Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
july to august 2008
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Groupe Interministeriel Des Produits Chimiques, Paris, France
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
weight: 2.41 - 3.00 kg
temperature: 19 - 24°C
relative humidity: 43 -66 %
lighting time: 12 hours daily
rate of air exchange: at least ten changes per hour
Type of coverage:
other: patch, secured with surgical adhesive tape
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
14 days
Number of animals:
3
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all
Time point:
other: 1 hour
Score:
> 0 - < 1
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: between D2 and D4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 1 hour
Score:
> 0 - < 1
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: between D1 and D3
Other effects:
On the cutaneous structure. a slight dryness was noted on the treated area, from D3 in three animals. The skin recovered a normal
aspect between D8 and D10.

see study report

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: EU, OECD GHS
Conclusions:
The results obtained, under these experimental conditions, enable to conclude that the test item
TIB KAT 223, according to the scales of interpretation retained:
- is irritant to skin (PSi = 2.3) according to the classification established in the Journal Officiel de la
République Française dated February 21st, 1982,
- and, must not be classified, according to the criteria for classification, packaging and labelling of
dangerous substances and preparations in compliance with the E.E.C. Directives 67/548, 2001/59
and 99/45. No symbol and risk phrases are required.
In accordance with the Globally Harmonized System (COM(2007)355 final), the test item must not
be classified in category 2 “Irritant”. No signal word and hazard statement are required.
Executive summary:

see study report

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
july to august 2008
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Groupe Interministeriel Des Produits Chimiques, Paris, France
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
-
Duration of treatment / exposure:
weight: 2.79 - 3.03 kg
temperature: 19 - 24°C
relative humidity: 43 -66 %
lighting time: 12 hours daily
rate of air exchange: at least ten changes per hour
Observation period (in vivo):
21 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
-
Irritation parameter:
other: -
Run / experiment:
-
Value:
> 0.2 - < 1
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
other: 24-72 hours
Score:
0.2
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
other: 24-72 hours
Score:
0.8
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
other: 24-72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
other: 24-72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Other effects:
It was noted a whitish secretion, requiring a physiological saline rinse, in one animal at D1.

see study report

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: EU, OECD GHS
Conclusions:
The results obtained, under these experimental conditions, enable to conclude that the test item TIB
KAT 223:
- is slightly irritant for the eye (Max. O.I = 8.0) according to the classification established in the
Journal Officiel de la République Française dated July 10th, 1992.
- and, must not be classified according to the criteria for the classification, packaging and labelling of
dangerous substances in compliance with the E.E.C. Directive n° 67/548, 2001/59 and 99/45. No
symbol and risk phrase are required.
In accordance with the Globally Harmonized System (COM(2007)355 final), the test item must not
be classified in category 2. No signal word and hazard statement are required.
Executive summary:

see study report

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification