Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in chemico
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
see chapter 13 read across justification

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442C (In Chemico Skin Sensitisation Assays addressing the Adverse Outcome Pathway key event on covalent binding to proteins)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
other: Direct peptide binding assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
L-2-hydroxy-2-phenylacetic acid
EC Number:
210-276-6
EC Name:
L-2-hydroxy-2-phenylacetic acid
Cas Number:
611-71-2
Molecular formula:
C8H8O3
IUPAC Name:
hydroxy(phenyl)acetic acid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): L-2-Hydroxy-2-phenylacetic acid
- Physical state: solid (white)
- Analytical purity: 99.972 area%
- Lot/batch No.: 12-0001

In chemico test system

Details of test system:
cysteine peptide, (Ac-RFAACAA-COOH)
lysine peptide (Ac-RFAAKAACOOH)
Details on the study design:
The test substance was prepared as a 100 mM stock solution in acetonitrile just prior to incubation with the synthetic peptides.
The peptides are custom material (Supplier: GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA and/or RS Synthesis, Louisville KY, USA) containing. Because the test substance preparation was incubated with the peptide shortly after preparation, no analysis of the test substance in the vehicle was performed.
The test substance was solved in a suitable vehicle. Three samples of the test substance were incubated with each peptide. Additionally triplicates of the concurrent vehicle control (= NC) were incubated with the peptides. The remaining non-depleted peptide concentration was determined thereafter by HPLC with gradient elution and UV-detection at 220 nm. In addition calibration samples of known peptide concentration, prepared from the respective peptide stock solution used for test-substance incubation, were measured in parallel with the same analytical method.
The samples were prepared in triplicates for each peptide. The C-containing peptide was incubated with the test substance in a ratio of 1:10 (0.5 mM peptide, 5 mM test substance) and
the K-containing peptide in a ratio of 1:50 (0.5 mM peptide, 25 mM test substance). The samples were prepared in suitable tubes, capped tightly and incubated at 25°C ± 2.5°C in the dark for 24 +/- 2 hours. Prior to HPLC analysis the samples were visually investigated for any precipitate that may have formed during the exposure period. The HLPC analysis of the batch of samples started about 24 hours after sample preparation and the analysis time itself did not exceed 30 hours.
The mean peptide depletion of a test substance was calculated as the mean value of Ccontaining peptide depletion and K-containing peptide depletion. According to the classification tree model described by Gerberick et al. for substances with known molecular weight highly reactive test substance (mean peptide depletion > 42.47 %) is predicted to be a strong sensitizer, a moderately reactive test substance (22.62 % < mean peptide depletion < 42.47 %) a moderate sensitizer, a test substance of low reactivity (8.11 % < mean peptide depletion < 22.62 %) a weak sensitizer.
Vehicle / solvent:
acetonitrile
Positive control:
other: Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA; CAS: 97-90-5), prepared as a 50 mM solution in acetonitrile

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
All peptide was depleted by the positive control substance Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate.

In vitro / in chemico

Results
Group:
test chemical
Parameter:
other: C-peptide and K-peptide
Value:
0.79 %
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Remarks:
0.79% mean peptide depletion (1.57% cysteine peptide depletion -0.69% lysine peptide depletion)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Negative depletions were considered to be “zero” for calculation of the mean peptide depletion, which was thus calculated to be 0.79%.
No co-elution of test substance and peptides was noticed.
Executive summary:

The mean Cysteine-peptide depletion, caused by the test substance was determined to be 1.57%.
The mean Lysine-peptide depletion, caused by the test substance was determined to be -0.69%.
Based on the observed results and applying the prediction model proposed in Gerberick et. al (2007) it was concluded that L-2-Hydroxy-2-phenylacetic acid shows a minimal chemical reactivity in the DPRA under the test conditions chosen.