Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 943-080-0 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 7.33 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: NOEC
- Value:
- 183.37 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- Allometric scaling is applied as described in ECHA technical guidance the oral NOEL in the rat mg/kg/day *1/0.38 * 6.7/10 = mg/m3 inhalation NOEC for workers.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The default assessment factor for NOEL is 1.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- ECHA guidance indicates a factor of 2 for extrapolation from subchronic to chronic study.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling is usually not applied in the derivation of the inhalation DNEL.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- No substance specific data is available.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA guidance indicates a default assessment factor of 5 for workers.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Available data from substance fulfilling scientific principle is used.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No further uncertainties to be taken into account.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 7.33 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- Allometric scaling is applied as described in ECHA technical guidance the oral NOEL in the rat mg/kg/day *1/0.38 * 6.7/10 = mg/m3 inhalation NOEC for workers.
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.04 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: NOEL
- Value:
- 104 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No default factor (i.e. factor 1) should be introduced when performing oral-to-dermal extrapolation.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The default assessment factor for NOEL is 1.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- ECHA guidance indicates a factor of 2 for extrapolation from subchronic to chronic study.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- The default allometric scalling factor for rat to human is 4.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- No substance specific data is available.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA guidance indicates a default assessment factor of 5 for workers.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Available data from substance fulfilling scientific principle is used.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No further uncertainties to be taken into account.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.04 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No default factor (i.e. factor 1) should be introduced when performing oral-to-dermal extrapolation.
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
As basis for DNEL derivation the result from a 90-days study was used. The study was carried out on an analogue substance polyoxyethylene (1-6) alkylamine (C12-C22) fatty acid (C12-C22) ester as read-across information. The max. Safety level (NOEL) of the substance was 0.1% in diet and the corresponding dose value for male rats was 104.0 mg/kg/day obtained from their average food consumption. Allometric scaling is applied as described in ECHA technical guidance the oral NOEL in the rat mg/kg/day *1/0.38 * 6.7/10 = mg/m3 inhalation NOEC for workers. The NOELcorr for dermal therefore remains unchanged. The local effects and hazard for eyes are with low hazard (no threshold derived) due to the lack of relevant response observed in available studies. |
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.81 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: NOEL
- Value:
- 90.43 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- Allometric scaling is applied as described in ECHA technical guidance the oral NOAEL in the rat mg/kg/day *1/1.15 = mg/m3 inhalation NOAEC for general population.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The default assessment factor for NOEL is 1.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- ECHA guidance indicates a factor of 2 for extrapolation from subchronic to chronic study.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Allometric scaling is usually not applied in the derivation of the inhalation DNEL.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- No substance specific data is available.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA guidance indicates a default assessment factor of 10 for general population.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Available data from substance fulfilling scientific principle is used.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No further uncertainties to be taken into account.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.81 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- Allometric scaling is applied as described in ECHA technical guidance the oral NOAEL in the rat mg/kg/day *1/1.15 = mg/m3 inhalation NOAEC for general population.
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.52 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: NOEL
- Value:
- 104 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No default factor (i.e. factor 1) should be introduced when performing oral-to-dermal extrapolation.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The default assessment factor for NOEL is 1.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- ECHA guidance indicates a factor of 2 for extrapolation from subchronic to chronic study.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- The default allometric scalling factor for rat to human is 4.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- No substance specific data is available.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA guidance indicates a default assessment factor of 10 for general population.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Available data from substance fulfilling scientific principle is used.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No further uncertainties to be taken into account.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.52 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No default factor (i.e. factor 1) should be introduced when performing oral-to-dermal extrapolation.
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.52 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: NOEL
- Value:
- 104 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- No route to route extrapolation is applied.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- The default assessment factor for NOEL is 1.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- ECHA guidance indicates a factor of 2 for extrapolation from subchronic to chronic study.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- The default allometric scalling factor for rat to human is 4.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- No substance specific data is available.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- ECHA guidance indicates a default assessment factor of 10 for general population.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Available data from substance fulfilling scientific principle is used.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No further uncertainties to be taken into account.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.52 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
As basis for DNEL derivation the result from a 90-days study was used. The study was carried out on an analogue substance polyoxyethylene (1-6) alkylamine (C12-C22) fatty acid (C12-C22) ester as read-across information. The max. Safety level (NOEL) of the substance was 0.1% in diet and the corresponding dose value for male rats was 104.0 mg/kg/day obtained from their average food consumption.
Allometric scaling is applied as described in ECHA technical guidance the oral NOEL in the rat mg/kg/day *1/1.15 = mg/m3 inhalation NOEC for general population.
The NOELcorr for dermal therefore remains unchanged.
The local effects and hazard for eyes are with low hazard (no threshold derived) due to the lack of relevant response observed in available studies.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.