Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-402-9 | CAS number: 120-51-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian cell study: DNA damage and/or repair
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Published study.
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Measurement of Unscheduled DNA Synthesis and S-Phase Synthesis in Rodent Hepatocytes Following In Vivo Treatment: Testing of 24 Compounds
- Author:
- Mirsalis JC, Tyson CK, Steinmetz KL, Loh EK, Hamilton CM, Bakke JP & Spalding JW
- Year:
- 1 989
- Bibliographic source:
- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 14:155-164
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Induction of UDS in the rat liver in vivo
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- Data is published literature
- Type of assay:
- unscheduled DNA synthesis
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Benzyl acetate
- EC Number:
- 205-399-7
- EC Name:
- Benzyl acetate
- Cas Number:
- 140-11-4
- Molecular formula:
- C9H10O2
- IUPAC Name:
- benzyl acetate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Benzyl acetate
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Simonsen Laboratories (Gilroy, CA) and Hilltop Laboratory Animals (Chatsworth CA).
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 180 - 300g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: no data
- Fasting period before study: no data
- Housing: Three rats per cage in polypropylene cages with hardwood chip bedding.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Purina Rodent Chow # 5001 (Ralston Purina Co., St. Louis) ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Deionized 0.5um charcoal filtered tap water ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: Not documented
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Not documented
- Humidity (%): Not documented
- Air changes (per hr): Not documented
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hour light/dark cycle.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: Not documented
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Animals were administered the test substance by oral gavage as a single bolus dissolved or suspended in corn oil or water. Doses were selected based approximately on the oral LD50 of the compound and were generally selected as 80%, 40% and 10% of the LD50. The acute LD50 was never exceeded and 1000mg/kg was selected as the highest dose if hte LD50 exceeded this value. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Animals were exposed to a single dose of the test substance.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Single exposure
- Post exposure period:
- No information provided
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
50, 200, 1000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
no data
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 3 male rats
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Positive control(s):
- corn oil
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Hepatocyte cultures prepared from perfused liver.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
Doses were selected based approximately on the oral LD50 of the compound and were generally selected as 80%, 40%, and 10% of the LD50. The acuteLD50 was never exceeded, and 1000 mg/kg was selected as the highest dose if the LD50 exceeded this value.
If hepatocyte cultures showed very poor viability and attachment at nonlethal doses, the top dose was reduced to achieve acceptable hepatocyte attachment.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields):
A single-cell suspension of hepatocytes was obtained by combing out cells from the perfused liver into a petri dish containing 37°C collagenase solution. Cells were collected by 5 min centrifugation at 50g, resuspended in cold medium, and filtered through sterile gauze. Viability was determined using Trypan blue exclusion. In general, hepatocyte viability was not adversely affected by chemical treatment; i.e., viability generally exceeded 70%, and attachment did not vary. In cases where attachment or viability were poor, lower doses were selected for testing.
Approximately 6 x 10E5 cells were seeded into each well of a Falcon 9.6 cm2, 6-well culture plate. Each well contained a 25 mm round Thermanox coverslip in Williams' medium E (WE) supplemented with 2 mM I-glutamine, 50 ug/ml gentamycin sulfate, and 10% fetal bovine serum. After 1.5-2.0 hr incubation in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C, 5% CO2 the cultures were washed to remove nonviable cells (those not attached to the coverslips). All washes and subsequent culturing were done using serum-free WE medium.
The sampling for the UDS test was conducted at 2 and 12 hours.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Cultures were incubated in Williams medium E (WE) containing 10 uCi/ml 3H-(methyl)-thymidine (specific activity, approximately 80 Ci/mmol) for 4 hr at 37°C, 5% C02, followed by 14-18 hr in WE containing 0.25 mM unlabeled thymidine. The cultures were then washed twice with WE, followed by 10 min in 1% sodium citrate to swell cells, fixed in 1:3 glacial acetic acid:ethanol for 30 min, and washed 3 to 6 times with deionized water. The dried coverslips were mounted to glass slides using Permount. The slides were dipped in Kodak NTB-2 nuclear track emulsion diluted 1: 1 with deionized water, and exposed at -20°C for 7-14 days and then developed and stained
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
UDS Measurement:
An area of a slide was randomly selected, and 50 morphologically unaltered cells were counted using an ARTEK Model 880 colony counter interfaced to a VAX 8800 computer. The highest of two nuclear-sized areas over the cytoplasm and adjacent to the nucleus was subtracted from the nuclear count to determine the net grains/nucleus (NG). The percentage of cells undergoing repair (%IR) was determined as the percent of those cells exhibiting 5 or more NG. Three slides \vere scored for each animal or concentration for a total of 150 cells per animal.
The test substance was considered negative if the NG of all dose groups was a negative number and the %IR was less than 10%. It was considered positive if the average NG of any dose group exceeded 0 NG. If the test compound had negative NG values, but %IR values greater than 10%, it was considered equivocal. - Evaluation criteria:
- UDS:
Compounds were considered negative if the NG of all dose groups was a negative number and the %IR was less than 10%. Compounds were considered positive if the average NG of any dose group exceeded 0 NG. Compounds with negative NG values, but %IR values greater than 10% were considered equivocal. - Statistics:
- No information provided.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Additional information on results:
- The test substance was considered to be negative as the net grain/nucleus was always a negative number and the percentage of cells undergoing repair was always less than 10% for each dose level tested at each timepoint examined.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Measurement of UDS in Male Rat Hepatocytes Following In Vivo Treatment:
|
|
|
Male rat |
||
|
Dose (mg/kg) |
Time (hr) |
NG |
(n) |
%IR |
Control / corn oil |
- |
2 12 |
-6.4±2.9 -5.6± 0.4 |
(2) (52) |
1± 0 2±0 |
Benzyl Acetate |
50
200
1000 |
2 12
2 12
2 12 |
-4.1± 1.4 -2.2 ±0.2
-5.3±0.3 -4.8±1.0
-4.5±1.1 -4.6±0.3 |
(3) (3)
(3) (3)
(3) (3) |
3±1 1±0
1± 1 2 ± 1
1± 0 1 ± 1 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
No evidence for the induction of UDS was seen in this assay - Executive summary:
The read-across substance benzyl acetate was investigated for its ability to induce unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) in male F344 rats following in vivo treatment. Hepatocytes, isolated by liver perfusion, were used to assess the DNA-damaging potential of benzyl acetate. Rats received a single dose of the test substance dissolved or suspended in corn oil administered by oral gavage. The dose levels used were 5, 200 and 1000 mg/kg bw. The responses were examined at the 2 and 12 hour timepoints. The results of this study indicate that benzyl acetate was negative under the conditions employed in this study as the net grain/nucleus count was always negative and the percentage of cells undergoing repair was less than 10%.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.