Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 262-967-7 | CAS number: 61788-32-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-compliant study, available as unpublished report, well-documented, no restrictions, adequate for assessment.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 981
- Report date:
- 1981
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other: International Research and Development Corp. method
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Terphenyl, hydrogenated
- EC Number:
- 262-967-7
- EC Name:
- Terphenyl, hydrogenated
- Cas Number:
- 61788-32-7
- Molecular formula:
- C18Hn (n >18-36)
- IUPAC Name:
- Terphenyl, hydrogenated
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Dutchland Laboratories, Denver, Pennsylvania
- Age at study initiation: young adult
- Weight at study initiation: mean of 2509 g (males) - 2495 g (females)
- Housing: individually housed
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 20 to 22 days prior to study initiation
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hour on/off cycle
IN-LIFE DATES: Study initiated on March 11, March 12 and March 13, 1980 and sacrificed on April 1, April 2 and April 3, 1980.
Administration / exposure
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: the back
- % coverage: approximately 30% of the body surface
- Type of wrap if used: Saran Wrapt and Elastoplast tape
- Time intervals for shavings or clipplings: The rabbits were shaved as needed during the study period to prevent the test or control articles from becoming matted in the hair and to facilitate accurate observations. Twice each week, immediately prior to test or control article administration, the dorsal skin of one-half of the rabbits in each sex group was abraded.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): the test site is washed with tepid IRDC tap water. Disposable paper towels were used to wash and dry the test site.
- Time after start of exposure: 6 hours
TEST MATERIAL
Individual doses were adjusted weekly based on the body weights obtained at the beginning of each study week.
USE OF RESTRAINERS FOR PREVENTING INGESTION: yes - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 21 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- 6 hours/day, 5 days/week
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Basis: nominal per unit body weight
- Dose / conc.:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Basis: nominal per unit body weight
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Basis: nominal per unit body weight
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Basis: nominal per unit body weight
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- number of animals with abraded skin: 5M,5F/dose + Control article
number of animals with unabraded skin: 5M,5F/dose + Control article - Control animals:
- yes
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- MORTALITY: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: once daily
DERMAL IRRITATION : Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: once daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: obtained and recorded during the pretest period and at weekly intervals during the study period.
FOOD CONSUMPTION:
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No data
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes
WATER CONSUMPTION: No data
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: Once during the pretest period and at 21 days of study
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- Animals fasted: No
- How many animals: on 5 rabbits (intact and abraded) per sex per group
- Parameters checked in Table 1 were examined.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: Once during the pretest period and at 21 days of study
- Animals fasted: No
- How many animals: on 5 rabbits (intact and abraded) per sex per group
- Parameters checked in Table 2 were examined.
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes (see Table 3)
- Statistics:
- Body weights (week 3), haematologic and biochemical parameters (Day 21) and absolute and relative organ weights (terminal sacrifices) were compared by analysis of variance (one-way classification), Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variances and the appropriate t-test (for equal or unequal variances).
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY:
A number of incidental and spontaneous signs were noted for a few rabbits in the control and test groups; including: soft stool, mucoid diarrhea, brown stained anogenital region and emaciation. Female rabbit #7792, control group, exhibited signs of mucoid diarrhea, possible anorexia and emaciation prior to death. Male rabbit #7731, 2000 mg/kg, abraded skin, exhibited possible anorexia and no stool in pan prior to death. Possible anorexia was observed in an occasional animal in the control group and in the 500 and 2000 mg/kg test groups.
Two rabbits died during the course of the study period. Female rabbit #1792 (2 mI/kg, intact skin) was found dead on Day 14 and male rabbit #1131 (2000 mg/kg, abraded skin) was found dead on Day 7.
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN:
No statistically significant differences were seen in group mean body weights.
DERMAL IRRITATION:
In the control group no dermal irritation was observed. At 125, 500 and 2000 mg/kg, the majority of rabbits exhibited very slight to moderate erythema, edema, atonia, desquamation and coriaceousness. Very slight to marked fissuring was also observed for some rabbits in the three test article groups. Several animals in all test groups exhibited marked desquamation during the latter part of the study. Blanching was observed infrequently in the 125 and 2000 mg/kg test article groups. An occasional animal in the 125 and 500 mg/kg test article groups also exhibited subcutaneous hemorrhaging. No eachar or exfoliation was observed in any group.
HAEMATOLOGY:
Changes in Segmented neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Erythrocytes at 2000 mg/kg were not considered to be related to Terphenyl, hydrogenated treatment.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY:
Changes in Globulin, Total Protein and Glucose at 500 and 2000 mg/kg were not considered to he related to Terphenyl, hydrogenated treatment.
ORGAN WEIGHTS:
No toxicologically significant test article-related weight variations (absolute or relative) were observed among animals sacrificed at study termination.
GROSS PATHOLOGY:
1. Macroscopic
Toxicologically significant compound-related gross macroscopic lesions were observed in male and female rabbits receiving 125, 500 and 2000 mg/kg. The lesions commonly observed were thickening and crust formation.
2. Microscopic
Test article-related morphologic changes on the skin application sites were observed among all male and female rabbits at all dose levels; consisting of epithlial acanthosis, epidermal hyperkeratosis and inflammatory cell infiltrates among animals sacrificed at study termination. Microabscesses were present at the 2000 mg/kg dosage level. One male animal at 2000 mg/kg dosage level that died on the study, also showed similar type of changes on the skin application site mentioned above. The distribution and relative severity of the above skin changes were generally more pronounced among male and female rabbits at the 2000 mg/kg dosage level. The changes described in tissues other than the skin application sites were regarded as spontaneous in nature, not unusual for rabbits of this age and strain and unrelated to compound application.
Effect levels
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- (Systemic toxicity)
- Effect level:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical signs
- dermal irritation
- haematology
- mortality
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- There was no systemic toxicity up to 2.000 mg/kg bw/day. The NOAEL for systemic toxicity is therefore 2.000 mg/kg bw/day. Skin findings were observed at all dose groups, however more pronounced at the 2.000 mg/kg bw/day.
- Executive summary:
Terphenyl, hydrogenated was administered by dermal application to three groups of 10 male and 10 female New Zealand White rabbits, one-half with intact skin and one-half with abraded skin, five days per week for three consecutive weeks at dosage levels of 0, 125, 500 and 2000 mg/kg. One rabbit at the high dosage level (2000 mg/kg) was found dead on study Day 7 and one control rabbit was found dead on study Day 14. A number of incidental and spontaneous pharmacotoxic signs were noted in the control and test groups. Possible anorexia was observed in an occasional animal in the control, 500 and 2000 mg/kg groups. No statistically significant differences were seen in group mean body weights. Very slight to moderate erythema, edema, atonia, desquamation, coriaceousness and very slight marked fissuring were observed for some rabbits in all test groups. Several animals in all test groups exhibited marked desquamation during the latter part of the study. Blanching (125 and 2000 mg/kg) and subcutaneous hemorrhaging (125 and 500 mg/kg) were observed. No relevant changes were observed for haematology and clinical chemistry. No toxicologically significant test article-related weight variations (absolute or relative) were observed among animals sacrificed at study termination. At macroscopic examination, commonly observed findings were thickening and crust formation of the skin were observed at all dose levels in both sexes. Test article-related histological changes on the skin application sites were observed among all male and female rabbits at all dose levels; consisting of epithelial acanthosis, epidermal hyperkeratosis and inflammatory cell infiltrates among animals sacrificed at study termination. Microabscesses were present at the 2000 mg/kg dosage level. One male animal at 2000 mg/kg dosage level that died on the study, also showed similar type of changes on the skin application site mentioned above. The distribution and relative severity of the above skin changes were generally more pronounced among male and female rabbits at the 2000 mg/kg dosage level. The changes described in tissues other than the skin application sites were regarded as spontaneous in nature, not unusual for rabbits of this age and strain and unrelated to compound application. In conclusion, daily administration of Terphenyl, hydrogenated to the skin of rabbits for 21-days produced gross and microscopic changes at the dosaqe levels of 125, 500 and 2000 mg/kg/day. There were however no major signs of systemic toxicity; the findings are considered to be related to the dermal application of Terphenyl, hydrogenated; the distribution and severity were generally more pronounced among male and female rabbits at the 2.000 mg/kg dose level.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.