Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-762-8 | CAS number: 540-97-6
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- January to March 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane
- EC Number:
- 208-762-8
- EC Name:
- Dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane
- Cas Number:
- 540-97-6
- Molecular formula:
- C12H36O6Si6
- IUPAC Name:
- dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: RccHan:WIST
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories B.V., The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: approximately 10 to 14 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: not stated
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: individually in Macrolon plastic cages (MIII type)
- Diet (ad libitum): SM R/M-Z (SSNIFF Spezialdiaten GmbH, Germany)
- Water (ad libitum): tap water
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 to 24
- Humidity (%): 40 to 70
- Air changes (per hr): at least 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 16 February 2015 To: 12 March 2015
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: dosed undiluted
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- No chemical analysis was performed because the test substance was dosed undiluted.(i.e. without the use of a vehicle).
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: mated at supplier
- M/F ratio per cage: not stated
- Length of cohabitation: not stated
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 6 to Day 20 post-cotum, inclusive
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Duration of test:
- Day 0 to Day 21 post-coitum
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Group 1
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Group 2
- Dose / conc.:
- 330 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Group 3
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Group 4
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 22 Females
- Control animals:
- other: yes, water
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Dose levels were selected based on results of the dose range finding study (Project 507522) in which no remarkable findings were noted at doses of 0, 100, 330 or 1000 mg/kg/day.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: at least twice daily.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Days 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21 post-coitum
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Days 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21 post-coitum
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
WATER CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Subjective appraisal was maintained during the study, but no quantitative investigation was introduced as no treatment related effect was suspected.
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 21
- Organs examined: macroscopic examination, liver weighed and retained - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Other: In case implantations were not macroscopically visible, the uterus was stained using the Salewski technique - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Head examinations: Yes: half per litter - Statistics:
- The following statistical methods were used to analyze the data:
- If the variables could be assumed to follow a normal distribution, the Dunnett-test based on a pooled variance estimate was applied for the comparison of the treated groups and the control group. The mean of fetal weights per litter and mean of total litter weight was also analyzed using this method.
- The Steel-test was applied if the data could not be assumed to follow a normal distribution.
- The Fisher Exact-test was applied to frequency data.
- The Mann Whitney test was used to compare mean litter proportions (percent of litter) of the number of viable and dead fetuses, early and late resorptions, total resorptions, pre- and postimplantation loss, and sex distribution.
- Mean litter proportions (percent per litter) of total fetal malformations and developmental variations (external, visceral and skeletal), and each particular external, visceral and skeletal malformation or variation were subjected to the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric ANOVA test to determine intergroup differences. If the ANOVA revealed statistically significant (p<0.05) intergroup variance, Dunn’s test was used to compare the compound-treated groups to the control group.
All tests were two-sided and in all cases p<0.05 was accepted as the lowest level of significance. Group means were calculated for continuous data and medians were calculated for discrete data (scores) in the summary tables. Test statistics were calculated on the basis of exact values for means and pooled variances.
No statistics were applied for data on maternal survival, pregnancy status, group mean numbers of dead fetuses, early and late resorptions, and pre- and post-implantation loss. - Indices:
- Pre-implantation loss (%) = ((number of corpora lutea - number of implantation sites) / number of corpora lutea) x 100
Post-implantation loss (%) = ((number of implantation sites - number of live fetuses) / number of implantation sites) x 100
The fetal developmental findings were summarized by: 1) presenting the incidence of a given finding both as the number of fetuses and the number of litters available for examination in the group; and 2) considering the litter as the basic unit for comparison, calculating the number of affected fetuses as a mean litter proportion on a total group basis, where:
Viable fetuses affected/litter (%) = (number of viable fetuses affected per litter / number of viable fetuses per litter) x 100
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 1000 mg/kg/day bw, maternal animals had higher absolute and relative liver weights. The difference from controls was slight but statistically significant. There were no test item-related microscopic findings observed during the histopathological evaluation therefore, the increases in liver weights were not considered toxicologically relevant.
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- not specified
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- not specified
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- not specified
- Early or late resorptions:
- not specified
- Dead fetuses:
- not specified
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not specified
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not examined
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Maternal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- not specified
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not specified
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Based on the initial description of findings (severely malaligned sternebrae, fused sternebrae, vertebral centra anomaly and bent limb bones), an external peer review was performed which concluded that there were no toxicologically relevant effects on skeletal morphology following treatment up to 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Skeletal malformations only occurred in two fetuses only. At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, 1 fetus had a short rib and since this occurred once only and was seen previously in historical control fetuses, it was considered to not be test substance related. The other malformation was noted in a control fetus with polydactyly (not detected externally) and as such was not considered related to treatment.
Skeletal variations occurred for 33.5%, 31.6%, 38.7% and 50.4% of the fetuses per litter in the control, 100, 330 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day groups, respectively.
Animals at 1000 mg/kg bw/day had a significantly higher percent of combined skeletal variations per litter than controls. None of the individual findings was significantly higher for animals at 1000 mg/kg bw/day though findings like (slight or moderate) malaligned sternebra(e), 14th rudimentary rib(s), caudal shift of the pelvic girdle, unossified metacarpal(s) and/or metatarsal(s), and sternebra(e) #1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and/or #6 unossified were seen at slightly higher incidences than controls. Taken together, these culminated in a statistically significant increase in skeletal variations overall, but was not regarded toxicologically relevant.
Fetuses at 1000 mg/kg bw/day (and at 330 mg/kg bw/day) had a higher incidence of slightly to moderately malaligned sternebra(e) (12.5% and 10.7%, respectively versus control value 8.4% per litter). Besides, three fetuses at the high dose level showed severe malaligned sternebra(e) (0.0% for controls versus 1.2% at 1000 mg/kg bw/d). However, the difference of both severities of malaligned sternebrae from controls was not statistically significant and only slightly higher than controls. Moreover, values of slightly to moderately malaligned sternebra(e) remained far below the historical control upper limit (21.3% per litter). As such, this was not considered to be adverse.
There were slightly higher incidences of unossified metacarpal(s) and metatarsal(s) seen for fetuses at 330 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day (6.4% and 8.3% per litter, respectively, versus control value 2.7% per litter). These were not considered to be toxicologically relevant as there were no other indications of developmental delay seen like decreases in other related ossification parameters and fetal body weights remained in the same range as controls. - Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effects observed.
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 - Summary of Maternal Survival and Pregnancy Status
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
100 |
330 |
1000 |
|
Number (%) |
Number (%) |
Number (%) |
Number (%) |
Females on study |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
Females that aborted or delivered |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
Females that died |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) |
Females that were euthanized - gravid |
0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) |
0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) |
Females examined at scheduled - necropsy |
22 (100.0) |
22 (100.0) |
22 (100.0) |
22 (100.0) |
Total females gravid |
22 (100.0) |
22 (100.0) |
22 (100.0) |
22 (100.0) |
Table 2 - Summary of Fetal Data at Scheduled Necropsy
Dose |
|
Sex |
Viable |
Dead fetuses |
Resorptions |
Post implantation loss |
Implantation sites |
Corpora lutea |
Pre implantation loss |
Fetal weight |
No. of gravid females |
||
M |
F |
early |
late |
||||||||||
|
Total |
122 |
107 |
229 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
16 |
245 |
268 |
23 |
NA |
|
|
Total |
114 |
124 |
238 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
248 |
271 |
23 |
NA |
|
|
Total |
120 |
123 |
243 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
258 |
275 |
17 |
NA |
|
|
Total |
125 |
117 |
242 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
13 |
255 |
279 |
24 |
NA |
|
Table 3 - Summary of Fetuses amd Litters Data
|
Fetuses |
Litters |
||||||
Dose (mg/kg/day) |
0 |
100 |
330 |
1000 |
0 |
100 |
330 |
1000 |
Number examined externally |
229 |
238 |
243 |
242 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
21 |
Number examined viscerally |
113 |
119 |
120 |
121 |
21 |
22 |
22 |
21 |
Number examined skeletally - rib anomaly - ossification , reduced skull - vertebral centra, unossified - bent limb bones |
229 1 18 0 0 0 0 |
238 0 14 1 1 0 0 |
243 0 27 0 1 0 1 |
242 0 30 3 0 1 1 |
21 1 12 0 0 0 0 |
22 0 11 1 1 0 0 |
22 0 15 0 1 0 1 |
21 0 3 0 1 1 |
Total number with malformations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In the prenatal developmental toxicity study with dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6), conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 414 and in compliance with GLP, no maternal or developmental toxicity was observed in rats at doses up to 1000 mg/kg bw/day. The maternal and developmental NOAEL for D6 were concluded to be at least 1000 mg/kg bw/day based on no adverse effects.
- Executive summary:
A prenatal developmental toxicity study (OECD 414) of Dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane (D6) was carried out in rats by oral gavage. Eighty-eight mated female Wistar Han rats were assigned to four dose groups. The test item was administered undiluted once daily by oral gavage from Days 6 to 20 post-coitum at doses of 0, 100, 330 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day (Groups 2, 3 and 4 respectively). The rats of the control group received water at the same dose volume as Group 4 animals. Females were checked daily for the presence of clinical signs. Food consumption and body weight were determined at periodic intervals.
On Day 21 post-coitum, all animals were subjected to an examination post-mortem and external, thoracic and abdominal macroscopic findings were recorded. Terminal body and liver weights were recorded for each dam and body weights gains were calculated. A laparohysterectomy was performed on each dam of all groups. The uteri, placentae and ovaries were examined, and the numbers of fetuses, early and late resorptions, total implantations and corpora lutea were recorded. Gravid uterine weights were recorded, and corrected body weights (changes) were calculated. The fetuses were weighed, sexed and examined for external, visceral and skeletal malformations and developmental variations. All live fetuses were euthanized. One half of the fetuses were decapitated and the heads were fixed in Bouin’s fixative, these fetuses were dissected and examined for visceral anomalies. All fetuses were fixed in 96% aqueous ethanol and stained with Alizarin Red S and had skeletal examinations performed. Histopathology was performed on the livers from all dams of Groups 1 and 4.
RESULTS
At 1000 mg/kg bw/day, maternal animals had higher absolute and relative liver weights. The difference from controls was slight but statistically significant. There were no test item-related microscopic findings observed during the histopathological evaluation, therefore, the increases in liver weights were not considered toxicologically relevant.
No maternal toxicity was observed in the other parameters examined in this study with treatment up to 1000 mg/kg bw/day (mortality, clinical signs, body weights, food consumption and macroscopic examination). No developmental toxicity was observed up to 1000 mg/kg bw/day groups.
CONCLUSION
The maternal and developmental NOAEL for D6 were established as being at least 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
