Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline-study performed under QAU and GLP (study was performed with just one animal, although the substance seems not to be corrosive)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1989
Report date:
1989

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
(study was performed with just one animal, although the substance seems not to be corrosive)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
not applicable
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
[29H,31H-phthalocyaninato(2-)-N29,N30,N31,N32]zinc
EC Number:
238-262-5
EC Name:
[29H,31H-phthalocyaninato(2-)-N29,N30,N31,N32]zinc
Cas Number:
14320-04-8
Molecular formula:
C32 H16 N8 Zn
Details on test material:
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity: 96.8%
- Batch No.: Partie 77.86

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: BRL, Biological Research Laboratories Ltd., Wolferstrasse 4, CH-4414 Füllinsdorf
- Age at study initiation: 14 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.6 kg
- Housing: singly
- Diet (ad libitum): Kliba 341
- Water (ad libitum): tap water
- Acclimation period: 4 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 +/- 3
- Humidity (%): 40-70
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: the untreated eye of the animal
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Single treatment
Observation period (in vivo):
72 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
1 male rabbit
Details on study design:
The test article was placed in the conjunctival sac of the left eye of the animal after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lid was then gently held together for about one second to prevent loss of the test article. The right eye remained untreated and served as the reference control.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): not done

SCORING SYSTEM: according to OECD Guidline 405

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: slit lamp

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 24-48-72 hours post treatment
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: no effects observed
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 24-48-72 hours post treatment
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
other: no effects observed
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 24-48-72 hours post treatment
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
other: no effects observed
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 24-48-72 hours post treatment
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: no effects observed
Other effects:
In the area of application a blue staining of the conjunctivae and eyelashes by pigment or coloring of the test article was observed during the entire observation period.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information