Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

No carcinogenicity study is required.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Carcinogenicity: via oral route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Carcinogenicity: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Available data give no concern on carcinogenic properties of the test substance. Thus, classification of Aluminium trilactate as carcinogenic is not required according to Directive 67/548/EEC as well as GHS Regulation EC No 1272/2008 and therefore labelling is not necessary.

Additional information

No carcinogenicity study is required. There is no concern for mutagenicity or genotoxicity at physiologically relevant levels. In the available sub-chronic studies and publications there are no indications of non-specific organ damage or chronic inflammation. Available data give no concern on carcinogenic properties of the test substance.

Moreover, EFSA (2008) concluded that “Overall the database on carcinogenicity of aluminium compounds is limited. In the most recent study no indication of any carcinogenic potential was obtained in mice given aluminium potassium sulphate at high levels in the diet. Overall the Panel concluded that aluminium is unlikely to be a human carcinogen at exposures relevant to dietary intake.”

EFSA (2008) Safety of aluminium from dietary intake, The EFSA Journal 754, 1-34, available via internet: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/de/efsajournal/pub/754.htm


Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via oral route endpoint:
No carcinogenicity study is required. There is no concern for mutagenicity or genotoxicity at physiologically relevant levels. In the available sub-chronic studies and publications there are no indications of non-specific organ damage or chronic inflammation. Available data give no concern on carcinogenic properties of the test substance.