Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
01/2008 to 04/2008
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2008
Report date:
2008

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Test report was already available.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Bromo(hexahydro-2H-azepin-2-onato-N)magnesium
EC Number:
241-158-2
EC Name:
Bromo(hexahydro-2H-azepin-2-onato-N)magnesium
Cas Number:
17091-31-5
Molecular formula:
C6H10BrMgNO
IUPAC Name:
magnesium(2+) ion 2-oxoazepan-1-ide bromide
additive 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
ε-caprolactam
EC Number:
203-313-2
EC Name:
ε-caprolactam
Cas Number:
105-60-2
Molecular formula:
C6H11NO
IUPAC Name:
azepan-2-one
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: 07072601
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 26.07.2008

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature

TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: no

FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST (if different from that of starting material): powder

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (F-69592 L' Arbresle)
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: not specified
- Age at study initiation: 4 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 240 to 258 g
- Housing: groups of 2 or 3 animals, in polycarbonate containers
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 to 22
- Humidity (%): 36 to 58
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
8.75%
Day(s)/duration:
20
Adequacy of induction:
highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
Challenge
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
20% and 40%
Day(s)/duration:
1
Adequacy of challenge:
highest non-irritant concentration
No. of animals per dose:
10 treated animals
5 control animals
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Determination by intradermal injection of the Maximal Non Necrotizing Concentration (MNNC)
Determination by topical application of the Pre-Maximal Non Irritant Concentration (PreMNIC)
Determination by topical application of the Maximal Non Irritant Concentration (MNIC)

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3x2
- Test groups: 1 (10 animals)
- Control group: 1 (5 animals
- Site: scapular zone

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1x2
- Day(s) of challenge: 1
- Exposure period: 1
- Test groups: 1 (15 animals)
- Control group: 0
- Site: dorso-lumbar zone
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48
Positive control substance(s):
yes

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
40%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
No cutaneous intolerance reaction
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
40%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
No cutaneous intolerance reaction
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
No cutaneous intolerance reaction
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
No cutaneous intolerance reaction
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
40%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
No macroscopic cutaneous reactions attributable to allergy
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
40%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
No macroscopic cutaneous reactions attributable to allergy
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
No macroscopic cutaneous reactions attributable to allergy
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
No macroscopic cutaneous reactions attributable to allergy

Any other information on results incl. tables

No macroscopic cutaneous reactions attributable to allergy were recorded during the examination following the removal of the occlusive dressing (challenge phase) from the animals of the treated group with the test item.

No cutaneous intolerance reaction was recorded in animals from the negative control group.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In view of the results, under these experimental conditions, the test item Bromo(hexahydro-2Hazepin-2-onato-N)magnesium needs not to be classified, in accordance with the criteria for classification of regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 needs not to be classified.