Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
exposure based waiving
Value:
84 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
By inhalation
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
other: MAK Value
Overall assessment factor (AF):
1
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
84 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
MAK Value
AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
84 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
By inhalation
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
other: MAK value
Overall assessment factor (AF):
1
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
84 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
MAK Value
AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
MAK Value

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
exposure based waiving
Value:
0.091 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
immunotoxicity
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
other: MAK Value
Overall assessment factor (AF):
1
Dose descriptor:
NOAEC
AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
exposure based waiving
Value:
0.091 mg/m³
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
other: MAK Value
Overall assessment factor (AF):
1
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
MAK Value
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
MAK Value

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.07 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
immunotoxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
3 000
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
LOAEL
Value:
4 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
[oral absorption rat 50 %/dermal absorption human 1 %]
AF for dose response relationship:
10
Justification:
LOAL - > NOAEL
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
Extrapolation from subacute study to chronic exposure value in line with Table R.8-5 of Chapter R.8 of Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
Default value in line with Table R.8-3 and Appendix R. 8-2, part 2, example B5 of Chapter R.8 of Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessmen
AF for other interspecies differences:
1
Justification:
not relevant
AF for intraspecies differences:
1
Justification:
Default value in line with Section R.8.4.3.1 of Chapter R.8 of Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
Good quality data available
AF for remaining uncertainties:
2.5
Justification:
Default value in line with Section R.8.4.3.1 of Chapter R.8 of Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
5
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
5

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Overall assessment factor (AF):
5
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population

The substance is used a an intermediate for polymerisation in industry.In the polymerisation process the substance reacts completly and becomes an inseperable part of the matrix. Migration studies have shown that there is not release of Dioctyltin form the matrix. Also in solution experiments with the matrix (tetrahydrofurane, hexane, ...) could not any longer determine Dioctyltin anymore.

In conclusion there is no hazard vor the general population / consumer.