Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin irritation / corrosion
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Reference
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 14 Jun 2021
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 31 July 2019
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Purity: 100 % (UVCB) (for details see analytical report No.: 21L00179)
Homogeneity: The test item was homogeneous by visual inspection.
Storage stability: The stability under storage conditions over the study period was guaranteed by the sponsor, and the sponsor holds this responsibility.
Expiry date: April 26, 2023
Storage conditions: Room temperature
Physical state/ color: Solid / black - Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- other: EpiDerm™ 200 kit supplied by MatTek In Vitro Life Science Laboratories (Bratislava, Slovakia)
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EPI-200
- Tissue batch number(s): 36107
- Certificate of analysis: provided by supplier
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: room temperature for 25 minutes and for 35 minutes in the incubator at 37°C
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: 37°C
REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Volume and number of washing steps: The tissues were washed with sterile PBS
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: not described
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1.0 mg / mL MTT diluent (0.3 mL per tissue)
- Incubation time: 3 h
- Spectrophotometer: Sunrise TM Absorbance Reader
- Wavelength: 570 nm
- Filter: no reference filter
NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3
CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE
- killed tissues
- Procedure used to prepare the killed tissues: EPI-200 tissue that is killed by freezing at –20°C
- N. of replicates : 3
The test substance is not able to reduce MTT directly. Therefore, an additional MTT reduction
control KC (freeze-killed control tissues) was not introduced.
NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: 1
PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA:
The test chemical is identified as requiring classification and labelling according to UN GHS
(Category 2 or Category 1) if the mean percent tissue viability after exposure and posttreatment
incubation is less than or equal (≤) to 50%.
A single test composed of at least three tissue replicates should be sufficient for a test chemical
when the result is unequivocal. However, in case of borderline results such as non-concordant
replicate measurements and/or mean percent tissue viabilities of 45% - 55%, a second test
should be considered as well as a third one in case of discordant results between the first two
tests.
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
- Negative conrol: Tissue viability is acceptable if the mean OD570 of the NC is ≥ 0.8. The mean OD570 of the NC should not exceed 2.8.
- Positive control: 5% SDS is used as PC and reflects the sensitivity of the tissues used in the test conditions. A viability of ≤ 20% is acceptable
- Variability: For every treatment, three tissues are treated in parallel. The inter-tissue variability is considered to be acceptable if the SD of % viability is ≤ 18%. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 25 μL sterile PBS was applied first. Thereafter, a bulk volume of ca. 25 μL solid test material (ca. 37 mg) was applied with a sharp spoon and homogeneously distributed with the water, so that the surface of the epidermis model was completely covered.
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 30 μL sterile PBS
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 30 μL 5% SDS - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1 h (25 min at room temperature, 35 min in the incubator at 37°C)
The tissues were washed with sterile PBS to remove residual test material 1 hour after start of
application. Rinsed tissues were blotted on sterile absorbent paper and transferred into new
6-well plates pre-filled with 0.9 mL fresh medium. When all tissues were rinsed, the surface of
each tissue was dried carefully with a sterile cotton swab. - Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 24 ± 2 h in the incubator (at 37°C)
After 24 ± 2 hours the tissues were transferred into new 6-well plates pre-filled with 0.9 mL
fresh medium and placed into the incubator for an additional 18 ± 2-hour post-incubation
period.
After the post-incubation period, the assay medium was replaced with 0.3 mL MTT solution,
and the tissues were incubated in the incubator for 3 hours. - Number of replicates:
- 3
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- mean of three replicates
- Value:
- 103
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- - OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: no
- Direct-MTT reduction: not able to reduce MTT directly; application of killed control tissues is not necessary
- Colour interference with MTT/colorimetric test: Slightly black colored compound residues remained on the tissues treated with the test substance after the washing procedure. However, this did not influence the validity of the study since the test substance was not able to reduce MTT directly. Further, it was demonstrated in a pretest that the color of the test substance did not interfere with the colorimetric test.
DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: profound historical data available
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: yes - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results observed and by applying the evaluation criteria described, it was concluded that the test substance does not show a skin irritation potential in the EpiDerm™ in vitro skin irritation test under the test conditions chosen.
Individual and mean OD570 values, individual and mean viability values and standard deviations
Test substance identification | tissue 1 | tissue 2 | tissue 3 | mean | SD | ||
NC | viable tissue | mean OD570 | 1.517 | 1.811 | 1.723 | 1.684 | |
viability [% of NC] | 90.1 | 107.5 | 102.3 | 100.0 | 9.0 | ||
test substance | viable tissue | mean OD570 | 1.715 | 1.833 | 1.656 | 1.734 | |
viability [% of NC] | 101.8 | 108.9 | 98.3 | 103.0 | 15.4 | ||
PC | viable tissue | mean OD570 | 0.046 | 0.054 | 0.043 | 0.048 | |
viability [% of NC] | 2.7 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 0.4 |
Slightly black colored compound residues remained on the tissues treated with the test substance after the washing procedure. However, this did not influence the validity of the study since the test substance was not able to reduce MTT directly. Further, it was demonstrated in a pretest that the color of the test substance did not interfere with the colorimetric test.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 022
- Report date:
- 2022
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 14 June 2021
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EU Method B.40bis In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method
- Version / remarks:
- 31 July 2019
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Alkaline co-precipitation products of soluble cobalt, manganese and nickel salts
- Molecular formula:
- Co(OH)2(0.005-0.1)Co2O3(0.03-0.3)Mn3O4(0.01-0.1)MnO2(0.02-0.25)Ni(OH)2(0.35-0.91) The stoichiometry of (OH)x+Oy per metal component in the substance cannot be determined unambiguously from solely analytical data, since the composition of the present UVCB substance is highly variable (i.e. complexly mixed and poorly ordered at the atomic level). The composition of the UVCB substance can be estimated based on analytical examination in combination with a calculation that is based on the average oxidation number (NOx) in the sum of the elements Ni, Co, Mn. As a result, the following constituents in concentration ranges as described below can be identified in the UVCB: The sum of all constituents equals 1 and ranges are: • Co(OH)2: 0.005-0.1 • Co2O3: 0.03-0.3 • Mn3O4: 0.01-0.1 • MnO2: 0.02-0.25 • Ni(OH)2: 0.35-0.91
- IUPAC Name:
- Alkaline co-precipitation products of soluble cobalt, manganese and nickel salts
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Purity: 100 % (UVCB) (for details see analytical report No.: 21L00179)
Homogeneity: The test item was homogeneous by visual inspection.
Storage stability: The stability under storage conditions over the study period was guaranteed by the sponsor, and the sponsor holds this responsibility.
Expiry date: April 26, 2023
Storage conditions: Room temperature
Physical state/ color: Solid / black
In vitro test system
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- other: EpiDerm™ 200 kit supplied by MatTek In Vitro Life Science Laboratories (Bratislava, Slovakia)
- Vehicle:
- other: test substance was applied undiluted or minimally moistened with deionized water or PBS
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EPI-200
- Tissue batch number(s): 34196
- Certificate of analysis: provided by supplier
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 3 min at room temperature (experiment 1) or 1 h in the incubator (experiment 2)
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation (if applicable): 37°C
REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Volume and number of washing steps: The tissues were washed with sterile PBS
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: not described
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1.0 mg / mL MTT diluent (0.3 mL per tissue)
- Incubation time: 3 h
- Spectrophotometer: Sunrise TM Absorbance Reader
- Wavelength: 570 nm
- Filter: no reference filter
NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 2
CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE
- killed tissues
- Procedure used to prepare the killed tissues (if applicable): EPI-200 tissue that is killed by freezing at –20°C
- N. of replicates : 2
The test substance is not able to reduce MTT directly. Therefore, an additional MTT reduction
control KC (freeze-killed control tissues) was not introduced.
NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: 1
PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA:
Corrosive potential of the test materials is predicted from the mean relative tissue viabilities
obtained after the 3-minute treatment compared to the negative control tissues treated
concurrently with deionized water. A chemical is considered as "corrosive" if the mean relative
tissue viability after the 3-minute treatment with a test material is decreased below 50%. In
addition, materials with a viability of ≥ 50% after the 3-minute treatment are considered as
"corrosive" if the mean relative tissue viability after the 1-hour treatment with a test material is
decreased below 15%.
A single test composed of at least two tissue replicates should be sufficient for a test chemical
when the result is unequivocal. However, in case of borderline results such as non-concordant
replicate measurements and/or mean percent tissue viabilities of 47% - 53%
(3-minute exposure) and 14% - 17% (1-hour exposure), a second test should be considered
as well as a third one in case of discordant results between the first two tests.
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
- Negative conrol: Tissue viability is acceptable if the mean OD570 of the NC is ≥ 0.8. The mean OD570 of the NC should not exceed 2.8.
- Positive control: 8 N potassium hydroxide solution is used as positive reference. A tissue viability of ≤ 30% is acceptable for the 3-minute exposure. Mean viability of the tissues exposed for 1 hour should be <15%.
- Variability: For every treatment, two tissues are treated in parallel. In the range of 20% and 100% viability, variability between the tissues is considered to be acceptable if the coefficient of variation CV) of % viability is ≤ 30%. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 25 μL deionized water was applied first. Thereafter, a bulk volume of ca. 25 μL solid test material (ca. 37 mg) was applied with a sharp spoon and homogeneously distributed with the water, so that the surface of the epidermis model was completely covered.
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 50 μL deionized water
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 50 μL 8 N potassium hydroxide solution - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Experiment 1: 3 min exposure at room temperature
Experiment 2: 1 h exposure in the incubator (37 °C)
The tissues were washed with PBS to remove residual test material 3 minutes or 1 hour after
start of the application treatment. - Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- Rinsed tissues were kept in 24-well plates (holding plates) at room temperature on assay
medium until all tissues per application time were dosed and rinsed. The assay medium was
then replaced with MTT solution and tissues were incubated for 3 hours. - Number of replicates:
- 2
Results and discussion
In vitro
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- experiment 1: 3 min exposure
- Value:
- 83.4
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- experiment 2: 1 h exposure
- Value:
- 96.7
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- - OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: no - Direct-MTT reduction: able to reduce MTT directly - Due to the ability of the test substance to reduce MTT directly, KC tissues were applied in
parallel. However, the results of the KC tissues did not indicate an increased MTT reduction. Thus, the KC was not used for viability calculation.
- Colour interference with MTT: Black compound residues remained on the tissues treated with the test substance after the washing procedure. However, this did not influence the validity of the study since there was no increased MTT reduction.
DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: profound historical data available
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: yes
Any other information on results incl. tables
Individual and mean OD570 values, individual and mean viability values, standard deviations and coefficient of variation
Exposure period: 3 min | |||||||
Test substance identification | tissue 1 | tissue 2 | mean | SD | CV [%] | ||
NC | viable tissue | mean OD570 | 1.946 | 2.013 | 1.980 | ||
viability [% of NC] | 98.3 | 101.7 | 100.0 | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||
test substance | viable tissue | mean OD570 | 1.592 | 1.709 | 1.650 | ||
viability [% of NC] | 80.4 | 86.3 | 83.4 | 4.2 | 5.0 | ||
PC* | viable tissue | mean OD570 | 0.290 | 0.273 | 0.282 | ||
viability [% of NC] | 15.2 | 14.3 | 14.8 | 0.6 | 4.4 |
* The PC tissues were tested in parallel within another test run (139). Thus, calculation of viability (% of NC) is based on the NC value (mean OD570: 1.905) of this test run.
Slightly black colored compound residues remained on the tissues treated with the test
substance after the washing procedure. However, this did not influence the validity of the study since the test substance was not able to reduce MTT directly. Further, it was demonstrated in a pretest that the color of the test substance did not interfere with the colorimetric test.
Individual and mean OD570 values, individual and mean viability values, standard deviations and coefficient of variation
Exposure period: 1 h | |||||||
Test substance identification | tissue 1 | tissue 2 | mean | SD | CV [%] | ||
NC | viable tissue | mean OD570 | 1.844 | 1.898 | 1.871 | ||
viability [% of NC] | 98.6 | 101.4 | 100.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | ||
test substance | viable tissue | mean OD570 | 1.870 | 1.747 | 1.809 | ||
viability [% of NC] | 99.9 | 93.4 | 96.7 | 4.6 | 4.8 | ||
PC* | viable tissue | mean OD570 | 0.096 | 0.093 | 0.094 | ||
viability [% of NC] | 5.2 | 5.0 | 5.1 | 0.1 | 2.6 |
* The PC tissues were tested in parallel within another test run (139). Thus, calculation of viability (% of NC) is based on the NC value (mean OD570: 1.838) of this test run.
Slightly black colored compound residues remained on the tissues treated with the test
substance after the washing procedure. However, this did not influence the validity of the study since the test substance was not able to reduce MTT directly. Further, it was demonstrated in a pretest that the color of the test substance did not interfere with the colorimetric test.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results observed and by applying the evaluation criteria described, it was concluded that the test substance does not show a skin corrosion potential in the EpiDerm™ in vitro skin corrosion test under the test conditions chosen.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.