Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 19 november to 14 December 1991
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: According to the EEC Method B.6, Part B and it is GLP.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1992
Report date:
1992

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Ethyl 2-cyclohexylpropionate
EC Number:
412-280-5
EC Name:
Ethyl 2-cyclohexylpropionate
Cas Number:
2511-00-4
Molecular formula:
C11H20O2
IUPAC Name:
ethyl 2-cyclohexylpropanoate
Details on test material:
- Physical state: clear liquid
- Storage condition of test material: 4ºC in the dark

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dutch
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: D.Hall, Newchurch, Staffordshire, England
- Age at study initiation: 6-7 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 299-358g
- Housing: in group of 10 in suspended metal cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 19 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
coconut oil
Concentration / amount:
Table 4 and 5
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
other: topical induction
Vehicle:
coconut oil
Concentration / amount:
Table 4 and 5
No. of animals per dose:
30
Details on study design:
POSITIVE CONTROL
-Results in table 6
TREATMENT PROCEDURE
Preliminary study
- Results in table 4
Induction:
- Intradermal injection: 20% v/v in Alembicol D
- Topical application: As supplied
This was the maximum practical concentration and did not give rise to irritating effects
CHALLENGE
Topical applications: as supplied
From preliminary investigations the test substance, as supplied was the maximum practical concentration and did not give rise to irritating effects.
Main study: the procedure may be considered in two parts, induction and challenge.
INDUCTION
Injectables for the test animals were prepared as follows:
1. Freund's complete adjuvant* was diluted with an equal volume of water for irrigation (Ph.eur.)
2. The test substance, 20% v/v in Alembicol D.
3. The test substance, 20% v/v in a 50:50 mixture of Freund's complete adjuvant and Alembicol D.
Control animals: Table 1
CHALLENGE
The control and test animals were challenge topically two weeks after the topical induction applications using the test substance, as supplied and 50% v/v in Alembicol D.

Positive control substance(s):
yes

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Health status:
No signs of ill health or toxic were recorded
Induction:
Dermal reactions seen following the induction applications are summarised in Table 1:
Intradermal injections:
Necrosis was recorded at sites receiving Freund's Complete Adjuvant in test and control animals.
Irritation was seen in test animals at sites receiving the test substance, 20% v/v in Alembicol D. Very slight irritation was observed in control animals.
Topical applications:
Moderate erythema was observed in test animals following topical application with the test subtance, as supplied.
Similar signs of irritation were seen in the controls.
Challenge:
The numerical values given to the dermal reactions elicited by the challenge application are shown in Table 2.
The dermal response seen in test and control animals was similar.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1
Dermal reactions observed after each induction
Site Intradermal injection Topical applications
Test animals Control animals Test animals Control animals
1 Necrosis Necrosis Moderate erythema Moderate erythema
2 Irritation Necrosis    
3 Necrosis Necrosis    

Table 2
Dermal reactions observed after the challenge application with the test substance
Guinea-pig number E=Erythema
O=Oedema
Score Results
Positive (+)
Negative (-)
Inconclusive (±)
24 hours 48 hours 72 hours
A P A P A P
4900 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4901 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4902 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4903 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4904 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4905 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4906 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4907 E 0 0 0 0 0* 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4908 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4909 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4910 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4911 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4912 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4913 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4914 E 0* 0 0* 0 0* 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4915 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4916 E 0* 0 0* 0 0* 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4917 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4918 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4919 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4920 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4921 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4922 E 0* 0 0* 0 0* 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4923 E 0 0 0 0 0* 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4924 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4925 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4926 E 0 0 0 0 0* 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4927 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4928 E 0 0 0 0 0* 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
4929 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -

*: Dryness and sloughing of the epidermis
a: Anterior site, exposed to the test substance, as supplied
P: Posterior site, exposed to the test substance, 50% v/v in Alembicol D

Table 3
Group  Guinea-pig number At start of study 19.11.91 at finish of study
Control 4900 475 632
4901 548 655
4902 484 689
4903 472 592
4904 458 603
4905 510 642
4906 468 644
4907 503 698
4908 487 610
4909 487 621
Test 4910 446 552
4911 424 553
4912 443 570
4913 435 562
4914 401 534
4915 451 627
4916 456 604
4917 480 649
4918 453 597
4919 423 585
4920 442 574
4921 454 603
4922 502 609
4923 429 571
4924 469 626
4925 454 614
4926 453 594
4927 464 666
4928 458 586
4929 474 594

Table 4
Results of preliminary investigations with the test substance
Intradermal injections
Vehicle: Alembicol D
Guinea-pig number Concentration % v/v Score
Hours 24 72
471 30 D 10 10
E SN SN
O 2 2
20 D 8 8
E 2 2
O 2 1
454 10 D 10 10
E 2 2
O 2 2
7,5 D 10 10
E 2 2
O 2 2
5 D 8 8
E 2 2
O 2 2
2,5 D 8 8
E 2 2
O 2 2
1 D 8 8
E 2 2
O 2 2
0,5 D 6 6
E 2 2
O 2 2
Vehicle control D 3 3
E 1 1
O 1 1
468 30 D 10 10
E SN N
O 2 2
20 D 8 8
E 2 2
O 2 2
456 10 D 10 10
E 2 2
O 2 2
7,5 D 10 10
E 2 2
O 2 2
5 D 8 8
E 2 2
O 2 2
2,5 D 8 8
E 2 2
O 2 2
1 D 8 8
E 2 2
O 2 2
0,5 D 6 6
E 2 2
O 2 2
Vehicle control D 3 3
E 1 1
O 1 1
D: Diameter (mm)
E: Erythema (0-4 numerical scores)
O:Oedema (0-4 numerical scores)
N: Necrosis
SN: Slight necrosis

Table 5
Topical appliaction
Vehicle: Alembicol D
Guinea-pig number Concentration % v/v Score
0 Hours 24 Hours 48 Hours
E O E O E O
450 As supplied 0 0 0 0 0 0
75 0 0 0 0 0 0
60 0 0 0 0 0 0
50 0 0 0 0 0 0
451 As supplied 0 0 0 0 0 0
75 0 0 0 0 0 0
60 0 0 0 0 0 0
50 0 0 0 0 0 0
448 As supplied 0 0 0 0 0 0
75 0 0 0 0 0 0
60 0 0 0 0 0 0
50 0 0 0 0 0 0
455 As supplied 0 0 0 0 0 0
75 0 0 0 0 0 0
60 0 0 0 0 0 0
50 0 0 0 0 0 0
E: Erythem (0-4 numerical scores)
O: Oedema (0-4 numerical scores)

Table 6
Summary of positive control data Magnusson and Kligman test using formalin
M&K R&D No. Numerical of female animals Dates of study Dates of study of receipt of Formalin Dose Levels % (aqueous dilutions) Results
Induction Challenge Positive Inconclusive Negative
Test Control Start Finish Intradermal Topical
20 20 20 06.01.86 03.02.86 11.12.85 0,05 10 5 and 2,5 10/20 7/20 3/20
21 20 20 07.04.86 02.05.86 11.12.85 0,1 10 5 and 1 17/20 2/20 1/20
22 20 10 09.06.86 04.07.86 11.12.85 0,1 10 5 and 1 19/19* 0/19* 0/19*
23 10 10 16.02.87 13.03.87 09.12.86 0,1 10 5 and 1 10/10 0/10 0/10
24 10 10 23.03.87 17.04.87 09.12.86 0,1 10 5 and 1 10/10 0/10 0/10
25 10 10 30.06.87 25.07.87 09.12.86 0,1 10 5 and 1 8/10 0/10 2/10
26 10 10 18.01.88 12.02.88 05.08.87 0,1 10 5 and 1 10/10 0/10 0/10
27 10 10 21.07.88 15.08.88 13.05.88 0,1 10 5 and 1 10/10 0/10 0/10
28 10 10 10.01.89 04.02.89 16.12.88 0,1 10 5 and 1 10/10 0/10 0/10
29 10 10 17.07.89 11.08.89 15.05.89 0,1 10 5 and 1 10/10 0/10 0/10
30 I 10 10 31.10.89 25.11.89 15.05.89 0,1 10 5 and 1 10/10 0/10 0/10
31 10 10 16.01.90 10.02.90 29.11.89 0,1 10 5 and 1 10/10 0/10 0/10
32 10 10 23.07.90 24.08.90 04.07.90 0,05 5 3 and 1,5
5 and 3***
5/10
10/10
0/10
0/10
5/10
0/10
33 10 10 30.10.90 24.11.90 04.07.90 0,1 10 5 and 1 10/10 0/10 0/10
34 10 10 15.01.91 09.01.91 09.01.91 0,1 10 5 and 1 8/10 1/10 1/10
35 10 10 06.03.91 31.03.91 09.01.91 0,1 10 5 and 1 10/10 0/10 0/10
36 10 10 12.03.91 06.04.91 09.01.91 0,1 10 5 and 1 10/10 0/10 0/10
37 10 10 15.08.91 09.09.91 19.06.91 0,1 10 5 and 1 10/10 0/10 0/10

I Animals supplied by Interfauna, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, England

All other animals supplied by D.Hall, Newchurch, Staffordshire, England

(Fromain obtained from Savory and Moore, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, England or from 1991, supplied by Thornton and Ross, Hunddersfield, England)

* One animal excluded due to poor health status

** Second challenge

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
In this tes, performed in twenty albino guinea-pigs of the test substance did not produce evidence of skin sensitisation (delayed contact hypersensitivity).
Executive summary:

The study was performed to assess the skin sensitisation potential of the test substance in the guinea-pig. The method followed was that described in the EEC Methods for the determianation of toxicity, Directive 84/449/EEC Part B, Method B.6. Acute toxicity (skin sensitization).

Based on the results of a preliminary study and in compliance with the guideline, the following dose levels were selected:

- Intradermal injection: 20% v/v in Alembicol D.

- Topical application: as supplied.

- Challenge application: as supplied and 50% v/v in Alembicol D.

Twenty test and ten conrol guinea-pigs were used in this study.

The test substance did not produce evidence of skin sensitisation (delayed contact hypersensitivity).

The test substance does not require labelling with the risk pharse R43 "May cause sensitization" by skin contact" in accordance with Council Directive 79/831/EEC Annex V1, Part II (D) as described in Commission Directive 91/325/EEC.