quality Assurance to verify the integrity of the data and to ensure the report accurately reflects the data. Analysis of test item according to GLP.
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Reaction mass of (1R,4S,4aR,8R,8aS)-9-(dichloromethylidene)-8-hydroxyoctahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5(1H)-one and (1S,4R,4aS,8S,8aR)-9-(dichloromethylidene)-8-hydroxyoctahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5(1H)-one and (1R,4S,4aR,8S,8aS)-9-(dichloromethylidene)-8-hydroxyoctahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5(1H)-one and (1S,4R,4aS,8R,8aR)-9-(dichloromethylidene)-8-hydroxyoctahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5(1H)-one
EC Number:
700-770-4
Molecular formula:
C12H14Cl2O2
IUPAC Name:
Reaction mass of (1R,4S,4aR,8R,8aS)-9-(dichloromethylidene)-8-hydroxyoctahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5(1H)-one and (1S,4R,4aS,8S,8aR)-9-(dichloromethylidene)-8-hydroxyoctahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5(1H)-one and (1R,4S,4aR,8S,8aS)-9-(dichloromethylidene)-8-hydroxyoctahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5(1H)-one and (1S,4R,4aS,8R,8aR)-9-(dichloromethylidene)-8-hydroxyoctahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalen-5(1H)-one
Details on test material:
- Physical state: Light beige powder
- Stability under test conditions: not reported
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature in the dark

Method

Target gene:
Histidine locus of the genom of the bacterium for Salmonella typhimurium
Tryptophan locus of the genom of the bacterium for Escherichia coli
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: E. coli WP2 strain used: E. coli WP2 pKM101
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Preliminary toxicity test, with and without S9: 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate
Experiment I, without S9: 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate
Experiment I, with S9: 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate
Experiment II, with S9: 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle/solvent used: dimethyl sulphoxide (for vehicle controls, positive controls, test item formulation)
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: Without S9: N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (TA100, TA1535, WP2uvrA pKM101 , WP2pKM101), 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (TA98), 9-aminoacridine (TA1537). With S9: 2-aminoanthracene (TA100, TA1535, WP2uvrA pKM101 , WP2pKM101, TA1537), benzo(a)pyrene (TA98)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION:
Experiment I: in agar (plate incorporation)
Experiment II: preincubation

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 60 minutes (37°C, Experiment II only)
- Exposure duration: incubation at 37°C for approx. 48 hours

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY:
- Method (preliminary toxicity test):
concentrations tested: 0, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate;
after approx. 48 hours incubation at 37°C the plates were assessed for numbers of revertant colonies using a Domino colony counter and examined for effects on the growth of the bacterial background lawn. Manual counts were performed at 5000 μg/plate because of excessive test item precipitation.

MEASUREMENT OF FREQUENCY OF REVERTANT COLONIES:
by means of a Domino colony counter or (in case of excessive test item precipitation) by manual counts
Evaluation criteria:
A test item is considered as a mutagen if a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertants exceeding the threshold of twice the colony count of the corresponding solvent control is observed.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Mainly at the highest dose level(s). For details see "ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY" under "Additional information on results".
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Mainly at the highest dose level(s). For details see "ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY" under "Additional information on results".
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: A test item precipitate (fibrous in appearance) was noted at 5000 µg/plate in both experiments. This observation did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: Strain TA100 and WP2uvrApKM101 were treated with concentrations from 0 to 5000 µg/plate with and without metabilic activation. The results are presented in "Any other information on results incl. tables".

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
The test item was toxic to both of the strains of bacteria used (TA100 (presence and absence of S9-mix) and WP2uvrApKM101 (absence of S9-mix only)) at 5000 μg/plate (the test item formulation and S9-mix used in this experiment were both shown to be sterile).
In the first experiment (plate incorporation methodology) the test item caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the tester strains dosed in the absence of S9-mix at 5000 µg/plate. In the presence of S9-mix, weakened bacterial background lawns were noted for TA100, TA98 and TA1537 at 5000 µg/plate with substantial reductions in revertant colony frequency noted at the same dose level for TA1535, WP2uvrApKM101 and WP2pKM101. In the second experiment (pre-incubation methodology) the test item caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the Salmonella tester strains, initially from 1500 µg/plate (TA100) and at 5000 µg/plate (TA1535, TA98 and TA1537). There was no visible reduction in the viability of the bacterial background lawns of Escherichia coli strains WP2uvrApKM101 and WP2pKM101, however slight reductions in colony frequency were noted.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Increases in the frequency of revertant colonies

No toxicologically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, in excess of two‑fold greater than the concurrent solvent controls, were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, for any dose level of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation.

 

 

Preliminary Toxicity Test

The numbers of revertant colonies for the toxicity assay were:

With (+) or without (-)
S9-mix

Strain

Dose (µg/plate)

0

0.15

0.5

1.5

5

15

50

150

500

1500

5000

-

TA100

87

93

84

95

90

86

84

78

95

85

0 VP

+

TA100

102

106

113

120

102

121

122

103

113

87

0 VP

-

WP2uvrA
pKM101

140

155

158

154

135

134

144

151

134

137

85 SP

+

WP2uvrA
pKM101

173

166

161

201

173

170

177

180

188

184

130 P

S            Sparse bacterial background lawn

V            Very weak bacterial background lawn

P            Precipitate

 

 

Test Results: Experiment 1 – Without Metabolic Activation

Test Period

From: 13 December 2010

To: 16 December 2010

With or Without

S9-Mix

Test

substance

concentration

(µg/plate)

Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate)

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA
pKM101

WP2pKM101

TA98

TA1537

-

0

102

107

103

(104)

2.6#

26

20

27

(24)

3.8

203

197

198

(199)

3.2

81

81

99

(87)

10.4

22

22

23

(22)

0.6

11

7

16

(11)

4.5

-

15

82

90

96

(89)

7.0

0.9

20

27

20

(22)

4.0

0.9

177

206

197

(193)

14.8

1.0

103

92

97

(97)

5.5

1.1

15

15

18

(16)

1.7

0.7

12

14

12

(13)

1.2

1.2

-

50

101

101

93

(98)

4.6

0.9

15

26

20

(20)

5.5

0.8

195

214

189

(199)

13.1

1.0

85

113

81

(93)

17.4

1.1

24

20

16

(20)

4.0

0.9

14

12

15

(14)

1.5

1.3

-

150

98

89

106

(98)

8.5

0.9

26

26

23

(25)

1.7

1.0

186

188

201

(192)

8.1

1.0

89

101

82

(91)

9.6

1.0

19

18

20

(19)

1.0

0.9

11

11

11

(11)

0.0

1.0

-

500

86

92

96

(91)

5.0

0.9

29

24

24

(26)

2.9

1.1

200

179

198

(192)

11.6

1.0

81

81

78

(80)

1.7

0.9

21

16

21

(19)

2.9

0.9

14

15

11

(13)

2.1

1.2

-

1500

117

75

101

(98)

21.2

0.9

24

23

29

(25)

3.2

1.0

190

176

217

(194)

20.8

1.0

67

74

75

(72)

4.4

0.8

15

18

16

(16)

1.5

0.7

11

8

9

(9)

1.5

0.8

-

5000

69 SP

78 SP

81 SP

(76)

6.2

0.7

0 VP

0 VP

0 VP

(0)

0.0

0.0

126 SP

172 SP

77 SP

(125)

47.5

0.6

56 SP

31 SP

45 SP

(44)

12.5

0.5

0 VP

0 VP

0 VP

(0)

0.0

0.0

0 VP

0 VP

0 VP

(0)

0.0

0.0

Positive controls

Name

ENNG

ENNG

ENNG

ENNG

4NQO

9AA

S9-Mix

-

Concentration (μg/plate)

3

5

0.5

2

0.2

80

No. colonies per plate

449

346

454

(416)

61.0
4.0

1212

1052

1290

(1185)

121.3
49.4

1486

1709

1784

(1660)

155.0
8.3

1784

1597

1730

(1704)

96.2
19.6

140

150

157

(149)

8.5
6.8

2203

2882

2046

(2377)

444.3
216.1

ENNG   N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

4NQO   4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide

9AA     9-Aminoacridine

S           Sparse bacterial background lawn

V           Very weak bacterial background lawn

P           Precipitate

0.0        Fold increase over concurrent vehicle control

#        Standard deviation

 

 

Test Results: Experiment 1 – With Metabolic Activation

Test Period

From: 13 December 2010

To: 16 December 2010

With or Without
S9-Mix

Test

substance

concentration

(µg/plate)

Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate)

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA
pKM101

WP2pKM101

TA98

TA1537

+

0

103

91

99

(98)

6.1#

16

15

11

(14)

2.6

252

286

231

(256)

27.8

135

130

128

(131)

3.6

30

23

24

(26)

3.8

14

11

15

(13)

2.1

+

15

90

82

93

(88)

5.7

0.9

15

12

12

(13)

1.7

0.9

242

227

210

(226)

16.0

0.9

98

123

136

(119)

19.3

0.9

27

21

30

(26)

4.6

1.0

14

16

14

(15)

1.2

1.2

+

50

79

80

74

(78)

3.2

0.8

10

14

12

(12)

2.0

0.9

222

217

213

(217)

4.5

0.8

115

133

130

(126)

9.6

1.0

33

22

19

(25)

7.4

1.0

14

8

13

(12)

3.2

0.9

+

150

91

74

84

(83)

8.5

0.8

16

9

23

(16)

7.0

1.1

232

206

269

(236)

31.7

0.9

118

122

115

(118)

3.5

0.9

22

23

25

(23)

1.5

0.9

12

12

13

(12)

0.6

0.9

+

500

86

104

80

(90)

12.5

0.9

16

15

12

(14)

2.1

1.0

229

236

253

(239)

12.3

0.9

114

115

121

(117)

3.8

0.9

29

22

23

(25)

3.8

1.0

10

13

14

(12)

2.1

0.9

+

1500

95

86

99

(93)

6.7

0.9

3

8

3

(5)

2.9

0.4

199

199

224

(207)

14.4

0.8

93

97

117

(102)

12.9

0.8

22

25

21

(23)

2.1

0.9

12

7

8

(9)

2.6

0.7

+

5000

47 SP

65 SP

67 SP

(60)

11.0

0.6

0 P

0 P

0 P

(0)

0.0

0.0

196 P

179 P

157 P

(177)

19.6

0.7

68 P

67 P

64 P

(66)

2.1

0.5

0 VP

0 VP

0 VP

(0)

0.0

0.0

10 SP

10 SP

8 SP

(9)

1.2

0.7

Positive controls

Name

2AA

2AA

2AA

2AA

BP

2AA

S9-Mix

+

Concentration (μg/plate)

1

2

10

10

5

2

No. colonies per plate

574

668

548

(597)

63.1

6.1

120

147

165

(144)

22.7

10.3

2106

2191

2232

(2176)

64.3

8.5

500

435

472

(469)

32.6

3.6

361

308

299

(323)

33.5

12.4

122

122

122

(122)

0.0

9.4

BP         Benzo(a)pyrene

2AA     2-Aminoanthracene

S           Sparse bacterial background lawn

V           Very weak bacterial background lawn

P           Precipitate

0.0        Fold increase over concurrent vehicle control

#        Standard deviation

 

 

Test Results: Experiment 2 – With Metabolic Activation & Pre-Incubation

Remark: due to constraints of this IUCLID field it was not possible to include this table. The complete "Any other information on results incl. tables of endpoint study record" can be found in attachment DCHK-NBA_Ames_add_info.pdf.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

The test item was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.

This study has been initiated (study initiation date: 24 November 2010) for other purposes than to support a registration according to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH). It has not been carried out in compliance with the principles of good laboratory practice (GLP), which is, according to REACH Article 13 (4), required for toxicological tests. The study has been conducted according to the standard guideline(s). It was conducted in a facility operating to GLP within the UK national GLP monitoring programme and it was Quality Assurance audited to verify the integrity of the data and to ensure the report accurately reflects the data. The original data and the original final report are retained in the archives of the test facility. No formal claim of GLP compliance has been made for this study. The analytical characterisation of the test material has been performed according to GLP.
After assessing all information on this study, the registrant has concluded that the following conditions are met:
(1) adequacy for the purpose of classification and labelling and/or risk assessment;
(2) adequate and reliable coverage of the key parameters foreseen to be investigated in the corresponding test methods referred to in Article 13(3);
(3) exposure duration comparable to or longer than the corresponding test methods referred to in Article 13(3) if exposure duration is a relevant parameter; and
(4) adequate and reliable documentation of the study is provided.
Thus, according to REACH Annex XI, 1.1 ("Testing does not appear scientifically necessary - Use of existing data"), these existing data are considered to be acceptable for fulfilling the information requirements of this endpoint.

As a consequence, the overall reliability rating (according to Klimisch et al.) is considered to be between "reliable without restrictions" and "reliable with restrictions", but closer to "reliable without restrictions". Thus an overall Klimisch rating of 1 (reliable without restrictions) has been assigned.
Executive summary:

This study was designed to assess the mutagenic potential of test item using a bacterial/microsome test system. The study was based on the in vitro technique described by Ames.

The bacterial strains S. typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, E. coli WP2uvrApKM101 and WP2pKM101 were treated with the test item at up to seven dose levels in triplicate. In experiment I, the plate incorporation method was followed and cultures with and without S9 mix were tested. In experiment II, the preincubation method was followed and only cultures with S9 mix were tested. The solvent, untreated and positive controls were also tested in triplicate.

The sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated by the results obtained for the solvent and positive controls.

In the first experiment (plate incorporation methodology) the test item caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the tester strains dosed in the absence of S9-mix at 5000 µg/plate. In the presence of S9-mix, weakened bacterial background lawns were noted for TA100, TA98 and TA1537 at 5000 µg/plate with substantial reductions in revertant colony frequency noted at the same dose level for TA1535, WP2uvrApKM101 and WP2pKM101. In the second experiment (pre-incubation methodology) the test item caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the Salmonella tester strains, initially from 1500 µg/plate (TA100) and at 5000 µg/plate (TA1535, TA98 and TA1537). There was no visible reduction in the viability of the bacterial background lawns of Escherichia coli strains WP2uvrApKM101 and WP2pKM101, however slight reductions in colony frequency were noted. The test item was tested up to the maximum recommended dose level (5000 µg/plate). A test item precipitate (fibrous in appearance) was noted at 5000 µg/plate in both experiments. This observation did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.

No toxicologically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, in excess of two‑fold greater than the concurrent solvent controls, were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, for any dose level of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation.

In conclusion, the test item was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.