Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1963
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
The study was conducted prior to the implementation of current testing guideline and GLP, however according to a still accepted testing method (Draize, 1944). Basic data were given and thus, the study is considered to be acceptable. The study was performed on an analogue substance (for justification of read-across, please refer to the corresponding assessment report in Section 13).

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1963
Report date:
1963

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
The testing method was based on the Draize test as described in Draize et al. (1944), J Pharm and Exp Ther 82. Each of ten guinea pigs received a series of 10 injections of 0.1% test item solution, every other day, in a depilated skin region below the midline of the back. The first injected volume was 0.05 mL, the following injected volumes were 0.1 mL each. After 2 weeks following the last induction injection, challenge was conducted by injection of 0.05 mL of the test solution in the skin of the flank. The injection site was examined for skin reaction after a period of 24 hours following challenge.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
Draize test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Test in guinea pigs available before it was decided to register the substance.

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Sodium N-(2-carboxyethyl)-N-dodecyl-β-alaninate
EC Number:
239-032-7
EC Name:
Sodium N-(2-carboxyethyl)-N-dodecyl-β-alaninate
Cas Number:
14960-06-6
IUPAC Name:
Sodium Lauriminodipropionate
Test material form:
other: liquid
Details on test material:
- Common name : Sodium lauriminodipropionate
- For more details, see below the Confidential details for test material
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Form: Liquid
The study was performed on a commercial product (aqueous solution) as the test item is manufactured and used in a liquid form.

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: not specified
- Weight at study initiation: 350 - 450 g
- No further details provided

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
0.1%
Day(s)/duration:
20 days, 10 injections
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
0.1%
Day(s)/duration:
14 days after last induction
Adequacy of challenge:
not specified
No. of animals per dose:
10
Details on study design:
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 10
- Exposure period: 20 days
- Site: depilated skin region below the midline of the back
- Frequency of applications: injection was done every other day
- Concentrations: 0.1% test item solution
- Injected volume: 0.1 mL, except for the first injection (0.05 mL)
- Reading: skin readings were made at the injection sites, 24 hours after each injection had been done; the skin was examined for diameter, heigh and colour.

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: one
- Challenge: done after 2 weeks following the last induction injection
- Site: skin of the flank.
- Concentrations: 0.1% test item solution
- Injected volume: 0.05 mL
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 hours

READING
The application site was examined for diameter, heigh and colour. The readings were compared with those made at the sites of the first injection series (induction). If the reactions after challenge were appreciably more pronounced than those observed during induction, the test item was defined as a sensitizer. The degree of sensitization was considered to be, in part, proportional to the observed increase in skin reaction.

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
0
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Reading:
1st reading
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
0
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.1%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
Skin reaction at induction was characterized by a mean diameter of 3.6 mm, a mean height of < 1 mm, and a pink coloration (indicates slight erythema). Reaction after challenge had a mean diameter of 3.5 mm, a mean height of < 1mm, and a pink coloration.
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified
Executive summary:

Sodium lauiminodipropionate, as a 10% aqueous solution, was tested at a concentration of 0.1% for sensitization according to the method of Draize (1944) using ten guinea pigs. Induction consisted of a series of 10 injections of 0.1 mL of test solution, except for the first injection done with 0.05 mL; the injections were done every other day over a period of 20 days. After 2 weeks following the last induction injection, challenge was done by single injection of 0.05 mL of the 0.1% test solution; skin reading was done after 24 hours.

Since no obvious differences were noticed when comparing the skin reaction at induction and that after challenge, sodium lauriminodipropionate was considered not to be a skin sensitizer unter the test conditions used.