Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Effects on fertility

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
RA study
Justification for type of information:
Refer to the section 13 of IUCLID dataset for details on the read across justification. The combined repeat dose-reproductive developmental screening toxicity study with the read across substance is considered sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES JAPAN, INC. Atsugi breeding center
- Age at study initiation: (P) 10 wks- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: 330.8-420.4 g; Females: 207.2-245.0 g
- Housing: 2 animals per cage at mating
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum- Acclimation period: 14 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.0-25.0
- Humidity (%): 40.0-75.0
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs. dark/12 hrs light
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on mating procedure:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1/1- Length of cohabitation: up to 2 weeks- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug and/or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as Day 0 of pregnancy
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
Concentration of test substance was analyzed by GC method (mean content 107-110%)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
42 days for males and 42-54 days for females
Frequency of treatment:
Once daily
Dose / conc.:
100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Dose / conc.:
300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
12 animals (5 animals for satelite groups)
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Positive control:
Not applicable
Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily during breeding period and recovery period, twice daily during dosing

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes- Time schedule: once a week

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: for males weekly and at necropsy, for females weekly during dosing and on Days 0, 7, 14 and 20 of gestation and on Days 0 and 4 of lactation and at necropsy
Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
Mean time of estrous cycle and incidence of animals with estrous cycle other than a 4 day cycle per dose was determined beginning at the start of dosing until confirmation of mating.
Sperm parameters (parental animals):
Not applicable
Litter observations:
Number of (live) pups and sex ratio on Days 0 and 4.
Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
SACRIFICE- Male animals: Animals were sacrificed 43 days after satrting dosing or 16 days after starting recovery period. - Maternal animals: Animals were sacrificed 15 days after starting lactation. Animals that did not deliver were saclificed 26 days after pregnancy. For satelite group, sacrifice was done 15 days after starting recovery period.
Postmortem examinations (offspring):
Not applicable
Statistics:
Fisher’s exact test (significance level: 5%) was performed on the function test results, on the incidence of animals showing changes in estrous cycle, on the copulation rate, on the impregnation rate and on the incidence of morphological abnormalities in the offspring.Among the histopathological findings in the test substance treatment groups, the graded data was tested for significance in relation to the control group using Mann-Whitney U-testing (significance level: 5%), while the total values for positive grades were tested for significance with the control group using Fisher’s exact one-sided testing (significance level: 5%).For the other data, the values obtained for each individual or the mean values for each litter were used as single samples, and these samples were compared with the values within the satellite group or within the other groups. Where two groups were used in the analysis, F-testing was performed first, followed by Student t-testing if no significant differences were observed. If a significant difference was observed in the F-testing, Aspin-Welch testing was performed. When three or more groups were used in the analysis, the Bartlett method was used first in order to test for uniformity of variance in each group (significance level: 5%).If the variance was uniform, one-way analysis of variance (significance level: 5%) was performed. If a significant difference was observed between groups, the Dunnett method was used to perform a multiple comparison (significance level: 5%). On the other hand, if the variance in any of the groups was 0 and if the variance was not uniform, Kruskal-Wallis rank testing (significance level: 5%) was performed. If a significant difference was observed between groups, the Dunnett testing method was used to perform a multiple comparison (significance level: 5%).
Reproductive indices:
Copulation index, Fertility index, Gestation index, Imlantation index, Delivery index.
Offspring viability indices:
Birth index, Live birth index, Viability index.
Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Other effects:
no effects observed
Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Estrous cycle: no treatment related effect on incidence and length of estrous cycle
Reproductive function: sperm measures:
not examined
Reproductive performance:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Reproductive performance: No significant differences were observed between the control group and any of the treatment groups in impregnation rate, number of days to copulation or number of estrous during this period. No significant differences were observed for corpus luteum count, implantation count or implantation rate between control and treated groups.

Systemic toxicity details for parental animals are described at 7.5.1 Repeated dose toxicity: oral section.
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: There were no effects related to test substance treatment.
Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Mortality / viability:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Sexual maturation:
no effects observed
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not examined
Gross pathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings:
not examined
No effect on birth index, live birth index, viability index or sex ratio was observed. Morphological observations on Day 0 of lactation showed a kinked tail in one pup at 1000 mg/kg bw/d. As no tail abnormalities were observed in any of the other animals, this was considered to be a spontaneous malformation. At necropsy no tail abnormalities were found (not clear if pup with kinked tail had died or not).
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Generation:
F1
Effect level:
>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: There were no effects related to test substance treatment.
Key result
Reproductive effects observed:
no
Conclusions:
Under the study conditions, the NOAEL for fertility and fetal toxicity of the substance in rats was determined to be greater than 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to determine the repeated dose toxicity of the read-across substance CAS 7299 -99 -2 in rats according to OECD Guideline 422, in compliance with GLP. A combined repeated dose-reproductive developmental screening study was conducted in rats in which the test substance was administered to groups of 12 animals per sex through oral gavage at dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day for 42 days (males) or 42 -54 days (for females). Males and females were co-habited in 1:1 ratio in the cages during the dosing period for a period of 2 weeks till there is proof of pregnancy. Mortality, clinical signs, food consumption and body weight measurements were performed on a regular basis during the dosing period. After the scheduled necropsy of the pregnant females, reproductive and fetal developmental parameters were examined. Apart from few non-treatment related effects, no adverse effects were observed in any of the treated groups. Under the study conditions, the NOAEL for fertility and fetal toxicity of the substance in rats was determined to be greater than 1000 mg/kg bw/day (MHLW, 2005).

Effect on fertility: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subacute
Species:
rat
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Effects on developmental toxicity

Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Toxicity to reproduction: other studies

Additional information

A study was conducted to determine the repeated dose toxicity of the read-across substance CAS 7299 -99 -2 in rats according to OECD Guideline 422, in compliance with GLP. A combined repeated dose-reproductive developmental screening study was conducted in rats in which the test substance was administered to groups of 12 animals per sex through oral gavage at dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day for 42 days (males) or 42 -54 days (for females). Males and females were co-habited in 1:1 ratio in the cages during the dosing period for a period of 2 weeks till there is proof of pregnancy.Mortality, clinical signs, food consumption and body weight measurements were performed on a regular basis during the dosing period. After the scheduled necropsy of the pregnant females, reproductive and fetal developmental parameters were examined. Apart from few non-treatment related effects, no adverse effects were observed in any of the treated groups. Under the study conditions, the NOAEL for fertility and fetal toxicity of the substance in rats was determined to be greater than 1000 mg/kg bw/day (MHLW, 2005).

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the combined repeat dose-reproductive-developmental screening toxicity study with the read-across substance CAS 7299 -99 -2, no classification is warranted according to EU CLP (EC 1272/2008) criteria.

Additional information