Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
1. SOFTWARE: VEGA (version 1.1.3)

2. MODEL (incl. version number): Mutagenicity (Ames test) CONSENSUS model 1.0.1

3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
O=C(Nc1ccc(O)cc1)c2ccccc2(O)

For SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL, APPLICABILITY DOMAIN and ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT please see the attached document "Mutagenicity Consensus Guide" in the field "Attached justification" where the QMRF is explained.
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
(Q)SAR model reporting (QMRF)

Data source

Reference
Title:
VEGA version 1.1.3
Year:
2016
Bibliographic source:
Mutagenicity (Ames test) CONSENSUS model 1.0.1

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Guideline:
other: Mutagenicity (Ames test) CONSENSUS model 1.0.1
Type of assay:
other: QSAR prediction

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Osalmid
EC Number:
208-385-9
EC Name:
Osalmid
Cas Number:
526-18-1
Molecular formula:
C13H11NO3
IUPAC Name:
2-hydroxy-N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)benzamide
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
White or off-white crystalline powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SMILES : O=C(Nc1ccc(O)cc1)c2ccccc2(O)

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
not specified
Additional information on results:
Prediction is NON-Mutagenic with a consensus score of 0.15, based on 4 models.
Remarks on result:
no mutagenic potential (based on QSAR/QSPR prediction)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Prediction is NON-Mutagenic with a consensus score of 0.15 (low reliability), based on 4 models.