Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 28 March 1991 to 21 June 1991
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
May 12, 1981
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
5-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-o-cresol
EC Number:
259-583-7
EC Name:
5-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-o-cresol
Cas Number:
55302-96-0
Molecular formula:
C9H13NO2
IUPAC Name:
5-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-methylphenol
Test material form:
solid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Analytical purity: 99%
- Lot/batch No.: OP 169/2
- Description: brown fine powder
- Trade name: IMEXINE OAG

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: no data
- Stability under test conditions: no data

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: CEGAV specialized breeding establishment (Les Hautes Noës, Saint mars d'Egrenne, 61350 PASSAIS LA CONCEPTION, FRANCE) .
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: between 1 .5 kg and 2 .5 kg
- Housing: Animals were kept in cages of standard size . Excreta were eliminated by unrolling plastified brown paper which was placed under the cages .
- Diet: ad libitum to UAR 112 foodstuff (analytical certificate is provided in the study report).
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum to softened tap drinking water in polycarbonate feeder bottles with a stainless steel teat . A water sample was taken every three month and sent to the Department of Veterinary Services, 216, rue Louis Mallet, 18014 BOURGES Cedex, FRANCE for analysis (analytical certificate is provided in the study report).
- Acclimation period: 7 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-21
- Humidity (%): 45-65
- Air changes (per hr): 10 times
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 21 March 1991 To: 31 March 1991

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Remarks:
application site moistened with 0 .5 ml of paraffin oil in order to ensure a good contact between the skin and the test item
Controls:
other: The non-treated flank of each animal served as a control
Amount / concentration applied:
0 .5 g of the test item was applied to the right flank of each animal. The non-treated flank of each animal served as a control.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
Approximately 1 hour, then 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the dressing and of the test item. Observation could be continued until Day 8 and Day 15 if signs of irritation persisted at 72 hours.
Number of animals:
3 females
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Preparation: 24 hours before administration, the dorsal region of each animal was carrefully shaved over two symmetrical zones, measuring at least 14 cm x 5 cm, in relation to the vertebral axis, using an AESCULAP FAVORITA II GT 104 electric trimmer. Any animal with damaged skin was eliminated from the study at the time of application. The left flank of each of the animals was left intact.
- Area of exposure: approximately 6 cm2
- Application: the test item was applied to the right flank of each of the animals. The test item was deposited on a gauze square of approximately 6 cm2 . The side of the gauze in contact with the compound was applied to the skin. The application site was moistened with 0 .5 ml of paraffin oil to ensure a good contact between the skin and the test item. The non-treated flank of each animal served as a control.
- Type of wrap if used: The gauze square was protected by a swab held in place with a URGOPORE microporous and non-allergic non-occlusive dressing, and the whole being held in place by coalescent elastic and cohesive hypoallergenic tape COHEVET . Dressings were held in place for 4 hours after application .

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no data
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours

OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
1 hour, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the end of the exposure period, extended to days 8 and 15 if signs of irritation persisted at 72hours.

SCORING SYSTEM:

Erythema and Scab Formation
No erythema ...................................................................................................................................0
Slight erythema (scarcely perceptible) ...........................................................................................1
Clearly visible erythema ..................................................................................................................2
Moderate to marked erythema ........................................................................................................3
Severe erythema (reddish purple) with formation of slight eschares (deep lesions) ...................4

Oedema Formation
No oedema ..............................................................................................................................0
Very slight oedema (scarcely perceptible)..............................................................................1
Slight oedema (contours well defined, visible swelling) .........................................................2
Moderate oedema (thickness approximateiy 1 mm) ................................................................3
Severe oedema (thickness more than 1 mm and area greater than that of application) .........4

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The cutaneous application of the test item did not cause any cutaneous irritation reaction in all animals of the study.
The mean indices per rabbit, for the three times together were:
Erythema and edema : 0 in all animals.
Other effects:
None.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the experimental conditions of this study, the test material is not classified as irritating to the skin according to the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) and the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) criteria.
Executive summary:

This GLP-compliant study was performed to assess the potential of the test material to induce skin irritation in vivo, according to OECD Guideline 404 (dated May 12, 1981).

Material and methods

0.5 g of the solid test material were applied under semi-occlusive dressing during 4 hours, on a shaved skin area (right flank) of 3 female rabbits. The left flank served as a control. Skin reactions were recorded 1 hour and then 24, 48 and 72 hours after the removal of the dressing.

Results

No dermal lesions were observed in any animal at any of the observation time points. The individual mean scores (24, 48 and 72 hours) of all three animals for erythema and edema were both: 0.0, 0.0 and 0.0.

Conclusion

Under the experimental conditions of this study, the test material is not classified as irritating to the skin according to the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) and the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) criteria.