Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2018
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 490 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests Using the Thymidine Kinase Gene)
Version / remarks:
july 2016
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation tests using the thymidine kinase gene

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Hydrocotyle asiatica, ext.
EC Number:
283-640-5
EC Name:
Hydrocotyle asiatica, ext.
Cas Number:
84696-21-9
Molecular formula:
not applicable
IUPAC Name:
Hydrocotyle asiatica, ext.
Test material form:
solid

Method

Target gene:
Thymidine kinase
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Without metabolic activation: 10, 25, 50, 100, 250, 450 and 600 microg/mL.
With metabolic activation: 100, 250, 450, 600, 650, 700 and 800 microg/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO 1% (v/v)
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
ethylmethanesulphonate
Evaluation criteria:
Acceptability of the Assay
A mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the criteria mentioned in current international guidelines and the current recommendations of the IWGT [8]:
- At least three out of four 96-well plates from the TFT resistance-testing portion of the experiment are scorable
- The cloning efficiency of the negative and/or solvent controls is in the range 65% - 120%.
- The spontaneous mutant frequency in the negative and/or solvent controls is in the range
50 - 170 mutants per 106 cells
- The cell number of the negative/solvent controls should undergo 8 - 32 fold increase during a 2 day growth period (short-term treatment)
- The clastogenic positive controls (MMS and B[a]P) have to produce an induced mutant frequency (total mutant frequency minus concurrent negative control mutant frequency) of at least 300 mutants per 106 cells with at least 40% of the colonies being small colonies or with an induced small colony mutant frequency of at least 150 mutants per 106 cells
- The RTG must be greater than 10%.
Statistics:
Evaluation of Results
The test item is considered mutagenic if the following criteria:
- The induced mutant frequency meets or exceeds the Global Evaluation factor (GEF) of 126 mutants per 106 cells and
- a dose-dependent increase in mutant frequency is detected.
Besides, combined with a positive effect in the mutant frequency, an increased occurrence of small colonies (≥40% of total colonies) is an indication for potential clastogenic effects and/or chromosomal aberrations.
Statistical methods might be used as an aid in evaluation of the test result.
A test item is considered to be negative if the induced mutant frequency is below the GEF and the trend of the test is negative.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: entella asiatica dry ext. is considered to be mutagenic in the in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay

Any other information on results incl. tables

Main Experiment - Toxicity Data, without metabolic activation

Test Group

Concen-tration

[µg/mL]

Number of Cells 4 h after Treatment

Number of Cells 24 h after Treatment

Number of Cells 48 h after Treatment

SGa

RSGb[%]

RCEc[%]

RTGd[%]

C1

0

363000

916000

1520000

13.9

104.1

105.0

109.3

C2

380000

985000

1250000

12.3

92.1

100.0

92.0

S1

0

376000

873000

1370000

12.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

S2

400000

1020000

1450000

14.8

2

10

392000

944000

1250000

11.8

88.2

105.0

92.6

3

25

364000

886000

1370000

12.1

90.8

89.6

81.3

4

50

385000

898000

1490000

13.4

100.0

116.4

116.5

5

100

369000

987000

1470000

14.5

108.5

93.9

101.8

6

250

336000

705000

1450000

10.2

76.4

93.9

71.7

7

450

336000

332000

836000

2.8

20.8

100.0

20.7

8

600

322000

276000

465000

1.4

10.4

123.0

12.8

EMS

300

358000

925000

1400000

13.0

96.8

73.0

70.6

MMS

10

362000

839000

1350000

11.3

84.7

70.9

60.0

Main Experiment - Mutagenicity Data, without metabolic activation

Cloning Efficiency (CE)

Mutagenicity Data

Test Group

Concen-tration [µg/mL]

Plate 1e

Plate 2e

CEf[%]

Number of cultures / 96 wells

MFg     [mutants / 106cells]

IMFh      [mutants / 106cells]

Plate 1e

Plate 2e

Plate 3e

Plate 4e

Mean

C1

0

82

74

104.6

11

19

21

21

18.0

99.9

/

C2

76

77

99.6

20

17

20

19

19.0

110.8

/

S1

0

76

78

101.2

19

15

16

10

15.0

84.3

/

S2

72

80

98.0

16

19

19

9

15.8

92.0

/

2

10

80

76

104.6

19

27

16

15

19.3

107.9

19.7

3

25

74

72

89.3

14

22

5

15

14.0

89.8

1.6

4

50

84

78

116.0

11

19

14

13

14.3

69.5

-18.6

5

100

72

77

93.5

18

24

21

20

20.8

130.4

42.3

6

250

72

77

93.5

23

25

22

16

21.5

136.1

47.9

7

450

71

82

99.6

25

15

22

19

20.3

119.5

31.3

8

600

85

80

122.6

39

12

17

18

21.5

107.8

19.6

EMS

300

58

74

72.7

67

68

72

60

66.8

824.7

736.5

MMS

10

67

63

70.6

61

55

69

63

62.0

742.4

654.3

 Main Experiment - Toxicity Data, with metabolic activation

Test Group

Concen-tration

[µg/mL]

Number of Cells 4 h after Treatment

Number of Cells 24 h after Treatment

Number of Cells 48 h after Treatment

SGa

RSGb[%]

RCEc[%]

RTGd[%]

C1

0

265000

965000

1430000

13.8

91.4

115.0

105.1

C2

327000

1030000

1450000

14.9

99.0

106.3

105.2

S1

0

330000

985000

1430000

14.1

100.0

100.0

100.0

S2

362000

1110000

1450000

16.1

5

100

359000

1070000

1430000

15.3

101.4

107.9

109.4

6

250

403000

1020000

1410000

14.4

95.3

111.4

106.1

7

450

352000

611000

1430000

8.7

57.9

116.8

67.6

8

600

347000

467000

1200000

5.6

37.1

107.9

40.1

9

650

312000

355000

917000

3.3

21.6

127.0

27.4

10

700

333000

380000

888000

3.4

22.4

136.3

30.5

11

800

316000

294000

677000

2.0

13.5

115.0

15.5

B[a]P

2.5

384000

843000

1430000

12.1

79.9

82.7

66.1

 

Main Experiment - Mutagenicity Data, with metabolic activation

Cloning Efficiency (CE)

Mutagenicity Data

Test Group

Concen-tration [µg/mL]

Plate 1e

Plate 2e

CEf[%]

Number of cultures / 96 wells

MFg     [mutants / 106cells]

IMFh      [mutants / 106cells]

Plate 1e

Plate 2e

Plate 3e

Plate 4e

Mean

C1

0

77

76

99.6

18

18

20

13

17.3

99.7

/

C2

73

75

92.1

18

23

18

18

19.3

121.7

/

S1

0

67

78

88.0

19

18

19

20

19.0

125.4

/

S2

69

74

85.4

21

16

20

21

19.5

133.2

/

5

100

73

76

93.5

17

20

15

15

16.8

102.7

-26.6

6

250

76

75

96.5

24

23

19

21

21.8

133.3

4.0

7

450

77

77

101.2

26

22

31

17

24.0

143.3

14.0

8

600

78

71

93.5

26

26

30

25

26.8

174.8

45.5

9

650

76

83

110.1

33

27

29

34

30.8

175.8

46.5

10

700

80

83

118.1

35

35

37

38

36.3

200.8

71.5

11

800

77

76

99.6

44

43

31

44

40.5

277.3

148.0

B[a]P

2.5

71

60

71.7

53

59

52

64

57.0

634.1

504.8

C:        Negative control

S:        Solvent control (1% DMSO; v/v)

e:        Number of cultures with cell growth.

f:         Cloning Efficiency, CE = ((-LN (((96 - (mean P1,P2)) / 96)) / 1.6) x 100)

g:       Mutant frequency,

MF = {-ln [negative cultures/total wells (selective medium)] / -ln [negative cultures/total wells (non selective medium)]}x800

h:        Induced mutant frequency, IMF = mutant frequency sample – mean value mutant frequency corresponding controls

EMS:   Ethylmethanesulfonate

MMS:     Methylmethanesulfonate

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Mutagenicity:
In the experiment without metabolic activation the mutant frequencies induced by the test item did not show any biologically relevant increase. A statistical analysis displayed that some of the mutant frequencies were significantly increased over those of the solvent controls. However, the GEF was not exceeded by the induced mutant frequency at any concentration. Therefore any differences observed in mutant frequency between the treated and concurrent control groups were concluded upon as not biologically relevant.

In the experiment with metabolic activation the mutant frequencies induced by the test item showed a distinct biologically relevant increase. The GEF of 126 was exceeded at the concentration of 800 µg/mL (148.0 mutants/106 cells). A statistical analysis displayed that the corresponding values of the mutant frequencies for the concentrations 600, 650, 700 and 800 µg/mL were significantly increased over those of the solvent controls. Moreover, a dose-response relationship was observed.

Clastogenicity:
The positive controls MMS and B[a]P induced a significant increase in mutant frequency and a biologically significant increase of small colonies (≥40%), thus proving the ability of the test system to indicate potential clastogenic effects.
In the main experiment with metabolic activation the percentage of small colonies in the negative controls and in the solvent controls, was found to be lower than 40%. Due to the increased number of small colonies and corresponding mutagenicity in the three highest dose groups, these concentrations of the test items were considered as potential clastogenic

Conclusion
In conclusion, in the described mutagenicity test under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Centella asiatica dry ext. is considered to be mutagenic in the in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (thymidine kinase locus) in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells.