Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2018-12-04
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Version / remarks:
2017
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
In the test item treated group, one cornea out of three was excluded from measurement as it was punctured. As other two measurements showed comparable results, this deviation had no influence on the study results.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Lithium [ethanedioato-O,O’]tetrafluorophosphate
EC Number:
826-676-4
Cas Number:
521065-36-1
Molecular formula:
LiPF4C2O4
IUPAC Name:
Lithium [ethanedioato-O,O’]tetrafluorophosphate
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Batch No.: 180410
Purity: 99%

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
cattle
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: Vitelco, -'s Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
- Transport: Eyes were collected and transported in physiological saline in a suitable container under cooled conditions.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): not specified
Duration of treatment / exposure:
240 ± 10 minutes
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 (1 was excluded from measurement)
Details on study design:
SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS
The isolated corneas were stored in a petri dish with cMEM (Earle’s Minimum Essential Medium (Life Technologies, Bleiswijk, The Netherlands) containing 1% (v/v) L-glutamine (Life Technologies) and 1% (v/v) Fetal Bovine Serum (Life Technologies)). The isolated corneas were mounted in a corneal holder (one cornea per holder) of BASF (Ludwigshafen, Germany) with the endothelial side against the O-ring of the posterior half of the holder. The anterior half of the holder was positioned on top of the cornea and tightened with screws. The compartments of the corneal holder were filled with cMEM of 32 ± 1°C. The corneas were incubated for the minimum of 1 hour at 32 ± 1°C.

QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS
The eyes were checked for unacceptable defects, such as opacity, scratches, pigmentation and neovascularization by removing them from the physiological saline and holding them in the light. Those exhibiting defects were discarded.

NUMBER OF REPLICATES : 3 each for negative, positive control and test item

NEGATIVE CONTROL USED : physiological saline

POSITIVE CONTROL USED : 20% (w/v) Imidazole solution

APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME
The medium from the anterior compartment was removed and 750 μL of the negative control and 20% (w/v) Imidazole solution (positive control) were introduced onto the epithelium of the cornea. The test item was weighed in a bottle and applied directly on the corneas in such a way that the cornea was completely covered. The holder was slightly rotated, with the corneas maintained in a horizontal position, to ensure uniform distribution of the solutions over the entire cornea. Corneas were incubated in a horizontal position for 240 ± 10 minutes at 32 ± 1°C.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: After the incubation the solutions and the test compound were removed and the epithelium was washed at least three times with MEM with phenol red (Earle’s Minimum Essential Medium Life Technologies).

METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: The opacity of a cornea was measured by the diminution of light passing through the cornea.
- Corneal permeability: passage of sodium fluorescein dye measured with the aid of microtiter plate reader (OD490)
- Others: Possible pHeffects of the test item on the corneas were recorded. Each cornea was inspected visually for dissimilar opacity patterns.

SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)

DECISION CRITERIA: The decision criteria as indicated in the TG was used.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Value:
180
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Other effects / acceptance of results:
OTHER EFFECTS:
The corneas treated with the test item showed opacity values ranging from 168 to 191 and permeability values ranging from 0.020 to 0.076. The corneas were turbid after the 240 minutes of treatment with the test item. A pH effect of the test item was observed on the rinsing medium, the corneas were rinsed until no colour change of the medium was observed. Hence, the in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 169 to 192 after 240 minutes of treatment with test item.

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: The negative control responses for opacity and permeability were less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range indicating that the negative control did not induce irritancy on the corneas.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: The mean in vitro irritancy score of the positive control (20% (w/v) Imidazole) was 124 and within two standard deviations of the current historical positive control mean.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
In conclusion, since test item induced an IVIS > 55 (actual: 180), it is concluded that test item induces serious eye damage in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test under the experimental conditions described in this report.
Executive summary:

The eye hazard potential of test item as measured by its ability to induce opacity and increase permeability in an isolated bovine cornea was assessed using the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test (BCOP test) based on the most recent OECD guideline 437.

The eye damage of test item was tested through topical application to isolated bovine corneas for approximately 240 minutes.

The test item induced mainly serious opacity eye damage, resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of 180 after 4 hours of treatment. In conclusion, since test item induced an IVIS > 55, it is concluded that test item induces serious eye damage in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test under the experimental conditions described in this report.