Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-812-5 | CAS number: 110-88-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1992-03 to 1992-10
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study conducted in accordance with GLP
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 992
- Report date:
- 1992
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- (adopted 1984)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (Hoechst AG, Pharma Development Central Toxicology)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,3,5-trioxane
- EC Number:
- 203-812-5
- EC Name:
- 1,3,5-trioxane
- Cas Number:
- 110-88-3
- Molecular formula:
- C3H6O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,3,5-trioxane
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 1,3,5-trioxane
- Physical state: white crystals
- Analytical purity: 99.9%
- Lot/batch No.: 438 To II
- Stability under test conditions: stable during study period
- Storage condition of test material: dark at approx. 20°C
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- hprt gene, which codes for hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Large stocks of the mycoplasma-free V79 cell line were stored in liquid nitrogen in the laboratory of Genetic Toxicology of Hoechst AG, allowing the repeated use of the same cell culture batch for many experiments. Consequently, the parameters of the experiments remained similar because of the identical characteristics of the cells.
- Thawed stock cultures were kept at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in plastic-flasks. Seeding was carried out with about 8 to 10 x 10E+5 cells per flask in 30 ml of MEM-Medium supplement with approx. 10% fetal calf serum, containing approx. 2 mM l-glutamine and approx. 0.01 % neomycinsulfate.
- The cells were subcultured twice a week.
- For the selection of mutants the medium was supplemented with approx. 11 ug/ml thioguanine.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S-9 mix prepared from S-9 liver fraction obtained from Aroclor 1254-treated Sprague-Dawley male rats.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Both, in the absence and the presence of S9 mix, following concentrations were tested:
100, 250, 500 and 900 µg/ml - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: aqua bidest.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- untreated, with and without S9 mix, cells in MEM medium (containing Hanks salts and Hepes buffer).
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- treated with solvent (aqua bidest.), with and without S9 mix, cells in MEM medium (containing Hanks salts and Hepes buffer).
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
Migrated to IUCLID6: 1 mg/ml, dissolved in cell culture medium
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- untreated, with and without S9 mix, cells in MEM medium (containing Hanks salts and Hepes buffer).
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- treated with solvent (aqua bidest.), with and without S9 mix, cells in MEM medium (containing Hanks salts and Hepes buffer).
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9,10-dimethylbenzanthracene
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix
Migrated to IUCLID6: dissolved in DMSO, 7.7 µg/ml in culture medium
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- - The dose levels for the main test were selected on the basis of the results of a preliminary cytotoxicity assay;
- A stock solution containing 9% of test substance was prepared, taking into account the limit of solubility of the test substance in culture medium (10 mM, determined analytically);
- At the day of testing, dilutions were made from the stock solution until reaching the scheduled concentrations;
- Two independent experiments, with and without S9 mix, were conducted.
PROCEDURE FOR TESTING:
1)- Two days old, exponentially growing cultures which were more than 90 % confluent were trypsinated and a single cell suspension was prepared. Subsequently the cells were replated for mutagenicity testing and for determination of plating efficiency.
2)- Day 1, about 6 x 10E+5 to 10E+6 cells in 175 cm2 flasks with 30 ml medium were used for mutagenicity testing. About 400 cells in 25 cm2 flasks with 5 ml medium were used for determination of plating efficiency.
3)- Day 2, the cultures were treated with the selected concentrations of test substance for 4 hours.
4)- Day 5, the cultures for mutagenicity testing were then subcultured (4 days).
5)- Day 8, the cultures for determination of plating efficiency were fixed and stained (10% methylene blue).
6)- Day 9, the cultures for mutagenicity testing were further subcultured, first, in presence of 6-thioguanine for mutant selection, and then again for determination of plating efficiency.
7)- Day 16, colonies obtained from the subcultured cultures of the mutagenicity assay were fixed and stained.
8)- Only colonies with more than 50 cells were counted. - Evaluation criteria:
- - The test substance is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces with one of the test substance concentrations a mutation frequency that is three times higher than the spontaneous mutant frequency in the experiment.
- The test substance is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase in the mutation frequency. Such an evaluation may be considered independently from the enhancement factor for induced mutants. However, in a case by case evaluation both decisions depend on the level of the corresponding negative control data. - Statistics:
- Mann-Whitney-U-Test
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- in the preliminary cytotoxicity assay, trioxane was not cytotoxic to the V79 cells, with and without S9-mix, up to the limit of solubility (i.e 10 mM). In the mutagenicity assay, no cytotoxicity was observed up to 900 µg/ml (with/without S9 mix).
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: no precipitation was observed
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
The mutagenicity assay consisted of 2 independent experiments (Table 1).
- In the second experiment and in the absence of S9 mix, a slight but statistically significant enhancement of the mutation rate over the range of the negative controls was induced at a test concentration of 500 µg/ml. In fact, a mutation frequency of 18.2 mutant colonies per 10E+6 cells was reported, versus 7.7 for the solvent control.
For the negative control, mutant frequency was 15.9;
For the positive control, mutant frequency was 811.4;
For the remaining test concentration of trioxane, the mutant frequencies were 6.1, 12.1 and 10.3, for 100, 250 and 900 µg/ml, respectively.
- In the same experiment and in presence of S9 mix, a slight but statistically significant enhancement of the mutation rate over the range of the negative controls also was seen, however at a test concentration of 250 µg/ml. In fact, a mutation frequency of 24.5 was reported, versus 12.3 for the solvent control.
For the negative control, mutant frequency was 8.9;
For the positive control, mutant frequency was 209.5;
For the remaining test concentration of trioxane, the mutant frequencies were 11.4, 17.6 and 10.3, for 100, 500 and 900 µg/ml, respectively.
- Since the findings reported were not reproducible and showed no concentration-relationship, they were considered to have no biological relevance. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1.
Test group |
Dose (µg/ml) |
S9 mix |
Mutation frequency |
|
Main Expt. |
Repeat Expt. |
|||
Negative control |
0 |
- |
32.5 |
15.9 |
Solvent control |
0 |
- |
32.4 |
7.7 |
EMS |
1000 |
- |
893.4 |
811.4 |
Test article |
100 |
- |
28.4 |
6.1 |
Test article |
250 |
- |
24.8 |
12.1 |
Test article |
500 |
- |
11.5 |
18.2* |
Test article |
900 |
- |
11.2 |
10.3 |
|
||||
Negative control |
0 |
+ |
29.9 |
8.9 |
Solvent control |
5 |
+ |
38.2 |
12.3 |
DMBA |
7.7 |
+ |
239.3 |
209.5 |
Test article |
100 |
+ |
10.4 |
11.4 |
Test article |
250 |
+ |
28.3 |
24.5* |
Test article |
500 |
+ |
21.9 |
17.6 |
Test article |
900 |
+ |
38.6 |
10.3 |
Mutation frequency (mutant colonies per 106cells)
EMS: ethylmethanesulphonate
DMBA: 9,10-dimethylbenzanthracene
* p < 0.05
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.