Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-913-6 | CAS number: 75-89-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction: other studies
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to reproduction: other studies
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1995-03-27 to 1995-10-09
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- The study report was well documented and the study met basic scientific principles. The study was performed in compliance with GLP.
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 997
- Report date:
- 1997
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Three cell culture systems such as isolated leydig cell cultures, Sertoli cell only cultures and Sertoli-germ cell co-cultures obtained from male Sprague Dawley Rats, were exposed to the 2,2,2Trifluoroethanol (TFE). In parallel, cells were also treated with metabolites of TFE: Trifluoroacetaldehyde (TFAld) and Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).Then, different cell parameters were analysed like the protein content, the lactate and pyruvate production, the hormonally stimulated testosterone production, the morphology depending on the type of cell cultures.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of method:
- in vitro
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol
- EC Number:
- 200-913-6
- EC Name:
- 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol
- Cas Number:
- 75-89-8
- Molecular formula:
- C2H3F3O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,2,2-trifluoroethan-1-ol
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 2,2,2 trifluoroethanol (TFE)
- Physical state: colorless liquid
- Lot/batch No.: no data
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: no data
- Stability under test conditions: assumed to be stable during the test (sponsor responsibility)
- Storage condition of test material: no data
- Other: The CTL reference number assigned to this sample of TFE was Y04314/008. The test item was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Company Limited (Gillingham, Dorset, UK).
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- other: Cells in culture from male Sprague-Dawley or Alpk:APfSD (Wistar-derived) Rats were exposed to the test item
- Strain:
- other: not applicable
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River UK (Male Sprague Dawley (Crl:CD(SD)Br)) or Barriered Animal Breeding Unit (Zeneca, Alderley Park, Cheshire, UK ( Alpk:APfSD (Wistar-Derived)))
- Age at study initiation: 26-32 days for the isolation of Sertoli cells, 10 weeks for the isolation of Leydig cells
- Weight at study initiation: no data
- Fasting period before study: no data
- Housing: the rats were housed at up to 5 per cage
- Use of restrainers for preventing ingestion (if dermal): yes/no
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: between 3 and 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21°C +/-2°C
- Humidity (%): 55% (+/- 15%)
- Air changes (per hr):
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12hrs/12hrs
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To:
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- other: the cells were exposed to the test item in the culture medium
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- other: not applicable
- Vehicle:
- other: The test item was prepared in fresh culture medium used for the maintenance of the isolated cells
- Details on exposure:
- not applicable
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Nuclear magnetic resonance (19F and 1H) analysis of this sample in-house confirmed its identity as TFE and its stated purity.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- approximately 5 hours (Leydig cells) or 24 hours (Leydic cells and Sertoli cells).
- Frequency of treatment:
- a single dose
- Duration of test:
- no data
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0.05 µM-50 mM for the test on Leydig cells
Basis:
nominal conc.
Concentration of TFE
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0.1-20 mM for the test on Sertoli cells (SGCC and SCOC)
Basis:
nominal conc.
Concentration of TFE
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0.05 µM-50 mM for the test on Leydig cells
Basis:
nominal conc.
Concentration of TFAld
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
5 µM-0.75 mM for the test on Sertoli cells (SGCC and SCOC)
Basis:
nominal conc.
Concentration of TFAld
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Not applicable
- Control animals:
- other: not applicable
- Details on study design:
- no details
- Statistics:
- The results were analysed by two-tailed Student's t-test and a p value of <0.05 was chosen to represent a statistically significant difference between values for treated samples compared with controls.
Results and discussion
Effect levels
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 5 other: mM
- Based on:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
Observed effects
A concentration of 100 mM of TFE for 24 hrs was cytotoxic to Leydig cells as indicating by a significant increase of LDH activity in the culture medium of cells treated in comparison with the culture medium control. TFE at concentrations up to and including 50 mM had little significant effects on extracellular LDH activity in Leydig cell cultures indicating that there was no cytotoxicity. Consequently, 50 mM was the maximum used concentration of TFE.
A concentration of 100 mM of TFE for 24 hrs was cytotoxic to Sertoli cells (SCOC) as indicating by a significant increase of LDH activity in the culture medium of cells treated in comparison with the culture medium control. A concentration up to and including 50 mM of TFE for 24 hrs was not cytotoxic to Sertoli cells (SGCC) as indicating by a level of LDH activity in the culture medium of cells treated equivalent to the one of the culture medium control.
Consequently a maximum concentration of 20 mM of TFE was used in subsequent experiments on SCOC and SGCC.
Effect of TFE on Leydig cells:
The addition of TFE to isolated Leydig cells resulted in a small but statistically significant increase in basal testosterone production at 5 hours and 24 hours compared with culture medium controls. Nevertheless, this small increase is not considered to be biologically relevant since isolated Leydig cells have a much larger capacity to produce testosterone.
Testosterone production by hormonally-stimulated Leydig cells exposed to TFE for 5 hours was statistically significantly decreased compared with culture medium control values in all 3 experiments. This effect was dose related. The no-effect level for this effect was less than 5 mM TFE. After a 24 hour incubation period with TFE, the effects on hormonally-stimulated testosterone production were small and inconsistent within 2 experiments. Therefore these statistically significant changes are considered to be of little biological relevance.
Effect of TFE on Sertoli cells:
Exposure of SGCC to TFE had no effect on the morphology of the cultures. It was not possible to critically evaluate the effects on SCOC as the morphological appearance of the control samples was of poor quality.
The presence of TFE, at concentrations up to and including 20 mM, in the culture medium of SCOC incubated in the absence of hormone for 24 hours, had no effect on lactate production compared with culture medium controls. However at the same concentration in the culture medium of SGCC, a statistically significant increase in lactate production was observed. Nevertheless, these observations were considered to be of little biological relevance. In the presence of dbcAMP, TFE had no significant effect on lactate production by SCOC and SGCC compared with dbcAMP controls.
The presence of TFE in SCOC and SGCC culture in the absence or presence of dbcAMP had no significant effect on the pyruvate production in the culture medium.
The addition of TFE to SGCC under basal conditions resulted in small but statistically significant effects on cell loss from the cultures compared with culture medium controls. These effects were inconsistent between the 3 experiments. Therefore these changes are considered to be of little biological relevance. Under hormonally-stimulated conditions, TFE addition to SGCC resulted in a significant increase in cell loss from the monolayer in 2 out of 3 experiments. In the third experiment, TFE had no effects on this parameter. Overall, is considered that TFE had little effect on cell loss from SGCC in the presence of hormone.
The exposure of SGCC to TFE for 24 hours up to and including 20 mM had no significant effect on LDHX activity in the culture medium compared with culture medium control values.
Effect on a TFAld exposure:
The addition of TFAld to isolated Leydig cells resulted in a statistically significant decrease in basal testosterone production compared with culture medium controls at 5 hours and 24 hours which was dose-related.
TFAld is highly cytotoxic to Sertoli cells. Therefore, a maximum concentration of 0.75 mM TFAld was used. TFAld affected Sertoli cells in altering their morphology, in inducing a significant decrease in basal lactate and pyruvate production.
Any other information on results incl. tables
The cell cultures used in this study were demonstrated to be responsive to known positive control compounds (KTZ, 1,3 DNB, MAA and TFAA) and the effects produced were used as benchmarks to aid in the assessment of the test compounds.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under general considerations, the negative results observed with TFE on the reproductive cells indicated a possible limitation of the in vitro techniques as used in this study for chemicals which require metabolism to produce an active species. In fact, TFAld as direct TFE metabolite, showed significant positive results in this study.
- Executive summary:
In an in vitro fertility study performed in compliance with GLP, the intrinsic potential of 2,2,2 trifluoroethanol (TFE) to alter the function and/or integrity of the principal cell types of the testis, was determined. The TFE metabolites as trifluoroacetaldehyde (TFAld) and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) were also included in the study. Isolated Leydig cell cultures (LCC), Sertoli cell only cultures (SCOC) and Sertoli-germ cell co-cultures (SGCC) were obtained from the testis of Sprague Dawley rat.
TFE (99.9% purity) was added for 5 or 24 hours to cells cultured in 24 well tissue culture plates. The TFE concentration range was 0.05 µM to 50 mM to expose Leydig cells and 0.1 to 20 mM to expose Sertoli cells. Moreover, the hormone, human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) was added to the LCC to stimulate testosterone poduction.
Several positive controls (ketoconazole, 1,3 -dinitrobenzene, methoxyacetic acid) were used to validate the study.
After the in vitro TFE exposure period, the cells were harvested and the medium was also collected to further evaluations and observations. Various cell parameters including LCC and SGCC culture protein content, LDH activity, LCC medium culture secreted testosterone, LDH-X (specific isoenzyme of LDH of spermatocyte in pachytene stage) in SGGC culture medium, SGCC medium culture lactate and pyruvate concentrations were measured. Moreover, the morphological cell appearance was analysed in order to evaluate the potential adverse effect of TFE on reproductive system cells.
Under the test conditions, TFE showed only a small effect on the Leydig cell function and essentially no effect on Sertoli cells. Indeed, at high concentrations, TFE affected Leydig cell function by inhibiting testosterone output but only in the presence of hCG hormone. However, TFAld induced marked effects on the Leydig cell as decreased testotesterone production, on the SCOC and SCCC as altered morphology, decreased lactate and pyruvate production in SCOC, increased cell loss and LDHX leakage in SGCC.
Under general considerations, the negative results observed with TFE on the reproductive cells indicated a possible limitation of the in vitro techniques as used in this study for chemicals which require metabolism to produce an active species. In fact, TFAld as direct TFE metabolite, showed significant positive results in this study.
This study doesn't satisfy the requirements for a reproduction toxicity study but this study is scientifically acceptable as it was well conducted and focused on the target cells of the testis in order to explain the effects observed in vivo on the rat testis after TFE exposure.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.