Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Ecotoxicological Summary

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Hazard for aquatic organisms

Freshwater

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Marine water

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

STP

Hazard assessment conclusion:
PNEC STP
PNEC value:
1.4 mg/L
Assessment factor:
10
Extrapolation method:
assessment factor

Sediment (freshwater)

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Sediment (marine water)

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Hazard for air

Air

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Hazard for terrestrial organisms

Soil

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Hazard for predators

Secondary poisoning

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no potential for bioaccumulation

Additional information

Conclusion on classification

In the absence of adequate aquatic chronic toxicity information from all three trophic levels, the classification was based on short-term aquatic toxicity values (72-h NOELR = 100 mg/L in algae, 48-h NOELR = 100 mg/L in daphnids, 96-h NOEC = 1,000 mg/L in fish). Based on the results of these three tests conducted on an analogue substance, no toxicity was observed in any of the three trophic levels; furthermore,there is no evidence that the acute toxicity tests do not provide a true measure of the intrinsic toxicity of the substance. The substance was shown to be readily biodegradable (i.e., 80% degradation in 28 d, meeting the 10-day window) and therefore is not expected to be persistent in the environment. The substance is composed of a methyl ester of a fatty acid, and is expected to be rapidly metabolised in vertebrates, indicating that the potential for bioaccumulation may be much lower than that predicted by the partition coefficient (log Kow = 6.69).  Therefore, although both the predicted bioconcentration factor (BCF = 511 L/kg w.w.) and the predicted octanol-water partition coefficient (log Kow = 6.69) are above the thresholds for possible environmental classification (BCF≥ 500 and log Kow ≥ 4, respectively), food chain exposures and bioaccumulation of the substance are not of concern due to the non-persistence of the substance in the environment. In summary, there is no evidence that the acute toxicity tests do not provide a true measure of the intrinsic toxicity of the substance, which is not expected to be persistent or bioaccumulative in the environment. Therefore, the substance was not assigned a Category Chronic 4 classification and was not otherwise classified with respect to the aquatic environment.